Rural areas are disproportionately impacted by smoking and lung cancer

Rural populations have higher rates of late stage lung cancer incidence and mortality compared to urban populations, making them important target populations for low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening. LDCT screening has been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality and is recommended by the Uni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wiley D. Jenkins, Alicia K. Matthews, Angie Bailey, Whitney E. Zahnd, Karriem S. Watson, Georgia Mueller-Luckey, Yamile Molina, David Crumly, Julie Patera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-06-01
Series:Preventive Medicine Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335518300494
_version_ 1818791321682313216
author Wiley D. Jenkins
Alicia K. Matthews
Angie Bailey
Whitney E. Zahnd
Karriem S. Watson
Georgia Mueller-Luckey
Yamile Molina
David Crumly
Julie Patera
author_facet Wiley D. Jenkins
Alicia K. Matthews
Angie Bailey
Whitney E. Zahnd
Karriem S. Watson
Georgia Mueller-Luckey
Yamile Molina
David Crumly
Julie Patera
author_sort Wiley D. Jenkins
collection DOAJ
description Rural populations have higher rates of late stage lung cancer incidence and mortality compared to urban populations, making them important target populations for low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening. LDCT screening has been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality and is recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force for individuals who meet certain risk criteria. However, rural populations may experience greater system, provider, and individual-level barriers to screening and related health-seeking behavior (e.g. smoking cessation). LDCT screening was first tested in urban, academic centers, so it is still unknown how readily it may be implemented in rural areas. Additionally, rural populations have limited access to both primary care physicians who may refer to LDCT screening and specialty physicians who may perform the screening. Further, rural populations may be less likely to seek screening due to lack of awareness and understanding or other unknown knowledge or psychosocial barriers. There are several strategies that may address these rural specific challenges. First, further research is needed to better understand the individual-level barriers that rural patients experience. Second, to reduce system-level barriers, additional efforts should be made to increase rural access to screening through improved referral processes. Third, creation of decision support materials to equip rural providers to engage their patients in a shared decision making process regarding screening may help reduce physician level barriers. Fourth, development of a holistic approach to smoking cessation may help reduce lung cancer risk in conjunction with LDCT screening. Keywords: Rural cancer disparities, Lung cancer, Screening, Low dose computed tomography
first_indexed 2024-12-18T15:09:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d674f10523ab4730ac8c790f3c196b19
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2211-3355
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T15:09:30Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Preventive Medicine Reports
spelling doaj.art-d674f10523ab4730ac8c790f3c196b192022-12-21T21:03:42ZengElsevierPreventive Medicine Reports2211-33552018-06-0110200203Rural areas are disproportionately impacted by smoking and lung cancerWiley D. Jenkins0Alicia K. Matthews1Angie Bailey2Whitney E. Zahnd3Karriem S. Watson4Georgia Mueller-Luckey5Yamile Molina6David Crumly7Julie Patera8Office of Population Science and Policy, SIU School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62794-9664, United StatesCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United StatesSouthern Illinois Healthcare, Carbondale, IL 62902, United StatesOffice of Population Science and Policy, SIU School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62794-9664, United StatesCommunity Engaged Research and Implementation Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United StatesApplied Health Department, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, IL, United StatesCommunity Engaged Research and Implementation Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United StatesOffice of Population Science and Policy, SIU School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62794-9664, United States; Corresponding author.Southern Illinois Healthcare, Carbondale, IL 62902, United StatesRural populations have higher rates of late stage lung cancer incidence and mortality compared to urban populations, making them important target populations for low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening. LDCT screening has been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality and is recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force for individuals who meet certain risk criteria. However, rural populations may experience greater system, provider, and individual-level barriers to screening and related health-seeking behavior (e.g. smoking cessation). LDCT screening was first tested in urban, academic centers, so it is still unknown how readily it may be implemented in rural areas. Additionally, rural populations have limited access to both primary care physicians who may refer to LDCT screening and specialty physicians who may perform the screening. Further, rural populations may be less likely to seek screening due to lack of awareness and understanding or other unknown knowledge or psychosocial barriers. There are several strategies that may address these rural specific challenges. First, further research is needed to better understand the individual-level barriers that rural patients experience. Second, to reduce system-level barriers, additional efforts should be made to increase rural access to screening through improved referral processes. Third, creation of decision support materials to equip rural providers to engage their patients in a shared decision making process regarding screening may help reduce physician level barriers. Fourth, development of a holistic approach to smoking cessation may help reduce lung cancer risk in conjunction with LDCT screening. Keywords: Rural cancer disparities, Lung cancer, Screening, Low dose computed tomographyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335518300494
spellingShingle Wiley D. Jenkins
Alicia K. Matthews
Angie Bailey
Whitney E. Zahnd
Karriem S. Watson
Georgia Mueller-Luckey
Yamile Molina
David Crumly
Julie Patera
Rural areas are disproportionately impacted by smoking and lung cancer
Preventive Medicine Reports
title Rural areas are disproportionately impacted by smoking and lung cancer
title_full Rural areas are disproportionately impacted by smoking and lung cancer
title_fullStr Rural areas are disproportionately impacted by smoking and lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Rural areas are disproportionately impacted by smoking and lung cancer
title_short Rural areas are disproportionately impacted by smoking and lung cancer
title_sort rural areas are disproportionately impacted by smoking and lung cancer
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335518300494
work_keys_str_mv AT wileydjenkins ruralareasaredisproportionatelyimpactedbysmokingandlungcancer
AT aliciakmatthews ruralareasaredisproportionatelyimpactedbysmokingandlungcancer
AT angiebailey ruralareasaredisproportionatelyimpactedbysmokingandlungcancer
AT whitneyezahnd ruralareasaredisproportionatelyimpactedbysmokingandlungcancer
AT karriemswatson ruralareasaredisproportionatelyimpactedbysmokingandlungcancer
AT georgiamuellerluckey ruralareasaredisproportionatelyimpactedbysmokingandlungcancer
AT yamilemolina ruralareasaredisproportionatelyimpactedbysmokingandlungcancer
AT davidcrumly ruralareasaredisproportionatelyimpactedbysmokingandlungcancer
AT juliepatera ruralareasaredisproportionatelyimpactedbysmokingandlungcancer