The pan-immune-inflammation value is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with advanced TNBC treated with first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy: an institutional retrospective analysis

Background: Advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC) has a poor prognosis; thus, there is a need to identify novel biomarkers to guide future research and improve clinical outcomes. Objectives: We tested the prognostic ability of an emerging, complete blood count (CBC)-based inflammatory bioma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonardo Provenzano, Riccardo Lobefaro, Francesca Ligorio, Emma Zattarin, Luca Zambelli, Caterina Sposetti, Daniele Presti, Giulia Montelatici, Angela Ficchì, Antonia Martinetti, Alessio Arata, Marta Del Vecchio, Claudia Lauria Pantano, Barbara Formisano, Giulia Valeria Bianchi, Giuseppe Capri, Filippo de Braud, Claudio Vernieri, Giovanni Fucà
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-04-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359231165978
Description
Summary:Background: Advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC) has a poor prognosis; thus, there is a need to identify novel biomarkers to guide future research and improve clinical outcomes. Objectives: We tested the prognostic ability of an emerging, complete blood count (CBC)-based inflammatory biomarker, the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), in patients with aTNBC treated with first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. Design: This was a retrospective, monocentric, observational study. Methods: We included consecutive aTNBC patients treated with platinum-based, first-line chemotherapy at our Institution, and for whom baseline (C1) CBC data were available. We collected CBC data early on-treatment, when available. PIV was calculated as: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (aBC) were included in a control, non-TNBC cohort. Results: A total of 78 aTNBC patients were included. When evaluated as a continuous variable, PIV-C1 was associated with worse overall survival (OS; p  < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS; p  < 0.001). On the other hand, when PIV-C1 was assessed on the basis of its quantile distribution, patients with ‘high PIV-C1’ experienced worse OS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 4.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.22–8.99; adjusted p  < 0.001] and PFS (adjusted HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.08–3.80; adjusted p  = 0.027) when compared to patients with ‘low PIV-C1’. Higher PIV-C1 was also associated with primary resistance to chemotherapy. Similarly, a higher PIV calculated from CBC at C2D1 (PIV-C2) was associated with worse survival outcomes. We also created a PIV-based score combining information about both PIV-C1 and PIV-C2 and allowing the stratification of patients at low, intermediate, and high risk of death. No association was observed between PIV-C1 and clinical outcomes of HR+/HER2− aBC patients. Conclusion: PIV has a promising prognostic discrimination ability in aTNBC patients treated with first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. Both baseline and early on-treatment PIV are associated with clinical outcomes and may be exploited for creating PIV-based risk classifiers if further validated.
ISSN:1758-8359