Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohort

Background: COVID-19 pandemic challenged the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. How the COVID-19 pandemic affected HIV retention in care and whether it has disproportionally affected migrant people with HIV (PWH) remained to be investigated. Methods: PWH in ICONA Cohort in follow-up in each of the study perio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberta Gagliardini, Andrea Giacomelli, Giorgio Bozzi, Antonella D'Arminio Monforte, Alessandro Tavelli, Valentina Mazzotta, Elena Bruzzesi, Adriana Cervo, Annalisa Saracino, Cristina Mussini, Enrico Girardi, Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri, Andrea Antinori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-03-01
Series:Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392400005X
_version_ 1827317014900768768
author Roberta Gagliardini
Andrea Giacomelli
Giorgio Bozzi
Antonella D'Arminio Monforte
Alessandro Tavelli
Valentina Mazzotta
Elena Bruzzesi
Adriana Cervo
Annalisa Saracino
Cristina Mussini
Enrico Girardi
Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri
Andrea Antinori
author_facet Roberta Gagliardini
Andrea Giacomelli
Giorgio Bozzi
Antonella D'Arminio Monforte
Alessandro Tavelli
Valentina Mazzotta
Elena Bruzzesi
Adriana Cervo
Annalisa Saracino
Cristina Mussini
Enrico Girardi
Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri
Andrea Antinori
author_sort Roberta Gagliardini
collection DOAJ
description Background: COVID-19 pandemic challenged the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. How the COVID-19 pandemic affected HIV retention in care and whether it has disproportionally affected migrant people with HIV (PWH) remained to be investigated. Methods: PWH in ICONA Cohort in follow-up in each of the study periods were included: 01/09/2019-29/02/2020 (pandemic period) and 01/03/2018-31/08/2018 (historical period, as a control). Risk of temporary loss to follow-up (LTFU, defined as no data recorded for a person for one year) was analyzed by logistic regression, with migrant status as the main exposure variable. Difference in difference (DID) analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic in the different risk of LTFU between natives and migrants. Results: 8864 (17.1% migrants) and 8071 (16.8% migrants) PWH constituted the pandemic and the historical period population, respectively.Proportion of PWH defined as LTFU in the pandemic period was 10.5% in native and 19.6% in migrant PWH.After controlling for age, sex and geographical location of enrolling site, risk of temporary LTFU was higher for migrants than native PWH [adjusted odds ratio 1.85 (95%CI 1.54–2.22)] in pandemic period. In PWH contributing to both periods, LTFU was 9.0% (95% CI 8.3–9.8) in natives vs 17.0% (95% CI 14.7–19.4) in migrants during the pandemic. Instead, LTFU was 1.2% (95%CI 0.9, 1.5) in natives vs 2.2% (95% CI 1.3–3.1) in migrants during the historical period, with a resulting DID of 7.0% (95% CI 4.4–9.6). Conclusions: A greater proportion of LTFU in migrant PWH was observed in both periods, which remained unaltered over time. Interventions to reduce LTFU of migrants are necessary.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T03:13:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d62b2d8bd9fa4359a1c7305bfe98ba54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1873-0442
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T23:25:20Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
spelling doaj.art-d62b2d8bd9fa4359a1c7305bfe98ba542024-03-16T05:08:11ZengElsevierTravel Medicine and Infectious Disease1873-04422024-03-0158102691Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohortRoberta Gagliardini0Andrea Giacomelli1Giorgio Bozzi2Antonella D'Arminio Monforte3Alessandro Tavelli4Valentina Mazzotta5Elena Bruzzesi6Adriana Cervo7Annalisa Saracino8Cristina Mussini9Enrico Girardi10Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri11Andrea Antinori12Clinical and Research Infectious Diseases Department, National Institute of Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, ItalyIII Infectious Disease Unit, ASST-Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, ItalyInfectious Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, ItalyIcona Foundation, Milan, Italy; Corresponding author. Antonella d’Arminio Monforte, Icona Foundation, Milan, Italy.Icona Foundation, Milan, ItalyClinical and Research Infectious Diseases Department, National Institute of Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, ItalyUO Malattie Infettive, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, ItalyDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Modena, Modena, ItalyClinic of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, University of Bari, Bari, ItalyDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Modena, Modena, ItalyScientific Direction, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, ItalyCentre for Clinical Research, Epidemiology, Modelling and Evaluation (CREME), Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UKClinical and Research Infectious Diseases Department, National Institute of Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, ItalyBackground: COVID-19 pandemic challenged the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. How the COVID-19 pandemic affected HIV retention in care and whether it has disproportionally affected migrant people with HIV (PWH) remained to be investigated. Methods: PWH in ICONA Cohort in follow-up in each of the study periods were included: 01/09/2019-29/02/2020 (pandemic period) and 01/03/2018-31/08/2018 (historical period, as a control). Risk of temporary loss to follow-up (LTFU, defined as no data recorded for a person for one year) was analyzed by logistic regression, with migrant status as the main exposure variable. Difference in difference (DID) analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic in the different risk of LTFU between natives and migrants. Results: 8864 (17.1% migrants) and 8071 (16.8% migrants) PWH constituted the pandemic and the historical period population, respectively.Proportion of PWH defined as LTFU in the pandemic period was 10.5% in native and 19.6% in migrant PWH.After controlling for age, sex and geographical location of enrolling site, risk of temporary LTFU was higher for migrants than native PWH [adjusted odds ratio 1.85 (95%CI 1.54–2.22)] in pandemic period. In PWH contributing to both periods, LTFU was 9.0% (95% CI 8.3–9.8) in natives vs 17.0% (95% CI 14.7–19.4) in migrants during the pandemic. Instead, LTFU was 1.2% (95%CI 0.9, 1.5) in natives vs 2.2% (95% CI 1.3–3.1) in migrants during the historical period, with a resulting DID of 7.0% (95% CI 4.4–9.6). Conclusions: A greater proportion of LTFU in migrant PWH was observed in both periods, which remained unaltered over time. Interventions to reduce LTFU of migrants are necessary.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392400005XSARS-CoV-2Retention in careLoss to follow-up
spellingShingle Roberta Gagliardini
Andrea Giacomelli
Giorgio Bozzi
Antonella D'Arminio Monforte
Alessandro Tavelli
Valentina Mazzotta
Elena Bruzzesi
Adriana Cervo
Annalisa Saracino
Cristina Mussini
Enrico Girardi
Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri
Andrea Antinori
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohort
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
SARS-CoV-2
Retention in care
Loss to follow-up
title Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohort
title_full Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohort
title_fullStr Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohort
title_full_unstemmed Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohort
title_short Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohort
title_sort impact of covid 19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with hiv in the icona cohort
topic SARS-CoV-2
Retention in care
Loss to follow-up
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392400005X
work_keys_str_mv AT robertagagliardini impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT andreagiacomelli impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT giorgiobozzi impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT antonelladarminiomonforte impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT alessandrotavelli impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT valentinamazzotta impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT elenabruzzesi impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT adrianacervo impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT annalisasaracino impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT cristinamussini impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT enricogirardi impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT alessandrocozzilepri impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort
AT andreaantinori impactofcovid19pandemiconretentionincareofnativeandmigrantpeoplewithhivintheiconacohort