The safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system device for carotid artery stenting: A single-center experience from Taiwan

BackgroundProximal protection devices, such as the Mo.Ma system provides better neurological outcomes than the distal filter system in the carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedure. This study first evaluated the safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system during CAS in a single tertiary referral hospital...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng-Chung Cheng, Chin-Sheng Lin, Wei-Hsian Yin, Chin Lin, I-Fan Liu, Yu-Feng Lee, Wei-Ting Liu, Hao-Neng Fu, Chien-Lung Huang, Tien-Ping Tsao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.926513/full
_version_ 1828105221615648768
author Cheng-Chung Cheng
Chin-Sheng Lin
Wei-Hsian Yin
Wei-Hsian Yin
Chin Lin
Chin Lin
I-Fan Liu
I-Fan Liu
Yu-Feng Lee
Wei-Ting Liu
Hao-Neng Fu
Chien-Lung Huang
Chien-Lung Huang
Tien-Ping Tsao
Tien-Ping Tsao
author_facet Cheng-Chung Cheng
Chin-Sheng Lin
Wei-Hsian Yin
Wei-Hsian Yin
Chin Lin
Chin Lin
I-Fan Liu
I-Fan Liu
Yu-Feng Lee
Wei-Ting Liu
Hao-Neng Fu
Chien-Lung Huang
Chien-Lung Huang
Tien-Ping Tsao
Tien-Ping Tsao
author_sort Cheng-Chung Cheng
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundProximal protection devices, such as the Mo.Ma system provides better neurological outcomes than the distal filter system in the carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedure. This study first evaluated the safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system during CAS in a single tertiary referral hospital from Taiwan. The outcomes of distal vs. proximal embolic protection devices were also studied.MethodsA total of 294 patients with carotid artery stenosis who underwent the CAS procedure were retrospectively included and divided into two groups: 152 patients in the distal filter system group and 142 patients in the Mo.Ma system. The outcomes of interest were compared between the two groups. The factors contributing to occlusion intolerance (OI) in the Mo.Ma system were evaluated.ResultsThe procedure success rates were more than 98% in both groups. No major stroke occurred in this study. The minor stroke rates were 2.8% (4/142) and 4.6% (7/152) in the Mo.Ma system and filter system, respectively (p = 0.419). Patients with hypoalbuminemia significantly predicted the risk of stroke with an odds ratio of 0.08 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01–0.68, p = 0.020] per 1 g/day of serum albumin in the filter group. A total of 12 patients developed OI in the Mo.Ma system (12/142, 8%). Low occlusion pressure predicted the occurrence of OI in the Mo.Ma group with the hazard ratios of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82–0.96) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84–0.98) per 1 mmHg of occlusion systolic pressure (OSP) and diastolic pressure (ODP), respectively. We further indicated that patients with an OSP of ≥60 mmHg or an ODP of ≥44 mmHg could tolerate the procedure of occlusion time up to 400 s, while patients with an OSP of <49 mmHg or an ODP of <34 mmHg should undergo the procedure of occlusion time less than 300 s to prevent the occurrence of OI.ConclusionWe have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the Mo.Ma system during CAS in an Asia population. By reducing the occlusion time, our study indicated a lower risk of OI in the Mo.Ma system and proposed the optimal occlusion time according to occlusion pressure to prevent OI during the CAS procedure. Further large-scale and prospective studies are needed to verify our results.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T09:59:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d5fc4891f7304515af537f2b778911a7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T09:59:59Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-d5fc4891f7304515af537f2b778911a72022-12-22T04:30:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2022-09-01910.3389/fcvm.2022.926513926513The safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system device for carotid artery stenting: A single-center experience from TaiwanCheng-Chung Cheng0Chin-Sheng Lin1Wei-Hsian Yin2Wei-Hsian Yin3Chin Lin4Chin Lin5I-Fan Liu6I-Fan Liu7Yu-Feng Lee8Wei-Ting Liu9Hao-Neng Fu10Chien-Lung Huang11Chien-Lung Huang12Tien-Ping Tsao13Tien-Ping Tsao14Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Cardiology, Heart Center, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanFaculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanSchool of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, TaiwanSchool of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Cardiology, Heart Center, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanSchool of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Cardiology, Heart Center, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Cardiology, Heart Center, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanFaculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Cardiology, Heart Center, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanBackgroundProximal protection devices, such as the Mo.Ma system provides better neurological outcomes than the distal filter system in the carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedure. This study first evaluated the safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system during CAS in a single tertiary referral hospital from Taiwan. The outcomes of distal vs. proximal embolic protection devices were also studied.MethodsA total of 294 patients with carotid artery stenosis who underwent the CAS procedure were retrospectively included and divided into two groups: 152 patients in the distal filter system group and 142 patients in the Mo.Ma system. The outcomes of interest were compared between the two groups. The factors contributing to occlusion intolerance (OI) in the Mo.Ma system were evaluated.ResultsThe procedure success rates were more than 98% in both groups. No major stroke occurred in this study. The minor stroke rates were 2.8% (4/142) and 4.6% (7/152) in the Mo.Ma system and filter system, respectively (p = 0.419). Patients with hypoalbuminemia significantly predicted the risk of stroke with an odds ratio of 0.08 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01–0.68, p = 0.020] per 1 g/day of serum albumin in the filter group. A total of 12 patients developed OI in the Mo.Ma system (12/142, 8%). Low occlusion pressure predicted the occurrence of OI in the Mo.Ma group with the hazard ratios of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82–0.96) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84–0.98) per 1 mmHg of occlusion systolic pressure (OSP) and diastolic pressure (ODP), respectively. We further indicated that patients with an OSP of ≥60 mmHg or an ODP of ≥44 mmHg could tolerate the procedure of occlusion time up to 400 s, while patients with an OSP of <49 mmHg or an ODP of <34 mmHg should undergo the procedure of occlusion time less than 300 s to prevent the occurrence of OI.ConclusionWe have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the Mo.Ma system during CAS in an Asia population. By reducing the occlusion time, our study indicated a lower risk of OI in the Mo.Ma system and proposed the optimal occlusion time according to occlusion pressure to prevent OI during the CAS procedure. Further large-scale and prospective studies are needed to verify our results.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.926513/fullproximal protection devicecarotid artery stentingstrokecarotid stenosisocclusion intolerance
spellingShingle Cheng-Chung Cheng
Chin-Sheng Lin
Wei-Hsian Yin
Wei-Hsian Yin
Chin Lin
Chin Lin
I-Fan Liu
I-Fan Liu
Yu-Feng Lee
Wei-Ting Liu
Hao-Neng Fu
Chien-Lung Huang
Chien-Lung Huang
Tien-Ping Tsao
Tien-Ping Tsao
The safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system device for carotid artery stenting: A single-center experience from Taiwan
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
proximal protection device
carotid artery stenting
stroke
carotid stenosis
occlusion intolerance
title The safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system device for carotid artery stenting: A single-center experience from Taiwan
title_full The safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system device for carotid artery stenting: A single-center experience from Taiwan
title_fullStr The safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system device for carotid artery stenting: A single-center experience from Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed The safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system device for carotid artery stenting: A single-center experience from Taiwan
title_short The safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system device for carotid artery stenting: A single-center experience from Taiwan
title_sort safety and efficacy of the mo ma system device for carotid artery stenting a single center experience from taiwan
topic proximal protection device
carotid artery stenting
stroke
carotid stenosis
occlusion intolerance
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.926513/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chengchungcheng thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT chinshenglin thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT weihsianyin thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT weihsianyin thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT chinlin thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT chinlin thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT ifanliu thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT ifanliu thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT yufenglee thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT weitingliu thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT haonengfu thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT chienlunghuang thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT chienlunghuang thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT tienpingtsao thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT tienpingtsao thesafetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT chengchungcheng safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT chinshenglin safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT weihsianyin safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT weihsianyin safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT chinlin safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT chinlin safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT ifanliu safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT ifanliu safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT yufenglee safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT weitingliu safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT haonengfu safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT chienlunghuang safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT chienlunghuang safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT tienpingtsao safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan
AT tienpingtsao safetyandefficacyofthemomasystemdeviceforcarotidarterystentingasinglecenterexperiencefromtaiwan