Optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis of early gastric cancer

Background and study aims No recommendations are available for optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for early gastric cancer (GC), and whether detection of early GC is improved by increasing the number of biopsy is unclear. We therefore evaluated the relationship between number of biopsies and diag...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masaki Nishitani, Naohiro Yoshida, Shigetsugu Tsuji, Teppei Masunaga, Hirokazu Hirai, Saori Miyajima, Akihiro Dejima, Takashi Nakashima, Shigenori Wakita, Kenichi Takemura, Hiroshi Minato, Shuichi Kaneko, Hisashi Doyama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-12-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1007-1730
_version_ 1818958966215933952
author Masaki Nishitani
Naohiro Yoshida
Shigetsugu Tsuji
Teppei Masunaga
Hirokazu Hirai
Saori Miyajima
Akihiro Dejima
Takashi Nakashima
Shigenori Wakita
Kenichi Takemura
Hiroshi Minato
Shuichi Kaneko
Hisashi Doyama
author_facet Masaki Nishitani
Naohiro Yoshida
Shigetsugu Tsuji
Teppei Masunaga
Hirokazu Hirai
Saori Miyajima
Akihiro Dejima
Takashi Nakashima
Shigenori Wakita
Kenichi Takemura
Hiroshi Minato
Shuichi Kaneko
Hisashi Doyama
author_sort Masaki Nishitani
collection DOAJ
description Background and study aims No recommendations are available for optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for early gastric cancer (GC), and whether detection of early GC is improved by increasing the number of biopsy is unclear. We therefore evaluated the relationship between number of biopsies and diagnostic accuracy. Materials and methods We retrospectively evaluated 858 early GCs (623 from endoscopic submucosal dissection and 235 surgical specimens), which we classified as obtained after one, two, or three or more biopsies. We assessed diagnostic accuracy by number of biopsies, and in subgroups by tumor diameter, gross type, and surface color. Results Almost half the lesions were obtained after one biopsy each, 30 % after two biopsies, and 20 % after three or more biopsies. Although diagnostic accuracy increased with biopsy number, it was significantly greater for the two-biopsy group than the one-biopsy group, (92.5 % vs. 83.9 %, P = 0.0009), but did not significantly differ between the two- and three or more-biopsy groups. This finding was seen when tumors were evaluated by size, but not by elevated type and surface color, for which more biopsies did not improve diagnostic accuracy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that two or more biopsies was the independent significant factors for diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions Two biopsies are the optimal number required to diagnose early GC.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T11:34:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d5d383674200401cbcd745100f5dad30
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T11:34:08Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format Article
series Endoscopy International Open
spelling doaj.art-d5d383674200401cbcd745100f5dad302022-12-21T19:42:10ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362019-12-010712E1683E169010.1055/a-1007-1730Optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis of early gastric cancerMasaki Nishitani0Naohiro Yoshida1Shigetsugu Tsuji2Teppei Masunaga3Hirokazu Hirai4Saori Miyajima5Akihiro Dejima6Takashi Nakashima7Shigenori Wakita8Kenichi Takemura9Hiroshi Minato10Shuichi Kaneko11Hisashi Doyama12Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanBackground and study aims No recommendations are available for optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for early gastric cancer (GC), and whether detection of early GC is improved by increasing the number of biopsy is unclear. We therefore evaluated the relationship between number of biopsies and diagnostic accuracy. Materials and methods We retrospectively evaluated 858 early GCs (623 from endoscopic submucosal dissection and 235 surgical specimens), which we classified as obtained after one, two, or three or more biopsies. We assessed diagnostic accuracy by number of biopsies, and in subgroups by tumor diameter, gross type, and surface color. Results Almost half the lesions were obtained after one biopsy each, 30 % after two biopsies, and 20 % after three or more biopsies. Although diagnostic accuracy increased with biopsy number, it was significantly greater for the two-biopsy group than the one-biopsy group, (92.5 % vs. 83.9 %, P = 0.0009), but did not significantly differ between the two- and three or more-biopsy groups. This finding was seen when tumors were evaluated by size, but not by elevated type and surface color, for which more biopsies did not improve diagnostic accuracy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that two or more biopsies was the independent significant factors for diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions Two biopsies are the optimal number required to diagnose early GC.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1007-1730
spellingShingle Masaki Nishitani
Naohiro Yoshida
Shigetsugu Tsuji
Teppei Masunaga
Hirokazu Hirai
Saori Miyajima
Akihiro Dejima
Takashi Nakashima
Shigenori Wakita
Kenichi Takemura
Hiroshi Minato
Shuichi Kaneko
Hisashi Doyama
Optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis of early gastric cancer
Endoscopy International Open
title Optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis of early gastric cancer
title_full Optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis of early gastric cancer
title_fullStr Optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis of early gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis of early gastric cancer
title_short Optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis of early gastric cancer
title_sort optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis of early gastric cancer
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1007-1730
work_keys_str_mv AT masakinishitani optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT naohiroyoshida optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT shigetsugutsuji optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT teppeimasunaga optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT hirokazuhirai optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT saorimiyajima optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT akihirodejima optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT takashinakashima optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT shigenoriwakita optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT kenichitakemura optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT hiroshiminato optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT shuichikaneko optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer
AT hisashidoyama optimalnumberofendoscopicbiopsiesfordiagnosisofearlygastriccancer