Direct-Acting Antivirals Remain Cost-Effective Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C in Australia Despite Changes to the Treated Population and the Availability of Retreatment: The Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®) Example
Abstract Introduction The first direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were reimbursed via Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in March 2016. This was based on the recommendation from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) th...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Adis, Springer Healthcare
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Infectious Diseases and Therapy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-00926-1 |
| Summary: | Abstract Introduction The first direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were reimbursed via Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in March 2016. This was based on the recommendation from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) that the regimens would be acceptably cost-effective at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) no greater than $15,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Since the initial PBS listings for DAA therapies and subsequent listings of newer DAA treatments such as glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Maviret®), the demographics and some of the disease characteristics of currently treated patients have markedly changed. This analysis aims to reassess the cost-effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, accounting for the changes to the HCV population currently seeking treatment and incorporating retreatment in first-line failures and the treatment of new infections in previously treated individuals. Methods To assess the cost-effectiveness 7 years after initial listing of DAAs, an update was made to the Markov model used to achieve PBS reimbursement for Viekira-Pak® in May 2016. Amendments to the Viekira-Pak® model include: changes to baseline age and fibrosis distribution of treated patients, and inclusion of retreatment of first-line failures [those not achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR12)] and reinfected individuals. Treatment-related inputs including SVR12 response rates, adverse events, treatment-related disutility, and discontinuations were sourced from pivotal glecaprevir/pibrentasvir clinical trials. Results Using the published price of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, the ICER is below $15,000/QALY. Conclusions Despite changes in demographics and disease characteristics of treated patients, and changes to the model structure to reflect retreatment in clinical practice in Australia, DAAs remain cost-effective in 2023. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2193-8229 2193-6382 |