Comparing the nutritional composition of foods and beverages in the Canadian Nutrient File to a large representative database of Canadian prepackaged foods and beverages.

<h4>Background</h4>Nutrient information used to code dietary intakes in the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) may not be reflective of the current Canadian food supply and could result in inaccurate evaluations of nutrient exposures.<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the nutr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jodi T Bernstein, Anthea K Christoforou, Nadia Flexner, Mary R L'Abbe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280028
_version_ 1797847189521694720
author Jodi T Bernstein
Anthea K Christoforou
Nadia Flexner
Mary R L'Abbe
author_facet Jodi T Bernstein
Anthea K Christoforou
Nadia Flexner
Mary R L'Abbe
author_sort Jodi T Bernstein
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Nutrient information used to code dietary intakes in the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) may not be reflective of the current Canadian food supply and could result in inaccurate evaluations of nutrient exposures.<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the nutritional compositions of foods in the CCHS 2015 Food and Ingredient Details (FID) file (n = 2,785) to a large representative Canadian database of branded food and beverage products (Food Label Information Program, FLIP) collected in 2017 (n = 20,625).<h4>Method</h4>Food products in the FLIP database were matched to equivalent generic foods from the FID file to create new aggregate food profiles based on FLIP nutrient data. Mann Whitney U tests were used to compare nutrient compositions between the FID and FLIP food profiles.<h4>Results</h4>In most food categories and nutrients there were no statistically significant differences between the FLIP and FID food profiles. Nutrients with the largest differences included: saturated fats (n = 9 of 21 categories), fiber (n = 7), cholesterol (n = 6), and total fats (n = 4). The meats and alternatives category had the most nutrients with significant differences.<h4>Conclusion</h4>These results can be used to prioritize future updates and collections of food composition databases, while also providing insights for interpreting CCHS 2015 nutrient intakes.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T18:08:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d655aeca759c42fc94afa395135ced2f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T18:08:22Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-d655aeca759c42fc94afa395135ced2f2023-04-14T05:31:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01183e028002810.1371/journal.pone.0280028Comparing the nutritional composition of foods and beverages in the Canadian Nutrient File to a large representative database of Canadian prepackaged foods and beverages.Jodi T BernsteinAnthea K ChristoforouNadia FlexnerMary R L'Abbe<h4>Background</h4>Nutrient information used to code dietary intakes in the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) may not be reflective of the current Canadian food supply and could result in inaccurate evaluations of nutrient exposures.<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the nutritional compositions of foods in the CCHS 2015 Food and Ingredient Details (FID) file (n = 2,785) to a large representative Canadian database of branded food and beverage products (Food Label Information Program, FLIP) collected in 2017 (n = 20,625).<h4>Method</h4>Food products in the FLIP database were matched to equivalent generic foods from the FID file to create new aggregate food profiles based on FLIP nutrient data. Mann Whitney U tests were used to compare nutrient compositions between the FID and FLIP food profiles.<h4>Results</h4>In most food categories and nutrients there were no statistically significant differences between the FLIP and FID food profiles. Nutrients with the largest differences included: saturated fats (n = 9 of 21 categories), fiber (n = 7), cholesterol (n = 6), and total fats (n = 4). The meats and alternatives category had the most nutrients with significant differences.<h4>Conclusion</h4>These results can be used to prioritize future updates and collections of food composition databases, while also providing insights for interpreting CCHS 2015 nutrient intakes.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280028
spellingShingle Jodi T Bernstein
Anthea K Christoforou
Nadia Flexner
Mary R L'Abbe
Comparing the nutritional composition of foods and beverages in the Canadian Nutrient File to a large representative database of Canadian prepackaged foods and beverages.
PLoS ONE
title Comparing the nutritional composition of foods and beverages in the Canadian Nutrient File to a large representative database of Canadian prepackaged foods and beverages.
title_full Comparing the nutritional composition of foods and beverages in the Canadian Nutrient File to a large representative database of Canadian prepackaged foods and beverages.
title_fullStr Comparing the nutritional composition of foods and beverages in the Canadian Nutrient File to a large representative database of Canadian prepackaged foods and beverages.
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the nutritional composition of foods and beverages in the Canadian Nutrient File to a large representative database of Canadian prepackaged foods and beverages.
title_short Comparing the nutritional composition of foods and beverages in the Canadian Nutrient File to a large representative database of Canadian prepackaged foods and beverages.
title_sort comparing the nutritional composition of foods and beverages in the canadian nutrient file to a large representative database of canadian prepackaged foods and beverages
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280028
work_keys_str_mv AT joditbernstein comparingthenutritionalcompositionoffoodsandbeveragesinthecanadiannutrientfiletoalargerepresentativedatabaseofcanadianprepackagedfoodsandbeverages
AT antheakchristoforou comparingthenutritionalcompositionoffoodsandbeveragesinthecanadiannutrientfiletoalargerepresentativedatabaseofcanadianprepackagedfoodsandbeverages
AT nadiaflexner comparingthenutritionalcompositionoffoodsandbeveragesinthecanadiannutrientfiletoalargerepresentativedatabaseofcanadianprepackagedfoodsandbeverages
AT maryrlabbe comparingthenutritionalcompositionoffoodsandbeveragesinthecanadiannutrientfiletoalargerepresentativedatabaseofcanadianprepackagedfoodsandbeverages