Important differences and meaningful changes for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)
Abstract Background We estimated clinically important, group-level differences in self-reported cognitive function for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) instrument. We also investigated individual level change that could be considered meaningful for cancer sur...
Main Authors: | M L Bell, H M Dhillon, V J Bray, J L Vardy |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-018-0071-4 |
Similar Items
-
Clinical Relevance of Physical Function Outcomes in Cancer Cachexia
by: Lucas Caeiro, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01) -
Use of the minimal important difference as a criterion for clinical importance—are we off track?
by: Stefan Moosmayer, MD, PhD
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Clinically Meaningful Difference for the Infant Gastroesophageal Questionnaire Revised version (I-GERQ-R): A Quantitative Synthesis
by: Smith AB, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Determining the Minimal Clinical Important Difference for Medication Quantification Scale III and Morphine Milligram Equivalents in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
by: Lisa Goudman, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
The Meaning and Reliability of Minimal Important Differences (MIDs) for Clinician-Reported Outcome Measures (ClinROMs) in Dermatology—A Scoping Review
by: Reinhart Speeckaert, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01)