Operative Vaginal Delivery Is a Safe Option in Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor after Cesarean

Abstract Objective To compare outcomes of operative intervention in the second stage of labor during trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). Study Design A secondary analysis of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network cesarean section registry was conducted. Analysis was b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erin Krizman, Patricia Grzebielski, Kathleen M. Antony, Emmanuel Sampene, Matthew Shanahan, J. Igor Iruretagoyena, Justin Bohrer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2019-04-01
Series:American Journal of Perinatology Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0039-1692482
_version_ 1818962249344090112
author Erin Krizman
Patricia Grzebielski
Kathleen M. Antony
Emmanuel Sampene
Matthew Shanahan
J. Igor Iruretagoyena
Justin Bohrer
author_facet Erin Krizman
Patricia Grzebielski
Kathleen M. Antony
Emmanuel Sampene
Matthew Shanahan
J. Igor Iruretagoyena
Justin Bohrer
author_sort Erin Krizman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To compare outcomes of operative intervention in the second stage of labor during trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). Study Design A secondary analysis of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network cesarean section registry was conducted. Analysis was by first attempted mode of delivery. Results A total of 1,837 met inclusion criteria. Subjects in the operative vaginal groups (OVDs) were more likely to have a prior vaginal delivery (vacuum 34.2%; forceps 34.3%) than the repeat cesarean delivery (RCD) group (22.6%; p < 0.0001). Most OVD attempts were successful (forceps 90.4%; vacuum 92.6%). Neonatal morbidity was not different (12.1% forceps vs. 14.6% vacuum; 14.8% RCD). Maternal morbidity was highest among forceps deliveries (32.3 vs. 24.3% vacuum; 22.0% RCD, p = 0.0001). RCD was associated with surgical injury (2.7 vs. 0.7% forceps; 0% vacuum; p < 0.0001), endometritis (8.4 vs. 3.2% forceps, 1.2% vacuum; p < 0.0001), and wound complications (1.9 vs. 0.4% forceps; 0.3% vacuum; p = 0.006). OVD was associated with anal sphincter laceration (22.7% forceps, 15.5% vacuum; 0% RCD; p = 0.01). Conclusion The success rate of OVD is high in TOLAC with similar outcomes to RCD. Maternal composite outcomes were highest with forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. However, considering overall morbidity, OVD in the second stage of labor in TOLAC is a reasonable, safe option in selected cases.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T12:26:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d5d750ca02e749d094f0717934b91e83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2157-6998
2157-7005
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T12:26:19Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format Article
series American Journal of Perinatology Reports
spelling doaj.art-d5d750ca02e749d094f0717934b91e832022-12-21T19:40:52ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.American Journal of Perinatology Reports2157-69982157-70052019-04-010902e190e19410.1055/s-0039-1692482Operative Vaginal Delivery Is a Safe Option in Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor after CesareanErin Krizman0Patricia Grzebielski1Kathleen M. Antony2Emmanuel Sampene3Matthew Shanahan4J. Igor Iruretagoyena5Justin Bohrer6Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WisconsinDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WisconsinDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WisconsinDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WisconsinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MissouriDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WisconsinDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WisconsinAbstract Objective To compare outcomes of operative intervention in the second stage of labor during trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). Study Design A secondary analysis of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network cesarean section registry was conducted. Analysis was by first attempted mode of delivery. Results A total of 1,837 met inclusion criteria. Subjects in the operative vaginal groups (OVDs) were more likely to have a prior vaginal delivery (vacuum 34.2%; forceps 34.3%) than the repeat cesarean delivery (RCD) group (22.6%; p < 0.0001). Most OVD attempts were successful (forceps 90.4%; vacuum 92.6%). Neonatal morbidity was not different (12.1% forceps vs. 14.6% vacuum; 14.8% RCD). Maternal morbidity was highest among forceps deliveries (32.3 vs. 24.3% vacuum; 22.0% RCD, p = 0.0001). RCD was associated with surgical injury (2.7 vs. 0.7% forceps; 0% vacuum; p < 0.0001), endometritis (8.4 vs. 3.2% forceps, 1.2% vacuum; p < 0.0001), and wound complications (1.9 vs. 0.4% forceps; 0.3% vacuum; p = 0.006). OVD was associated with anal sphincter laceration (22.7% forceps, 15.5% vacuum; 0% RCD; p = 0.01). Conclusion The success rate of OVD is high in TOLAC with similar outcomes to RCD. Maternal composite outcomes were highest with forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. However, considering overall morbidity, OVD in the second stage of labor in TOLAC is a reasonable, safe option in selected cases.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0039-1692482trial of labor after cesareanoperative vaginal deliveryforceps deliveryvacuum-assisted deliveryvaginal birthcesarean delivery
spellingShingle Erin Krizman
Patricia Grzebielski
Kathleen M. Antony
Emmanuel Sampene
Matthew Shanahan
J. Igor Iruretagoyena
Justin Bohrer
Operative Vaginal Delivery Is a Safe Option in Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor after Cesarean
American Journal of Perinatology Reports
trial of labor after cesarean
operative vaginal delivery
forceps delivery
vacuum-assisted delivery
vaginal birth
cesarean delivery
title Operative Vaginal Delivery Is a Safe Option in Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor after Cesarean
title_full Operative Vaginal Delivery Is a Safe Option in Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor after Cesarean
title_fullStr Operative Vaginal Delivery Is a Safe Option in Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor after Cesarean
title_full_unstemmed Operative Vaginal Delivery Is a Safe Option in Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor after Cesarean
title_short Operative Vaginal Delivery Is a Safe Option in Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor after Cesarean
title_sort operative vaginal delivery is a safe option in women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean
topic trial of labor after cesarean
operative vaginal delivery
forceps delivery
vacuum-assisted delivery
vaginal birth
cesarean delivery
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0039-1692482
work_keys_str_mv AT erinkrizman operativevaginaldeliveryisasafeoptioninwomenundergoingatrialoflaboraftercesarean
AT patriciagrzebielski operativevaginaldeliveryisasafeoptioninwomenundergoingatrialoflaboraftercesarean
AT kathleenmantony operativevaginaldeliveryisasafeoptioninwomenundergoingatrialoflaboraftercesarean
AT emmanuelsampene operativevaginaldeliveryisasafeoptioninwomenundergoingatrialoflaboraftercesarean
AT matthewshanahan operativevaginaldeliveryisasafeoptioninwomenundergoingatrialoflaboraftercesarean
AT jigoriruretagoyena operativevaginaldeliveryisasafeoptioninwomenundergoingatrialoflaboraftercesarean
AT justinbohrer operativevaginaldeliveryisasafeoptioninwomenundergoingatrialoflaboraftercesarean