Food Safety and Food Security: Mapping Relationships

Food safety regulations designed for industrial-scale food producers can create insurmountable challenges when applied to small-scale food producers. These challenges can make for a frustrating environment for food consumers, producers, and regulators, at times leading to tensions between food produ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wanda Martin, Kathleen Perkin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems 2016-10-01
Series:Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/442
_version_ 1797757002944872448
author Wanda Martin
Kathleen Perkin
author_facet Wanda Martin
Kathleen Perkin
author_sort Wanda Martin
collection DOAJ
description Food safety regulations designed for industrial-scale food producers can create insurmountable challenges when applied to small-scale food producers. These challenges can make for a frustrating environment for food consumers, producers, and regulators, at times leading to tensions between food producers and people working in food safety. The objective of this study was to identify ways to reduce these tensions and promote intersectoral collaboration. We used concept mapping, a structured, participatory, mixed-method approach, to solicit ideas and synthesize input from those working in food safety and food security. We sent invitations to 96 individuals working in food safety or food security, and 50 completed the online concept mapping. Twenty-three participated in categorizing and ranking all the resulting statements. The findings were 'mapped' into six clusters: (1) communicating, (2) understanding intent, (3) educating, (4) understanding risk and regulation, (5) recognizing scale, and (6) enhancing partnerships. We further reduced these six clusters into three categories: "relationships," "education," and "context." Although there are no quick or easy ways to ease tensions between those working in food safety and food security, we suggest four practical ways to ease tensions to ensure safe and accessible food: (1) a collaborative group at a high regulatory level that shares authority is needed; (2) building relationships across disciplines should be considered as part of public health work; (3) regulatory documents should be written in plain language; and (4) food safety regulations should account for differences in scale of production with supportive resourcing.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:09:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d5fc336c52864532a7173ef4b1b18452
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2152-0801
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:09:43Z
publishDate 2016-10-01
publisher Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
record_format Article
series Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
spelling doaj.art-d5fc336c52864532a7173ef4b1b184522023-08-02T09:16:40ZengLyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food SystemsJournal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development2152-08012016-10-016210.5304/jafscd.2016.062.001442Food Safety and Food Security: Mapping RelationshipsWanda Martin0Kathleen Perkin1University of VictoriaUniversity of VictoriaFood safety regulations designed for industrial-scale food producers can create insurmountable challenges when applied to small-scale food producers. These challenges can make for a frustrating environment for food consumers, producers, and regulators, at times leading to tensions between food producers and people working in food safety. The objective of this study was to identify ways to reduce these tensions and promote intersectoral collaboration. We used concept mapping, a structured, participatory, mixed-method approach, to solicit ideas and synthesize input from those working in food safety and food security. We sent invitations to 96 individuals working in food safety or food security, and 50 completed the online concept mapping. Twenty-three participated in categorizing and ranking all the resulting statements. The findings were 'mapped' into six clusters: (1) communicating, (2) understanding intent, (3) educating, (4) understanding risk and regulation, (5) recognizing scale, and (6) enhancing partnerships. We further reduced these six clusters into three categories: "relationships," "education," and "context." Although there are no quick or easy ways to ease tensions between those working in food safety and food security, we suggest four practical ways to ease tensions to ensure safe and accessible food: (1) a collaborative group at a high regulatory level that shares authority is needed; (2) building relationships across disciplines should be considered as part of public health work; (3) regulatory documents should be written in plain language; and (4) food safety regulations should account for differences in scale of production with supportive resourcing.https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/442Concept MappingFood SafetyFood SecurityPublic HealthRegulationsSmall-Scale Production
spellingShingle Wanda Martin
Kathleen Perkin
Food Safety and Food Security: Mapping Relationships
Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Concept Mapping
Food Safety
Food Security
Public Health
Regulations
Small-Scale Production
title Food Safety and Food Security: Mapping Relationships
title_full Food Safety and Food Security: Mapping Relationships
title_fullStr Food Safety and Food Security: Mapping Relationships
title_full_unstemmed Food Safety and Food Security: Mapping Relationships
title_short Food Safety and Food Security: Mapping Relationships
title_sort food safety and food security mapping relationships
topic Concept Mapping
Food Safety
Food Security
Public Health
Regulations
Small-Scale Production
url https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/442
work_keys_str_mv AT wandamartin foodsafetyandfoodsecuritymappingrelationships
AT kathleenperkin foodsafetyandfoodsecuritymappingrelationships