Direct-Acting Antivirals Remain Cost-Effective Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C in Australia Despite Changes to the Treated Population and the Availability of Retreatment: The Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®) Example

Abstract Introduction The first direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were reimbursed via Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in March 2016. This was based on the recommendation from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma Warren, Belinda J. C. Castles, Gillian C. Sharratt, Aitor Arteaga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2024-03-01
Series:Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-00926-1
_version_ 1797233422341505024
author Emma Warren
Belinda J. C. Castles
Gillian C. Sharratt
Aitor Arteaga
author_facet Emma Warren
Belinda J. C. Castles
Gillian C. Sharratt
Aitor Arteaga
author_sort Emma Warren
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction The first direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were reimbursed via Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in March 2016. This was based on the recommendation from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) that the regimens would be acceptably cost-effective at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) no greater than $15,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Since the initial PBS listings for DAA therapies and subsequent listings of newer DAA treatments such as glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Maviret®), the demographics and some of the disease characteristics of currently treated patients have markedly changed. This analysis aims to reassess the cost-effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, accounting for the changes to the HCV population currently seeking treatment and incorporating retreatment in first-line failures and the treatment of new infections in previously treated individuals. Methods To assess the cost-effectiveness 7 years after initial listing of DAAs, an update was made to the Markov model used to achieve PBS reimbursement for Viekira-Pak® in May 2016. Amendments to the Viekira-Pak® model include: changes to baseline age and fibrosis distribution of treated patients, and inclusion of retreatment of first-line failures [those not achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR12)] and reinfected individuals. Treatment-related inputs including SVR12 response rates, adverse events, treatment-related disutility, and discontinuations were sourced from pivotal glecaprevir/pibrentasvir clinical trials. Results Using the published price of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, the ICER is below $15,000/QALY. Conclusions Despite changes in demographics and disease characteristics of treated patients, and changes to the model structure to reflect retreatment in clinical practice in Australia, DAAs remain cost-effective in 2023.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T16:15:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d660c8b161014f8eaf2a50959ca6bfb8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2193-8229
2193-6382
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T16:15:55Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Adis, Springer Healthcare
record_format Article
series Infectious Diseases and Therapy
spelling doaj.art-d660c8b161014f8eaf2a50959ca6bfb82024-03-31T11:27:27ZengAdis, Springer HealthcareInfectious Diseases and Therapy2193-82292193-63822024-03-0113354956410.1007/s40121-024-00926-1Direct-Acting Antivirals Remain Cost-Effective Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C in Australia Despite Changes to the Treated Population and the Availability of Retreatment: The Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®) ExampleEmma Warren0Belinda J. C. Castles1Gillian C. Sharratt2Aitor Arteaga3HERA Consulting Australia Pty Ltd.AbbVie PTY LTD.AbbVie PTY LTD.AbbVie PTY LTD.Abstract Introduction The first direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were reimbursed via Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in March 2016. This was based on the recommendation from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) that the regimens would be acceptably cost-effective at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) no greater than $15,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Since the initial PBS listings for DAA therapies and subsequent listings of newer DAA treatments such as glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Maviret®), the demographics and some of the disease characteristics of currently treated patients have markedly changed. This analysis aims to reassess the cost-effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, accounting for the changes to the HCV population currently seeking treatment and incorporating retreatment in first-line failures and the treatment of new infections in previously treated individuals. Methods To assess the cost-effectiveness 7 years after initial listing of DAAs, an update was made to the Markov model used to achieve PBS reimbursement for Viekira-Pak® in May 2016. Amendments to the Viekira-Pak® model include: changes to baseline age and fibrosis distribution of treated patients, and inclusion of retreatment of first-line failures [those not achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR12)] and reinfected individuals. Treatment-related inputs including SVR12 response rates, adverse events, treatment-related disutility, and discontinuations were sourced from pivotal glecaprevir/pibrentasvir clinical trials. Results Using the published price of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, the ICER is below $15,000/QALY. Conclusions Despite changes in demographics and disease characteristics of treated patients, and changes to the model structure to reflect retreatment in clinical practice in Australia, DAAs remain cost-effective in 2023.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-00926-1Economic modelingCost-effectivenessHealth technology assessmentHepatitis CAustralia
spellingShingle Emma Warren
Belinda J. C. Castles
Gillian C. Sharratt
Aitor Arteaga
Direct-Acting Antivirals Remain Cost-Effective Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C in Australia Despite Changes to the Treated Population and the Availability of Retreatment: The Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®) Example
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Economic modeling
Cost-effectiveness
Health technology assessment
Hepatitis C
Australia
title Direct-Acting Antivirals Remain Cost-Effective Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C in Australia Despite Changes to the Treated Population and the Availability of Retreatment: The Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®) Example
title_full Direct-Acting Antivirals Remain Cost-Effective Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C in Australia Despite Changes to the Treated Population and the Availability of Retreatment: The Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®) Example
title_fullStr Direct-Acting Antivirals Remain Cost-Effective Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C in Australia Despite Changes to the Treated Population and the Availability of Retreatment: The Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®) Example
title_full_unstemmed Direct-Acting Antivirals Remain Cost-Effective Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C in Australia Despite Changes to the Treated Population and the Availability of Retreatment: The Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®) Example
title_short Direct-Acting Antivirals Remain Cost-Effective Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C in Australia Despite Changes to the Treated Population and the Availability of Retreatment: The Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (Maviret®) Example
title_sort direct acting antivirals remain cost effective treatments for chronic hepatitis c in australia despite changes to the treated population and the availability of retreatment the glecaprevir pibrentasvir maviret r example
topic Economic modeling
Cost-effectiveness
Health technology assessment
Hepatitis C
Australia
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-00926-1
work_keys_str_mv AT emmawarren directactingantiviralsremaincosteffectivetreatmentsforchronichepatitiscinaustraliadespitechangestothetreatedpopulationandtheavailabilityofretreatmenttheglecaprevirpibrentasvirmaviretexample
AT belindajccastles directactingantiviralsremaincosteffectivetreatmentsforchronichepatitiscinaustraliadespitechangestothetreatedpopulationandtheavailabilityofretreatmenttheglecaprevirpibrentasvirmaviretexample
AT gilliancsharratt directactingantiviralsremaincosteffectivetreatmentsforchronichepatitiscinaustraliadespitechangestothetreatedpopulationandtheavailabilityofretreatmenttheglecaprevirpibrentasvirmaviretexample
AT aitorarteaga directactingantiviralsremaincosteffectivetreatmentsforchronichepatitiscinaustraliadespitechangestothetreatedpopulationandtheavailabilityofretreatmenttheglecaprevirpibrentasvirmaviretexample