Language Variations in Describing Nutrition and Hydration Interventions in State Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Forms and the Implications for Advanced Dementia Patients

Background: Research suggests that language can impact medical decision-making, but few studies exist describing the variations in language to describe end-of-life nutrition and hydration interventions. The language contained in the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form varies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sarah Rebecca Stephen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mary Ann Liebert 2024-01-01
Series:Palliative Medicine Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/PMR.2023.0029
_version_ 1797346122804494336
author Sarah Rebecca Stephen
author_facet Sarah Rebecca Stephen
author_sort Sarah Rebecca Stephen
collection DOAJ
description Background: Research suggests that language can impact medical decision-making, but few studies exist describing the variations in language to describe end-of-life nutrition and hydration interventions. The language contained in the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form varies across states, but this variation has not yet been fully analyzed. This investigation has implications for communicating with surrogates about the insertion of feeding tubes in advanced dementia patients, a common procedure in this population despite its potentially high risks and low benefits. Objective: Identify and analyze the variations in language related to end-of-life nutrition and hydration interventions in state POLST forms. Design: Descriptive study. Measurements: The most up-to-date POLST forms for each of the 50 US states and the District of Columbia as of August 2022 were analyzed for their descriptions of end-of-life nutrition and hydration interventions. Results: Fifty out of 51 (98%) forms referenced nutrition and/or hydration interventions. Four main modifiers of the word ?nutrition? and/or ?hydration? were identified: artificial (32%), artificially administered (56%), medically administered (14%), and assisted/medically assisted (18%). Forty-eight (96%) forms indicated an explicit option to forgo feeding tubes, and all of these forms described doing so with negatively valenced language. Conclusions: The language describing end-of-life nutrition and hydration interventions and feeding tubes in state POLST forms is insufficiently specific and varies significantly across the country. These terms are at best ambiguous and at worst imply incorrect information. More precise language may assist in the difficult discussion between physicians and surrogates about inserting feeding tubes in advanced dementia patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:27:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d5e87daec4d644ddb56ebafee7104905
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2689-2820
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:27:18Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Mary Ann Liebert
record_format Article
series Palliative Medicine Reports
spelling doaj.art-d5e87daec4d644ddb56ebafee71049052024-01-26T05:11:23ZengMary Ann LiebertPalliative Medicine Reports2689-28202024-01-0151202410.1089/PMR.2023.0029Language Variations in Describing Nutrition and Hydration Interventions in State Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Forms and the Implications for Advanced Dementia PatientsSarah Rebecca StephenBackground: Research suggests that language can impact medical decision-making, but few studies exist describing the variations in language to describe end-of-life nutrition and hydration interventions. The language contained in the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form varies across states, but this variation has not yet been fully analyzed. This investigation has implications for communicating with surrogates about the insertion of feeding tubes in advanced dementia patients, a common procedure in this population despite its potentially high risks and low benefits. Objective: Identify and analyze the variations in language related to end-of-life nutrition and hydration interventions in state POLST forms. Design: Descriptive study. Measurements: The most up-to-date POLST forms for each of the 50 US states and the District of Columbia as of August 2022 were analyzed for their descriptions of end-of-life nutrition and hydration interventions. Results: Fifty out of 51 (98%) forms referenced nutrition and/or hydration interventions. Four main modifiers of the word ?nutrition? and/or ?hydration? were identified: artificial (32%), artificially administered (56%), medically administered (14%), and assisted/medically assisted (18%). Forty-eight (96%) forms indicated an explicit option to forgo feeding tubes, and all of these forms described doing so with negatively valenced language. Conclusions: The language describing end-of-life nutrition and hydration interventions and feeding tubes in state POLST forms is insufficiently specific and varies significantly across the country. These terms are at best ambiguous and at worst imply incorrect information. More precise language may assist in the difficult discussion between physicians and surrogates about inserting feeding tubes in advanced dementia patients.https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/PMR.2023.0029advance directivesbioethicsdementiageriatric palliative care end of life issueslong-term care nursing home patients at the end of life
spellingShingle Sarah Rebecca Stephen
Language Variations in Describing Nutrition and Hydration Interventions in State Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Forms and the Implications for Advanced Dementia Patients
Palliative Medicine Reports
advance directives
bioethics
dementia
geriatric palliative care end of life issues
long-term care nursing home patients at the end of life
title Language Variations in Describing Nutrition and Hydration Interventions in State Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Forms and the Implications for Advanced Dementia Patients
title_full Language Variations in Describing Nutrition and Hydration Interventions in State Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Forms and the Implications for Advanced Dementia Patients
title_fullStr Language Variations in Describing Nutrition and Hydration Interventions in State Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Forms and the Implications for Advanced Dementia Patients
title_full_unstemmed Language Variations in Describing Nutrition and Hydration Interventions in State Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Forms and the Implications for Advanced Dementia Patients
title_short Language Variations in Describing Nutrition and Hydration Interventions in State Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Forms and the Implications for Advanced Dementia Patients
title_sort language variations in describing nutrition and hydration interventions in state physician orders for life sustaining treatment forms and the implications for advanced dementia patients
topic advance directives
bioethics
dementia
geriatric palliative care end of life issues
long-term care nursing home patients at the end of life
url https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/PMR.2023.0029
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahrebeccastephen languagevariationsindescribingnutritionandhydrationinterventionsinstatephysicianordersforlifesustainingtreatmentformsandtheimplicationsforadvanceddementiapatients