Management of Double Sensitization to Vespids in Europe

Wasp allergy with a diagnostic profile of double sensitizations to vespid venom is a frequent clinical problem in areas where different genera of wasps are present. Identification of the insect responsible for serious reactions poses a diagnostic challenge as the only effective treatment to date is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Berta Ruiz-Leon, Pilar Serrano, Carmen Vidal, Carmen Moreno-Aguilar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-02-01
Series:Toxins
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/14/2/126
_version_ 1797476287815614464
author Berta Ruiz-Leon
Pilar Serrano
Carmen Vidal
Carmen Moreno-Aguilar
author_facet Berta Ruiz-Leon
Pilar Serrano
Carmen Vidal
Carmen Moreno-Aguilar
author_sort Berta Ruiz-Leon
collection DOAJ
description Wasp allergy with a diagnostic profile of double sensitizations to vespid venom is a frequent clinical problem in areas where different genera of wasps are present. Identification of the insect responsible for serious reactions poses a diagnostic challenge as the only effective treatment to date is immunotherapy based on the specific venom. In southern Europe, the double sensitization to <i>Vespula</i> and <i>Polistes</i> venoms is highly frequent. It has been shown that the major allergenic proteins (Phospholipase A1 and Antigen 5) share sequences across the different genera and species, which would be the cause of cross-reactivity. Additionally, the minor allergens (Dipeptidyl-peptidases, Vitellogenins) have been found to share partial sequence identity. Furthermore, venom contains other homologous proteins whose allergenic nature still remains to be clarified. The traditional diagnostic tools available are insufficient to discriminate between allergy to <i>Vespula</i> and <i>Polistes</i> in a high number of cases. IgE inhibition is the technique that best identifies the cross-reactivity. When a double sensitization has indeed been shown to exist or great uncertainty surrounds the primary sensitization, therapy with two venoms is advisable to guarantee the safety of the patient. In this case, a strategy involving alternate administration that combines effectiveness with efficiency is possible.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T20:55:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d66b13de41534dbab4e64317e73ad583
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6651
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T20:55:53Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Toxins
spelling doaj.art-d66b13de41534dbab4e64317e73ad5832023-11-23T22:21:48ZengMDPI AGToxins2072-66512022-02-0114212610.3390/toxins14020126Management of Double Sensitization to Vespids in EuropeBerta Ruiz-Leon0Pilar Serrano1Carmen Vidal2Carmen Moreno-Aguilar3Allergy Section of University Hospital Reina Sofia-IMIBIC, ARADyAL Network, National Institute of Health Carlos III, 14005 Cordoba, SpainAllergy Section of University Hospital Reina Sofia-IMIBIC, ARADyAL Network, National Institute of Health Carlos III, 14005 Cordoba, SpainAllergy Department of Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, SpainAllergy Section of University Hospital Reina Sofia-IMIBIC, ARADyAL Network, National Institute of Health Carlos III, 14005 Cordoba, SpainWasp allergy with a diagnostic profile of double sensitizations to vespid venom is a frequent clinical problem in areas where different genera of wasps are present. Identification of the insect responsible for serious reactions poses a diagnostic challenge as the only effective treatment to date is immunotherapy based on the specific venom. In southern Europe, the double sensitization to <i>Vespula</i> and <i>Polistes</i> venoms is highly frequent. It has been shown that the major allergenic proteins (Phospholipase A1 and Antigen 5) share sequences across the different genera and species, which would be the cause of cross-reactivity. Additionally, the minor allergens (Dipeptidyl-peptidases, Vitellogenins) have been found to share partial sequence identity. Furthermore, venom contains other homologous proteins whose allergenic nature still remains to be clarified. The traditional diagnostic tools available are insufficient to discriminate between allergy to <i>Vespula</i> and <i>Polistes</i> in a high number of cases. IgE inhibition is the technique that best identifies the cross-reactivity. When a double sensitization has indeed been shown to exist or great uncertainty surrounds the primary sensitization, therapy with two venoms is advisable to guarantee the safety of the patient. In this case, a strategy involving alternate administration that combines effectiveness with efficiency is possible.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/14/2/126<i>Vespula</i><i>Polistes</i>allergensdouble sensitization to vespidscross-reactivityvenom immunotherapy
spellingShingle Berta Ruiz-Leon
Pilar Serrano
Carmen Vidal
Carmen Moreno-Aguilar
Management of Double Sensitization to Vespids in Europe
Toxins
<i>Vespula</i>
<i>Polistes</i>
allergens
double sensitization to vespids
cross-reactivity
venom immunotherapy
title Management of Double Sensitization to Vespids in Europe
title_full Management of Double Sensitization to Vespids in Europe
title_fullStr Management of Double Sensitization to Vespids in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Management of Double Sensitization to Vespids in Europe
title_short Management of Double Sensitization to Vespids in Europe
title_sort management of double sensitization to vespids in europe
topic <i>Vespula</i>
<i>Polistes</i>
allergens
double sensitization to vespids
cross-reactivity
venom immunotherapy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/14/2/126
work_keys_str_mv AT bertaruizleon managementofdoublesensitizationtovespidsineurope
AT pilarserrano managementofdoublesensitizationtovespidsineurope
AT carmenvidal managementofdoublesensitizationtovespidsineurope
AT carmenmorenoaguilar managementofdoublesensitizationtovespidsineurope