Comparing Accuracy of Three Methods Based on the GIS Environment for Determining Winching Areas

In forestry interventions such as thinning or selection cutting, appropriate road and skid trail networks are essential for efficient forest operations, but also for limiting damage to the residual stand and soil. Recently, multiple studies have shown the advantage of precision forestry and the use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodolfo Picchio, Francesco Latterini, Piotr S. Mederski, Rachele Venanzi, Zbigniew Karaszewski, Mariusz Bembenek, Michele Croce
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Electronics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/8/1/53
_version_ 1798002453215444992
author Rodolfo Picchio
Francesco Latterini
Piotr S. Mederski
Rachele Venanzi
Zbigniew Karaszewski
Mariusz Bembenek
Michele Croce
author_facet Rodolfo Picchio
Francesco Latterini
Piotr S. Mederski
Rachele Venanzi
Zbigniew Karaszewski
Mariusz Bembenek
Michele Croce
author_sort Rodolfo Picchio
collection DOAJ
description In forestry interventions such as thinning or selection cutting, appropriate road and skid trail networks are essential for efficient forest operations, but also for limiting damage to the residual stand and soil. Recently, multiple studies have shown the advantage of precision forestry and the use of a geographic information system (GIS) in forest road network planning, replacing time-consuming manual measurements and skid trail design directly in the forest. The objective of this research was to test the accuracy of three GIS-based methods, the correct distance method (CDM), real distance buffer method 12 (RDBM12) and real distance buffer method 10 (RDBM10), in estimating the area accessible for winching along skid trails. The study was carried out in two mountain areas, Fibbino and San Martino al Cimino (Italy). All the methods for determining the winching area were based on GIS and digital terrain model (DTM) maps. Additionally, control distances were measured manually in both areas and the results were compared with the distances measured using the GIS methods. The initial results showed that all the methods were useful for determining the winching area in mountain conditions. However, in conclusion, the CDM and RDBM10 methods were more accurate and can be recommended for further use and development.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:52:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d62f1a40ea50440d9f6768638320a307
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-9292
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:52:28Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Electronics
spelling doaj.art-d62f1a40ea50440d9f6768638320a3072022-12-22T04:25:18ZengMDPI AGElectronics2079-92922019-01-01815310.3390/electronics8010053electronics8010053Comparing Accuracy of Three Methods Based on the GIS Environment for Determining Winching AreasRodolfo Picchio0Francesco Latterini1Piotr S. Mederski2Rachele Venanzi3Zbigniew Karaszewski4Mariusz Bembenek5Michele Croce6Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 05010 Viterbo, ItalyDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 05010 Viterbo, ItalyDepartment of Forest Utilisation, Faculty of Forestry, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-625 Poznań, PolandDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 05010 Viterbo, ItalyWood Science and Application Department, Wood Technology Institute, 60-654 Poznań, PolandDepartment of Forest Utilisation, Faculty of Forestry, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-625 Poznań, PolandUmbria Region, Service: Forests, Mountain, Natural Systems; Section: Forest Conservation and Rural Infrastructures, 06121 Perugia, ItalyIn forestry interventions such as thinning or selection cutting, appropriate road and skid trail networks are essential for efficient forest operations, but also for limiting damage to the residual stand and soil. Recently, multiple studies have shown the advantage of precision forestry and the use of a geographic information system (GIS) in forest road network planning, replacing time-consuming manual measurements and skid trail design directly in the forest. The objective of this research was to test the accuracy of three GIS-based methods, the correct distance method (CDM), real distance buffer method 12 (RDBM12) and real distance buffer method 10 (RDBM10), in estimating the area accessible for winching along skid trails. The study was carried out in two mountain areas, Fibbino and San Martino al Cimino (Italy). All the methods for determining the winching area were based on GIS and digital terrain model (DTM) maps. Additionally, control distances were measured manually in both areas and the results were compared with the distances measured using the GIS methods. The initial results showed that all the methods were useful for determining the winching area in mountain conditions. However, in conclusion, the CDM and RDBM10 methods were more accurate and can be recommended for further use and development.http://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/8/1/53forest roadprecision forestryaccessible areaDTM mapsgeographic information system
spellingShingle Rodolfo Picchio
Francesco Latterini
Piotr S. Mederski
Rachele Venanzi
Zbigniew Karaszewski
Mariusz Bembenek
Michele Croce
Comparing Accuracy of Three Methods Based on the GIS Environment for Determining Winching Areas
Electronics
forest road
precision forestry
accessible area
DTM maps
geographic information system
title Comparing Accuracy of Three Methods Based on the GIS Environment for Determining Winching Areas
title_full Comparing Accuracy of Three Methods Based on the GIS Environment for Determining Winching Areas
title_fullStr Comparing Accuracy of Three Methods Based on the GIS Environment for Determining Winching Areas
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Accuracy of Three Methods Based on the GIS Environment for Determining Winching Areas
title_short Comparing Accuracy of Three Methods Based on the GIS Environment for Determining Winching Areas
title_sort comparing accuracy of three methods based on the gis environment for determining winching areas
topic forest road
precision forestry
accessible area
DTM maps
geographic information system
url http://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/8/1/53
work_keys_str_mv AT rodolfopicchio comparingaccuracyofthreemethodsbasedonthegisenvironmentfordeterminingwinchingareas
AT francescolatterini comparingaccuracyofthreemethodsbasedonthegisenvironmentfordeterminingwinchingareas
AT piotrsmederski comparingaccuracyofthreemethodsbasedonthegisenvironmentfordeterminingwinchingareas
AT rachelevenanzi comparingaccuracyofthreemethodsbasedonthegisenvironmentfordeterminingwinchingareas
AT zbigniewkaraszewski comparingaccuracyofthreemethodsbasedonthegisenvironmentfordeterminingwinchingareas
AT mariuszbembenek comparingaccuracyofthreemethodsbasedonthegisenvironmentfordeterminingwinchingareas
AT michelecroce comparingaccuracyofthreemethodsbasedonthegisenvironmentfordeterminingwinchingareas