Joint-level energetics differentiate isoinertial from speed-power resistance training—a Bayesian analysis
Background There is convincing evidence for the benefits of resistance training on vertical jump improvements, but little evidence to guide optimal training prescription. The inability to detect small between modality effects may partially reflect the use of ANOVA statistics. This study represents t...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018-04-01
|
| Series: | PeerJ |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/4620.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797418762555621376 |
|---|---|
| author | Bernard X.W. Liew Christopher C. Drovandi Samuel Clifford Justin W.L. Keogh Susan Morris Kevin Netto |
| author_facet | Bernard X.W. Liew Christopher C. Drovandi Samuel Clifford Justin W.L. Keogh Susan Morris Kevin Netto |
| author_sort | Bernard X.W. Liew |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background There is convincing evidence for the benefits of resistance training on vertical jump improvements, but little evidence to guide optimal training prescription. The inability to detect small between modality effects may partially reflect the use of ANOVA statistics. This study represents the results of a sub-study from a larger project investigating the effects of two resistance training methods on load carriage running energetics. Bayesian statistics were used to compare the effectiveness of isoinertial resistance against speed-power training to change countermovement jump (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ) height, and joint energetics. Methods Active adults were randomly allocated to either a six-week isoinertial (n = 16; calf raises, leg press, and lunge), or a speed-power training program (n = 14; countermovement jumps, hopping, with hip flexor training to target pre-swing running energetics). Primary outcome variables included jump height and joint power. Bayesian mixed modelling and Functional Data Analysis were used, where significance was determined by a non-zero crossing of the 95% Bayesian Credible Interval (CrI). Results The gain in CMJ height after isoinertial training was 1.95 cm (95% CrI [0.85–3.04] cm) greater than the gain after speed-power training, but the gain in SJ height was similar between groups. In the CMJ, isoinertial training produced a larger increase in power absorption at the hip by a mean 0.018% (equivalent to 35 W) (95% CrI [0.007–0.03]), knee by 0.014% (equivalent to 27 W) (95% CrI [0.006–0.02]) and foot by 0.011% (equivalent to 21 W) (95% CrI [0.005–0.02]) compared to speed-power training. Discussion Short-term isoinertial training improved CMJ height more than speed-power training. The principle adaptive difference between training modalities was at the level of hip, knee and foot power absorption. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:38:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d61473713f7746b1a7e055b70cd4dc08 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2167-8359 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:38:39Z |
| publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
| publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PeerJ |
| spelling | doaj.art-d61473713f7746b1a7e055b70cd4dc082023-12-03T10:55:06ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592018-04-016e462010.7717/peerj.4620Joint-level energetics differentiate isoinertial from speed-power resistance training—a Bayesian analysisBernard X.W. Liew0Christopher C. Drovandi1Samuel Clifford2Justin W.L. Keogh3Susan Morris4Kevin Netto5School of Sports, Exercise, Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United KingdomSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Queensland, AustraliaSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, WA—Western Australia, AustraliaSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, WA—Western Australia, AustraliaBackground There is convincing evidence for the benefits of resistance training on vertical jump improvements, but little evidence to guide optimal training prescription. The inability to detect small between modality effects may partially reflect the use of ANOVA statistics. This study represents the results of a sub-study from a larger project investigating the effects of two resistance training methods on load carriage running energetics. Bayesian statistics were used to compare the effectiveness of isoinertial resistance against speed-power training to change countermovement jump (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ) height, and joint energetics. Methods Active adults were randomly allocated to either a six-week isoinertial (n = 16; calf raises, leg press, and lunge), or a speed-power training program (n = 14; countermovement jumps, hopping, with hip flexor training to target pre-swing running energetics). Primary outcome variables included jump height and joint power. Bayesian mixed modelling and Functional Data Analysis were used, where significance was determined by a non-zero crossing of the 95% Bayesian Credible Interval (CrI). Results The gain in CMJ height after isoinertial training was 1.95 cm (95% CrI [0.85–3.04] cm) greater than the gain after speed-power training, but the gain in SJ height was similar between groups. In the CMJ, isoinertial training produced a larger increase in power absorption at the hip by a mean 0.018% (equivalent to 35 W) (95% CrI [0.007–0.03]), knee by 0.014% (equivalent to 27 W) (95% CrI [0.006–0.02]) and foot by 0.011% (equivalent to 21 W) (95% CrI [0.005–0.02]) compared to speed-power training. Discussion Short-term isoinertial training improved CMJ height more than speed-power training. The principle adaptive difference between training modalities was at the level of hip, knee and foot power absorption.https://peerj.com/articles/4620.pdfVertical jumpKineticsIsoinertialSpeed-powerBayesianBiomechanics |
| spellingShingle | Bernard X.W. Liew Christopher C. Drovandi Samuel Clifford Justin W.L. Keogh Susan Morris Kevin Netto Joint-level energetics differentiate isoinertial from speed-power resistance training—a Bayesian analysis PeerJ Vertical jump Kinetics Isoinertial Speed-power Bayesian Biomechanics |
| title | Joint-level energetics differentiate isoinertial from speed-power resistance training—a Bayesian analysis |
| title_full | Joint-level energetics differentiate isoinertial from speed-power resistance training—a Bayesian analysis |
| title_fullStr | Joint-level energetics differentiate isoinertial from speed-power resistance training—a Bayesian analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Joint-level energetics differentiate isoinertial from speed-power resistance training—a Bayesian analysis |
| title_short | Joint-level energetics differentiate isoinertial from speed-power resistance training—a Bayesian analysis |
| title_sort | joint level energetics differentiate isoinertial from speed power resistance training a bayesian analysis |
| topic | Vertical jump Kinetics Isoinertial Speed-power Bayesian Biomechanics |
| url | https://peerj.com/articles/4620.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bernardxwliew jointlevelenergeticsdifferentiateisoinertialfromspeedpowerresistancetrainingabayesiananalysis AT christophercdrovandi jointlevelenergeticsdifferentiateisoinertialfromspeedpowerresistancetrainingabayesiananalysis AT samuelclifford jointlevelenergeticsdifferentiateisoinertialfromspeedpowerresistancetrainingabayesiananalysis AT justinwlkeogh jointlevelenergeticsdifferentiateisoinertialfromspeedpowerresistancetrainingabayesiananalysis AT susanmorris jointlevelenergeticsdifferentiateisoinertialfromspeedpowerresistancetrainingabayesiananalysis AT kevinnetto jointlevelenergeticsdifferentiateisoinertialfromspeedpowerresistancetrainingabayesiananalysis |