The Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Composite Resins and Glass Ionomer Cement to White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: An in Vitro Study

Aim : The aim of this study was to evaluate & compare the shear bond strength of different restorative composite resins and glass ionomer cement over white mineral trioxide aggregate. Method: Forty specimens of White MTA were condensed into cavities prepared in acrylic blocks and divided into f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B Devi Priya, Aruna Kumari Ganapathi, Sohani Maroli, K J Ramesh, Phani Himaja Vaaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Advances in Human Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2016;volume=6;issue=1;spage=16;epage=24;aulast=Priya;type=0
_version_ 1811333421567311872
author B Devi Priya
Aruna Kumari Ganapathi
Sohani Maroli
K J Ramesh
Phani Himaja Vaaka
author_facet B Devi Priya
Aruna Kumari Ganapathi
Sohani Maroli
K J Ramesh
Phani Himaja Vaaka
author_sort B Devi Priya
collection DOAJ
description Aim : The aim of this study was to evaluate & compare the shear bond strength of different restorative composite resins and glass ionomer cement over white mineral trioxide aggregate. Method: Forty specimens of White MTA were condensed into cavities prepared in acrylic blocks and divided into four groups (ten each). In group one, Adper single bond (two-step ′total- etch adhesive′) bonding agent and Z250 composite, in group two Xeno V one component self-etching adhesive bonding agent and CeramX Mono composite, in group three Vertise Flow flowable composite and in group four Glass ionomer cement were placed over White MTA. The shear bond strength was measured in the universal testing machine and the results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance test. Results: Adper single bond 2 and Z250 composite had statistically significant (p<0.005) higher shear bond strength values than Xeno V and Ceram X Mono composite, Vertise Flow and GIC. Conclusion: The placement of composite Z250, used with Adper single bond, over White MTA as final restoration may be appropriate.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:52:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d65befe8d8d04623a9732c9f00452e9a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2321-8568
2348-4691
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:52:28Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Advances in Human Biology
spelling doaj.art-d65befe8d8d04623a9732c9f00452e9a2022-12-22T02:38:55ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAdvances in Human Biology2321-85682348-46912016-01-01611624The Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Composite Resins and Glass Ionomer Cement to White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: An in Vitro StudyB Devi PriyaAruna Kumari GanapathiSohani MaroliK J RameshPhani Himaja VaakaAim : The aim of this study was to evaluate & compare the shear bond strength of different restorative composite resins and glass ionomer cement over white mineral trioxide aggregate. Method: Forty specimens of White MTA were condensed into cavities prepared in acrylic blocks and divided into four groups (ten each). In group one, Adper single bond (two-step ′total- etch adhesive′) bonding agent and Z250 composite, in group two Xeno V one component self-etching adhesive bonding agent and CeramX Mono composite, in group three Vertise Flow flowable composite and in group four Glass ionomer cement were placed over White MTA. The shear bond strength was measured in the universal testing machine and the results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance test. Results: Adper single bond 2 and Z250 composite had statistically significant (p<0.005) higher shear bond strength values than Xeno V and Ceram X Mono composite, Vertise Flow and GIC. Conclusion: The placement of composite Z250, used with Adper single bond, over White MTA as final restoration may be appropriate.http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2016;volume=6;issue=1;spage=16;epage=24;aulast=Priya;type=0Composite resinGlass ionomerMineral trioxide aggregate.
spellingShingle B Devi Priya
Aruna Kumari Ganapathi
Sohani Maroli
K J Ramesh
Phani Himaja Vaaka
The Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Composite Resins and Glass Ionomer Cement to White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: An in Vitro Study
Advances in Human Biology
Composite resin
Glass ionomer
Mineral trioxide aggregate.
title The Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Composite Resins and Glass Ionomer Cement to White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: An in Vitro Study
title_full The Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Composite Resins and Glass Ionomer Cement to White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: An in Vitro Study
title_fullStr The Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Composite Resins and Glass Ionomer Cement to White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: An in Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed The Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Composite Resins and Glass Ionomer Cement to White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: An in Vitro Study
title_short The Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Composite Resins and Glass Ionomer Cement to White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: An in Vitro Study
title_sort evaluation of shear bond strength of different restorative composite resins and glass ionomer cement to white mineral trioxide aggregate an in vitro study
topic Composite resin
Glass ionomer
Mineral trioxide aggregate.
url http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2016;volume=6;issue=1;spage=16;epage=24;aulast=Priya;type=0
work_keys_str_mv AT bdevipriya theevaluationofshearbondstrengthofdifferentrestorativecompositeresinsandglassionomercementtowhitemineraltrioxideaggregateaninvitrostudy
AT arunakumariganapathi theevaluationofshearbondstrengthofdifferentrestorativecompositeresinsandglassionomercementtowhitemineraltrioxideaggregateaninvitrostudy
AT sohanimaroli theevaluationofshearbondstrengthofdifferentrestorativecompositeresinsandglassionomercementtowhitemineraltrioxideaggregateaninvitrostudy
AT kjramesh theevaluationofshearbondstrengthofdifferentrestorativecompositeresinsandglassionomercementtowhitemineraltrioxideaggregateaninvitrostudy
AT phanihimajavaaka theevaluationofshearbondstrengthofdifferentrestorativecompositeresinsandglassionomercementtowhitemineraltrioxideaggregateaninvitrostudy
AT bdevipriya evaluationofshearbondstrengthofdifferentrestorativecompositeresinsandglassionomercementtowhitemineraltrioxideaggregateaninvitrostudy
AT arunakumariganapathi evaluationofshearbondstrengthofdifferentrestorativecompositeresinsandglassionomercementtowhitemineraltrioxideaggregateaninvitrostudy
AT sohanimaroli evaluationofshearbondstrengthofdifferentrestorativecompositeresinsandglassionomercementtowhitemineraltrioxideaggregateaninvitrostudy
AT kjramesh evaluationofshearbondstrengthofdifferentrestorativecompositeresinsandglassionomercementtowhitemineraltrioxideaggregateaninvitrostudy
AT phanihimajavaaka evaluationofshearbondstrengthofdifferentrestorativecompositeresinsandglassionomercementtowhitemineraltrioxideaggregateaninvitrostudy