Effects of Improved Street Lighting on Crime
Improved street lighting serves many functions and is used in both public and private settings. The prevention of personal and property crime is one of its objectives in public space, which is the main focus of this systematic review. There are two main theories of why improved street lighting may c...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2008-01-01
|
Series: | Campbell Systematic Reviews |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2008.13 |
_version_ | 1819094044294250496 |
---|---|
author | Dr Brandon C. Welsh Dr David P. Farrington |
author_facet | Dr Brandon C. Welsh Dr David P. Farrington |
author_sort | Dr Brandon C. Welsh |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Improved street lighting serves many functions and is used in both public and private settings. The prevention of personal and property crime is one of its objectives in public space, which is the main focus of this systematic review. There are two main theories of why improved street lighting may cause a reduction in crime. The first suggests that improved lighting leads to increased surveillance of potential offenders (both by improving visibility and by increasing the number of people on the street) and hence to increased deterrence of potential offenders. The second suggests that improved lighting signals community investment in the area and that the area is improving, leading to increased community pride, community cohesiveness, and informal social control. The first theory predicts decreases in crime especially during the hours of darkness, while the second theory predicts decreases in crime during both daytime and nighttime. Results of this review indicate that improved street lighting significantly reduces crime. This lends support for the continued use of improved street lighting to prevent crime in public space. The review also found that nighttime crimes did not decrease more than daytime crimes. This suggests that a theory of street lighting focusing on its role in increasing community pride and informal social control may be more plausible than a theory focusing on increased surveillance and increased deterrence. Future research should be designed to test the main theories of the effects of improved street lighting more explicitly, and future lighting schemes should employ high quality evaluation designs with long‐term followups. Abstract Background Improved street lighting is intended to serve many purposes, one of them being the prevention of crime. While street lighting improvements may not often be implemented with the expressed aim of preventing crime – pedestrian safety and traffic safety may be viewed as more important aims – and the notion of lighting streets to deter lurking criminals may be too simplistic, its relevance to the prevention of crime has been suggested in urban centers, residential areas, and other places frequented by criminals and potential victims. Objectives The main objective of this review is to assess the available research evidence on the effects of improved street lighting on crime in public space. In addition to assessing the overall impact of improved street lighting on crime, this review will also investigate in which settings, against which crimes, and under what conditions it is most effective. Search strategy Four search strategies were employed to identify studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review: (1) searches of electronic bibliographic databases; (2) searches of literature reviews on the effectiveness of improved street lighting in preventing crime; (3) searches of bibliographies of street lighting studies; and (4) contacts with leading researchers. Both published and unpublished reports were considered in the searches. Searches were international in scope and were not limited to the English language. Selection criteria Studies that investigated the effects of improved street lighting on crime were included. For studies involving one or more other interventions, only those studies in which improved street lighting was the main intervention were included. Studies were included if they had, at a minimum, an evaluation design that involved before‐and‐after measures of crime in experimental and control areas. There needed to be at least one experimental area and one reasonably comparable control area. Data collection & analysis Narrative findings are reported for the 13 studies included in this review. A meta‐analysis of all 13 of these studies was carried out. The “relative effect size” or RES (which can be interpreted as an incident rate ration) was used to measure effect size. Results are reported for total crime and, where possible, property and violent crime categories using (mostly) official data. In the case of studies that measure the impact of improved street lighting programs on crime at multiple points in time, similar time periods before and after are compared (as far as possible). The review also addresses displacement of crime and diffusion of crime prevention benefits. Main results The studies included in this systematic review indicate that improved street lighting significantly reduces crime, is more effective in reducing crime in the United Kingdom than in the United States, and that nighttime crimes do not decrease more than daytime crimes. Reviewers’ conclusions We conclude that improved street lighting should continue to be used to prevent crime in public areas. It has few negative effects and clear benefits for law‐abiding citizens. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T23:21:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d63e2347eaf44e4b8fa0793012b0d15a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1891-1803 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T23:21:09Z |
publishDate | 2008-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Campbell Systematic Reviews |
spelling | doaj.art-d63e2347eaf44e4b8fa0793012b0d15a2022-12-21T18:46:48ZengWileyCampbell Systematic Reviews1891-18032008-01-014115110.4073/csr.2008.13Effects of Improved Street Lighting on CrimeDr Brandon C. Welsh0Dr David P. Farrington1Department of Criminal Justice and CriminologyUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell870 Broadway Street, Suite 2LowellMA01854‐3044USAInstitute of CriminologyCambridge UniversitySigwick SiteCambridgeCB3 9DTUnited KingdomImproved street lighting serves many functions and is used in both public and private settings. The prevention of personal and property crime is one of its objectives in public space, which is the main focus of this systematic review. There are two main theories of why improved street lighting may cause a reduction in crime. The first suggests that improved lighting leads to increased surveillance of potential offenders (both by improving visibility and by increasing the number of people on the street) and hence to increased deterrence of potential offenders. The second suggests that improved lighting signals community investment in the area and that the area is improving, leading to increased community pride, community cohesiveness, and informal social control. The first theory predicts decreases in crime especially during the hours of darkness, while the second theory predicts decreases in crime during both daytime and nighttime. Results of this review indicate that improved street lighting significantly reduces crime. This lends support for the continued use of improved street lighting to prevent crime in public space. The review also found that nighttime crimes did not decrease more than daytime crimes. This suggests that a theory of street lighting focusing on its role in increasing community pride and informal social control may be more plausible than a theory focusing on increased surveillance and increased deterrence. Future research should be designed to test the main theories of the effects of improved street lighting more explicitly, and future lighting schemes should employ high quality evaluation designs with long‐term followups. Abstract Background Improved street lighting is intended to serve many purposes, one of them being the prevention of crime. While street lighting improvements may not often be implemented with the expressed aim of preventing crime – pedestrian safety and traffic safety may be viewed as more important aims – and the notion of lighting streets to deter lurking criminals may be too simplistic, its relevance to the prevention of crime has been suggested in urban centers, residential areas, and other places frequented by criminals and potential victims. Objectives The main objective of this review is to assess the available research evidence on the effects of improved street lighting on crime in public space. In addition to assessing the overall impact of improved street lighting on crime, this review will also investigate in which settings, against which crimes, and under what conditions it is most effective. Search strategy Four search strategies were employed to identify studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review: (1) searches of electronic bibliographic databases; (2) searches of literature reviews on the effectiveness of improved street lighting in preventing crime; (3) searches of bibliographies of street lighting studies; and (4) contacts with leading researchers. Both published and unpublished reports were considered in the searches. Searches were international in scope and were not limited to the English language. Selection criteria Studies that investigated the effects of improved street lighting on crime were included. For studies involving one or more other interventions, only those studies in which improved street lighting was the main intervention were included. Studies were included if they had, at a minimum, an evaluation design that involved before‐and‐after measures of crime in experimental and control areas. There needed to be at least one experimental area and one reasonably comparable control area. Data collection & analysis Narrative findings are reported for the 13 studies included in this review. A meta‐analysis of all 13 of these studies was carried out. The “relative effect size” or RES (which can be interpreted as an incident rate ration) was used to measure effect size. Results are reported for total crime and, where possible, property and violent crime categories using (mostly) official data. In the case of studies that measure the impact of improved street lighting programs on crime at multiple points in time, similar time periods before and after are compared (as far as possible). The review also addresses displacement of crime and diffusion of crime prevention benefits. Main results The studies included in this systematic review indicate that improved street lighting significantly reduces crime, is more effective in reducing crime in the United Kingdom than in the United States, and that nighttime crimes do not decrease more than daytime crimes. Reviewers’ conclusions We conclude that improved street lighting should continue to be used to prevent crime in public areas. It has few negative effects and clear benefits for law‐abiding citizens.https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2008.13 |
spellingShingle | Dr Brandon C. Welsh Dr David P. Farrington Effects of Improved Street Lighting on Crime Campbell Systematic Reviews |
title | Effects of Improved Street Lighting on Crime |
title_full | Effects of Improved Street Lighting on Crime |
title_fullStr | Effects of Improved Street Lighting on Crime |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Improved Street Lighting on Crime |
title_short | Effects of Improved Street Lighting on Crime |
title_sort | effects of improved street lighting on crime |
url | https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2008.13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drbrandoncwelsh effectsofimprovedstreetlightingoncrime AT drdavidpfarrington effectsofimprovedstreetlightingoncrime |