A Quantitative Evaluation of the Performance of the Low-Cost AudioMoth Acoustic Recording Unit

The AudioMoth is a popular autonomous recording unit (ARU) that is widely used to record vocalizing species in the field. Despite its growing use, there have been few quantitative tests on the performance of this recorder. Such information is needed to design effective field surveys and to appropria...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sam Lapp, Nickolus Stahlman, Justin Kitzes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/11/5254
_version_ 1827739173211078656
author Sam Lapp
Nickolus Stahlman
Justin Kitzes
author_facet Sam Lapp
Nickolus Stahlman
Justin Kitzes
author_sort Sam Lapp
collection DOAJ
description The AudioMoth is a popular autonomous recording unit (ARU) that is widely used to record vocalizing species in the field. Despite its growing use, there have been few quantitative tests on the performance of this recorder. Such information is needed to design effective field surveys and to appropriately analyze recordings made by this device. Here, we report the results of two tests designed to evaluate the performance characteristics of the AudioMoth recorder. First, we performed indoor and outdoor pink noise playback experiments to evaluate how different device settings, orientations, mounting conditions, and housing options affect frequency response patterns. We found little variation in acoustic performance between devices and relatively little effect of placing recorders in a plastic bag for weather protection. The AudioMoth has a mostly flat on-axis response with a boost above 3 kHz, with a generally omnidirectional response that suffers from attenuation behind the recorder, an effect that is accentuated when it is mounted on a tree. Second, we performed battery life tests under a variety of recording frequencies, gain settings, environmental temperatures, and battery types. We found that standard alkaline batteries last for an average of 189 h at room temperature using a 32 kHz sample rate, and that lithium batteries can last for twice as long at freezing temperatures compared to alkaline batteries. This information will aid researchers in both collecting and analyzing recordings generated by the AudioMoth recorder.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:57:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d5d2ecec5ffc40a7856089fd12950d7f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:57:07Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-d5d2ecec5ffc40a7856089fd12950d7f2023-11-18T08:34:40ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-06-012311525410.3390/s23115254A Quantitative Evaluation of the Performance of the Low-Cost AudioMoth Acoustic Recording UnitSam Lapp0Nickolus Stahlman1Justin Kitzes2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 103 Clapp Hall, Fifth and Ruskin Avenues, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USADepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 103 Clapp Hall, Fifth and Ruskin Avenues, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USADepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 103 Clapp Hall, Fifth and Ruskin Avenues, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USAThe AudioMoth is a popular autonomous recording unit (ARU) that is widely used to record vocalizing species in the field. Despite its growing use, there have been few quantitative tests on the performance of this recorder. Such information is needed to design effective field surveys and to appropriately analyze recordings made by this device. Here, we report the results of two tests designed to evaluate the performance characteristics of the AudioMoth recorder. First, we performed indoor and outdoor pink noise playback experiments to evaluate how different device settings, orientations, mounting conditions, and housing options affect frequency response patterns. We found little variation in acoustic performance between devices and relatively little effect of placing recorders in a plastic bag for weather protection. The AudioMoth has a mostly flat on-axis response with a boost above 3 kHz, with a generally omnidirectional response that suffers from attenuation behind the recorder, an effect that is accentuated when it is mounted on a tree. Second, we performed battery life tests under a variety of recording frequencies, gain settings, environmental temperatures, and battery types. We found that standard alkaline batteries last for an average of 189 h at room temperature using a 32 kHz sample rate, and that lithium batteries can last for twice as long at freezing temperatures compared to alkaline batteries. This information will aid researchers in both collecting and analyzing recordings generated by the AudioMoth recorder.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/11/5254ARUautomated recording unitAudioMothacoustic monitoring
spellingShingle Sam Lapp
Nickolus Stahlman
Justin Kitzes
A Quantitative Evaluation of the Performance of the Low-Cost AudioMoth Acoustic Recording Unit
Sensors
ARU
automated recording unit
AudioMoth
acoustic monitoring
title A Quantitative Evaluation of the Performance of the Low-Cost AudioMoth Acoustic Recording Unit
title_full A Quantitative Evaluation of the Performance of the Low-Cost AudioMoth Acoustic Recording Unit
title_fullStr A Quantitative Evaluation of the Performance of the Low-Cost AudioMoth Acoustic Recording Unit
title_full_unstemmed A Quantitative Evaluation of the Performance of the Low-Cost AudioMoth Acoustic Recording Unit
title_short A Quantitative Evaluation of the Performance of the Low-Cost AudioMoth Acoustic Recording Unit
title_sort quantitative evaluation of the performance of the low cost audiomoth acoustic recording unit
topic ARU
automated recording unit
AudioMoth
acoustic monitoring
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/11/5254
work_keys_str_mv AT samlapp aquantitativeevaluationoftheperformanceofthelowcostaudiomothacousticrecordingunit
AT nickolusstahlman aquantitativeevaluationoftheperformanceofthelowcostaudiomothacousticrecordingunit
AT justinkitzes aquantitativeevaluationoftheperformanceofthelowcostaudiomothacousticrecordingunit
AT samlapp quantitativeevaluationoftheperformanceofthelowcostaudiomothacousticrecordingunit
AT nickolusstahlman quantitativeevaluationoftheperformanceofthelowcostaudiomothacousticrecordingunit
AT justinkitzes quantitativeevaluationoftheperformanceofthelowcostaudiomothacousticrecordingunit