Influence of Different Satellite Imagery on the Analysis of Riparian Leaf Density in a Mountain Stream

In recent decades, technological advancements in sensors have generated increasing interest in remote sensing data for the study of vegetation features. Image pixel resolution can affect data analysis and results. This study evaluated the potential of three satellite images of differing resolution (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giovanni Romano, Giovanni Francesco Ricci, Francesco Gentile
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/20/3376
_version_ 1827704239710797824
author Giovanni Romano
Giovanni Francesco Ricci
Francesco Gentile
author_facet Giovanni Romano
Giovanni Francesco Ricci
Francesco Gentile
author_sort Giovanni Romano
collection DOAJ
description In recent decades, technological advancements in sensors have generated increasing interest in remote sensing data for the study of vegetation features. Image pixel resolution can affect data analysis and results. This study evaluated the potential of three satellite images of differing resolution (Landsat 8, 30 m; Sentinel-2, 10 m; and Pleiades 1A, 2 m) in assessing the Leaf Area Index (LAI) of riparian vegetation in two Mediterranean streams, and in both a winter wheat field and a deciduous forest used to compare the accuracy of the results. In this study, three different retrieval methods—the Caraux-Garson, the Lambert-Beer, and the Campbell and Norman equations—are used to estimate LAI from the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). To validate sensor data, LAI values were measured in the field using the LAI 2200 Plant Canopy Analyzer. The statistical indices showed a better performance for Pleiades 1A and Landsat 8 images, the former particularly in sites characterized by high canopy closure, such as deciduous forests, or in areas with stable riparian vegetation, the latter where stable reaches of riparian vegetation cover are almost absent or very homogenous, as in winter wheat fields. Sentinel-2 images provided more accurate results in terms of the range of LAI values. Considering the different types of satellite imagery, the Lambert-Beer equation generally performed best in estimating LAI from the NDVI, especially in areas that are geomorphologically stable or have a denser vegetation cover, such as deciduous forests.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:35:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d5f8db2c80ab4d37a869c0431cead6a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:35:54Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-d5f8db2c80ab4d37a869c0431cead6a52023-11-20T17:16:43ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922020-10-011220337610.3390/rs12203376Influence of Different Satellite Imagery on the Analysis of Riparian Leaf Density in a Mountain StreamGiovanni Romano0Giovanni Francesco Ricci1Francesco Gentile2Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70032 Bari, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70032 Bari, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70032 Bari, ItalyIn recent decades, technological advancements in sensors have generated increasing interest in remote sensing data for the study of vegetation features. Image pixel resolution can affect data analysis and results. This study evaluated the potential of three satellite images of differing resolution (Landsat 8, 30 m; Sentinel-2, 10 m; and Pleiades 1A, 2 m) in assessing the Leaf Area Index (LAI) of riparian vegetation in two Mediterranean streams, and in both a winter wheat field and a deciduous forest used to compare the accuracy of the results. In this study, three different retrieval methods—the Caraux-Garson, the Lambert-Beer, and the Campbell and Norman equations—are used to estimate LAI from the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). To validate sensor data, LAI values were measured in the field using the LAI 2200 Plant Canopy Analyzer. The statistical indices showed a better performance for Pleiades 1A and Landsat 8 images, the former particularly in sites characterized by high canopy closure, such as deciduous forests, or in areas with stable riparian vegetation, the latter where stable reaches of riparian vegetation cover are almost absent or very homogenous, as in winter wheat fields. Sentinel-2 images provided more accurate results in terms of the range of LAI values. Considering the different types of satellite imagery, the Lambert-Beer equation generally performed best in estimating LAI from the NDVI, especially in areas that are geomorphologically stable or have a denser vegetation cover, such as deciduous forests.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/20/3376riparian vegetationLeaf Area IndexLandsatSentinelPleiades
spellingShingle Giovanni Romano
Giovanni Francesco Ricci
Francesco Gentile
Influence of Different Satellite Imagery on the Analysis of Riparian Leaf Density in a Mountain Stream
Remote Sensing
riparian vegetation
Leaf Area Index
Landsat
Sentinel
Pleiades
title Influence of Different Satellite Imagery on the Analysis of Riparian Leaf Density in a Mountain Stream
title_full Influence of Different Satellite Imagery on the Analysis of Riparian Leaf Density in a Mountain Stream
title_fullStr Influence of Different Satellite Imagery on the Analysis of Riparian Leaf Density in a Mountain Stream
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Different Satellite Imagery on the Analysis of Riparian Leaf Density in a Mountain Stream
title_short Influence of Different Satellite Imagery on the Analysis of Riparian Leaf Density in a Mountain Stream
title_sort influence of different satellite imagery on the analysis of riparian leaf density in a mountain stream
topic riparian vegetation
Leaf Area Index
Landsat
Sentinel
Pleiades
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/20/3376
work_keys_str_mv AT giovanniromano influenceofdifferentsatelliteimageryontheanalysisofriparianleafdensityinamountainstream
AT giovannifrancescoricci influenceofdifferentsatelliteimageryontheanalysisofriparianleafdensityinamountainstream
AT francescogentile influenceofdifferentsatelliteimageryontheanalysisofriparianleafdensityinamountainstream