Crime Proceeds Value Threshold in Extended Confiscation in the Light of the Principles of Legality and Proportionality and Rational Penal Policy
The article discusses the clause provided in the Lithuanian Criminal Code, which limits the court’s extended powers of confiscation in regard of crime proceeds of value less than EUR 12,500. The developing practice of the application of extended powers of confiscation in Lithuania makes this issue...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Vilnius University Press
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | Kriminologijos studijos |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kriminologijos-studijos/article/view/29668 |
| _version_ | 1797937569242021888 |
|---|---|
| author | Skirmantas Bikelis |
| author_facet | Skirmantas Bikelis |
| author_sort | Skirmantas Bikelis |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The article discusses the clause provided in the Lithuanian Criminal Code, which limits the court’s extended powers of confiscation in regard of crime proceeds of value less than EUR 12,500. The developing practice of the application of extended powers of confiscation in Lithuania makes this issue not only a matter of principle but also a practical one. The article analyzes to what extent such a precondition is compatible with the principle of legality and in particular the principle that rights do not arise from wrongdoing (Ex iniuria ius non oritur). Further, the author discusses the arguments justifying the discussed limitation to confiscate low-value crime proceeds – rational organisation of law enforcement resources, the principle of proportionality and a requirement of legal systematicity. The article concludes that the latter arguments are not always used accurately. The limitations of law enforcement resources ought to be regarded by providing authorities with discretion, not by limiting confiscation powers. The principle of proportionality and legal systematicity are hardly applicable in the discussion due to the specific legal nature of the confiscation powers. In parallel, the article concludes that the limitation of the minimum value of confiscatable crime proceeds is contrary to the European Union law – Directive 2014/42/EU.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T18:47:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d5d5337f651e4ae58fe05457cbadde9a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2538-8754 2351-6097 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T18:47:31Z |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | Vilnius University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Kriminologijos studijos |
| spelling | doaj.art-d5d5337f651e4ae58fe05457cbadde9a2023-02-01T10:06:33ZengVilnius University PressKriminologijos studijos2538-87542351-60972022-12-011010.15388/CrimLithuan.2022.10.2Crime Proceeds Value Threshold in Extended Confiscation in the Light of the Principles of Legality and Proportionality and Rational Penal PolicySkirmantas Bikelis0Law Institute of the Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences The article discusses the clause provided in the Lithuanian Criminal Code, which limits the court’s extended powers of confiscation in regard of crime proceeds of value less than EUR 12,500. The developing practice of the application of extended powers of confiscation in Lithuania makes this issue not only a matter of principle but also a practical one. The article analyzes to what extent such a precondition is compatible with the principle of legality and in particular the principle that rights do not arise from wrongdoing (Ex iniuria ius non oritur). Further, the author discusses the arguments justifying the discussed limitation to confiscate low-value crime proceeds – rational organisation of law enforcement resources, the principle of proportionality and a requirement of legal systematicity. The article concludes that the latter arguments are not always used accurately. The limitations of law enforcement resources ought to be regarded by providing authorities with discretion, not by limiting confiscation powers. The principle of proportionality and legal systematicity are hardly applicable in the discussion due to the specific legal nature of the confiscation powers. In parallel, the article concludes that the limitation of the minimum value of confiscatable crime proceeds is contrary to the European Union law – Directive 2014/42/EU. https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kriminologijos-studijos/article/view/29668extended powers of confiscationprinciple of legalityrational penal policyDirective 2014/42/EUproperty value threshold |
| spellingShingle | Skirmantas Bikelis Crime Proceeds Value Threshold in Extended Confiscation in the Light of the Principles of Legality and Proportionality and Rational Penal Policy Kriminologijos studijos extended powers of confiscation principle of legality rational penal policy Directive 2014/42/EU property value threshold |
| title | Crime Proceeds Value Threshold in Extended Confiscation in the Light of the Principles of Legality and Proportionality and Rational Penal Policy |
| title_full | Crime Proceeds Value Threshold in Extended Confiscation in the Light of the Principles of Legality and Proportionality and Rational Penal Policy |
| title_fullStr | Crime Proceeds Value Threshold in Extended Confiscation in the Light of the Principles of Legality and Proportionality and Rational Penal Policy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Crime Proceeds Value Threshold in Extended Confiscation in the Light of the Principles of Legality and Proportionality and Rational Penal Policy |
| title_short | Crime Proceeds Value Threshold in Extended Confiscation in the Light of the Principles of Legality and Proportionality and Rational Penal Policy |
| title_sort | crime proceeds value threshold in extended confiscation in the light of the principles of legality and proportionality and rational penal policy |
| topic | extended powers of confiscation principle of legality rational penal policy Directive 2014/42/EU property value threshold |
| url | https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kriminologijos-studijos/article/view/29668 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT skirmantasbikelis crimeproceedsvaluethresholdinextendedconfiscationinthelightoftheprinciplesoflegalityandproportionalityandrationalpenalpolicy |