Driver Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About Deer–Vehicle Collisions in Southern Michigan

Deer–vehicle collisions (DVCs) are one of the most frequent and costly human– wildlife conflict throughout the range of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). We conducted a self-administered, mail-back survey of Michigan drivers to determine: (1) driver attitudes and knowledge about DVCs; (2)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alix Marcoux, Shawn J. Riley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utah State University 2017-02-01
Series:Human-Wildlife Interactions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol4/iss1/7
_version_ 1818327829599748096
author Alix Marcoux
Shawn J. Riley
author_facet Alix Marcoux
Shawn J. Riley
author_sort Alix Marcoux
collection DOAJ
description Deer–vehicle collisions (DVCs) are one of the most frequent and costly human– wildlife conflict throughout the range of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). We conducted a self-administered, mail-back survey of Michigan drivers to determine: (1) driver attitudes and knowledge about DVCs; (2) reporting rates of DVCs; and (3) effects of being in a DVC on attitudes toward desired deer population levels. From a sample of 3,600 randomly selected licensed drivers >18 years of age in southeast Michigan, we obtained 1,653 completed questionnaires (48% response rate). Although 18% of respondents reported experiencing >1 DVC within 5 years of the survey and 81% of them perceived DVCs to be a serious problem, drivers stated a willingness to make only modest changes in their driving behavior to minimize risk of a DVC. Most respondents (79%) believed DVCs were unavoidable. Only 46% of drivers involved in >1 DVCs indicated that they reported it to police, and 52% reported the DVC to their insurance company. Drivers involved in DVCs were more likely than other drivers to be male, drive more, be more knowledgeable about DVCs, and be more likely to desire a decrease in the deer population. If reporting rates revealed in this study are an indication of rates elsewhere, DVCs are a much greater hazard than previously estimated.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T12:22:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d640ae30b41f4716a62f28732ebe8a13
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2155-3874
2155-3874
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T12:22:29Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher Utah State University
record_format Article
series Human-Wildlife Interactions
spelling doaj.art-d640ae30b41f4716a62f28732ebe8a132022-12-21T23:46:33ZengUtah State UniversityHuman-Wildlife Interactions2155-38742155-38742017-02-014110.26077/td9a-wf33Driver Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About Deer–Vehicle Collisions in Southern MichiganAlix Marcoux0Shawn J. Riley1Michigan State UniversityMichigan State UniversityDeer–vehicle collisions (DVCs) are one of the most frequent and costly human– wildlife conflict throughout the range of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). We conducted a self-administered, mail-back survey of Michigan drivers to determine: (1) driver attitudes and knowledge about DVCs; (2) reporting rates of DVCs; and (3) effects of being in a DVC on attitudes toward desired deer population levels. From a sample of 3,600 randomly selected licensed drivers >18 years of age in southeast Michigan, we obtained 1,653 completed questionnaires (48% response rate). Although 18% of respondents reported experiencing >1 DVC within 5 years of the survey and 81% of them perceived DVCs to be a serious problem, drivers stated a willingness to make only modest changes in their driving behavior to minimize risk of a DVC. Most respondents (79%) believed DVCs were unavoidable. Only 46% of drivers involved in >1 DVCs indicated that they reported it to police, and 52% reported the DVC to their insurance company. Drivers involved in DVCs were more likely than other drivers to be male, drive more, be more knowledgeable about DVCs, and be more likely to desire a decrease in the deer population. If reporting rates revealed in this study are an indication of rates elsewhere, DVCs are a much greater hazard than previously estimated.https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol4/iss1/7deer–vehicle collisionshuman–wildlife conflictsmichiganodocoileus virginianusreporting rateswhite-tailed deer
spellingShingle Alix Marcoux
Shawn J. Riley
Driver Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About Deer–Vehicle Collisions in Southern Michigan
Human-Wildlife Interactions
deer–vehicle collisions
human–wildlife conflicts
michigan
odocoileus virginianus
reporting rates
white-tailed deer
title Driver Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About Deer–Vehicle Collisions in Southern Michigan
title_full Driver Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About Deer–Vehicle Collisions in Southern Michigan
title_fullStr Driver Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About Deer–Vehicle Collisions in Southern Michigan
title_full_unstemmed Driver Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About Deer–Vehicle Collisions in Southern Michigan
title_short Driver Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About Deer–Vehicle Collisions in Southern Michigan
title_sort driver knowledge beliefs and attitudes about deer vehicle collisions in southern michigan
topic deer–vehicle collisions
human–wildlife conflicts
michigan
odocoileus virginianus
reporting rates
white-tailed deer
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol4/iss1/7
work_keys_str_mv AT alixmarcoux driverknowledgebeliefsandattitudesaboutdeervehiclecollisionsinsouthernmichigan
AT shawnjriley driverknowledgebeliefsandattitudesaboutdeervehiclecollisionsinsouthernmichigan