Association of motor index scores with fall incidence among community-dwelling older people

Abstract Background Several kinds of motor dysfunction have been studied for predicting future fall risk in community-dwelling older individuals. However, no study has tested the ability of the fine motor index (FINEA) and gross motor index (GROSSA) to predict the risk of falling, as well as the spe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao Liu, Ayiguli Abudukeremu, Yuan Jiang, Zhengyu Cao, Maoxiong Wu, Kai Zheng, Jianyong Ma, Runlu Sun, Zhiteng Chen, Yangxin Chen, Yuling Zhang, Jingfeng Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-12-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03680-6
_version_ 1797973535513116672
author Xiao Liu
Ayiguli Abudukeremu
Yuan Jiang
Zhengyu Cao
Maoxiong Wu
Kai Zheng
Jianyong Ma
Runlu Sun
Zhiteng Chen
Yangxin Chen
Yuling Zhang
Jingfeng Wang
author_facet Xiao Liu
Ayiguli Abudukeremu
Yuan Jiang
Zhengyu Cao
Maoxiong Wu
Kai Zheng
Jianyong Ma
Runlu Sun
Zhiteng Chen
Yangxin Chen
Yuling Zhang
Jingfeng Wang
author_sort Xiao Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Several kinds of motor dysfunction have been studied for predicting future fall risk in community-dwelling older individuals. However, no study has tested the ability of the fine motor index (FINEA) and gross motor index (GROSSA) to predict the risk of falling, as well as the specific fall type. Objective We investigated the associations of FINEA/GROSSA scores with fall risk, explained falls, and unexplained falls. Methods A total of 6267 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 50 years from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Aging (TILDA) cohort were included. First, the associations of FINEA and GROSSA scores with the history of total falls, explained falls and unexplained falls were assessed in a cross-sectional study and further verified in a prospective cohort after 2 years of follow-up by Poisson regression analysis. Results We found that high FINEA and GROSSA scores were positively associated with almost all fall histories (FINEA scores: total falls: adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.28, P = 0.009; explained falls: aPR = 1.15, P = 0.231; unexplained falls: aPR = 1.88, P < 0.001; GROSSA scores: total falls: aPR = 1.39, P < 0.001; explained falls: aPR = 1.28, P = 0.012; unexplained falls: aPR = 2.18, P < 0.001) in a cross-sectional study. After 2 years of follow-up, high FINEA scores were associated with an increased incidence of total falls (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] = 1.42, P = 0.016) and explained falls (aRR = 1.51, P = 0.020) but not with unexplained falls (aRR = 1.41, P = 0.209). High GROSSA scores were associated with an increased incidence of unexplained falls (aRR = 1.57, P = 0.041) and were not associated with either total falls (aRR = 1.21, P = 0.129) or explained falls (aRR = 1.07, P = 0.656). Compared with individuals without limitations in either the FINEA or GROSSA, individuals with limitations in both indices had a higher risk of falls, including total falls (aRR = 1.35, P = 0.002), explained falls (aRR = 1.31, P = 0.033) and unexplained falls (aRR = 1.62, P = 0.004). Conclusion FINEA scores were positively associated with accidental falls, while GROSSA scores were positively associated with unexplained falls. The group for whom both measures were impaired showed a significantly higher risk of both explained and unexplained falls. FINEA or GROSSA scores should be investigated further as possible tools to screen for and identify community-dwelling adults at high risk of falling.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:05:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6894ad75f4f4ebea5e0daa8ceec5b0c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2318
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:05:41Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Geriatrics
spelling doaj.art-d6894ad75f4f4ebea5e0daa8ceec5b0c2023-01-01T12:27:08ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182022-12-0122111210.1186/s12877-022-03680-6Association of motor index scores with fall incidence among community-dwelling older peopleXiao Liu0Ayiguli Abudukeremu1Yuan Jiang2Zhengyu Cao3Maoxiong Wu4Kai Zheng5Jianyong Ma6Runlu Sun7Zhiteng Chen8Yangxin Chen9Yuling Zhang10Jingfeng Wang11Department of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityMedical Care Strategic Customer Department, China Merchants Bank Shenzhen BranchDepartment of Pharmacology and Systems Physiology University of Cincinnati College of MedicineDepartment of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityAbstract Background Several kinds of motor dysfunction have been studied for predicting future fall risk in community-dwelling older individuals. However, no study has tested the ability of the fine motor index (FINEA) and gross motor index (GROSSA) to predict the risk of falling, as well as the specific fall type. Objective We investigated the associations of FINEA/GROSSA scores with fall risk, explained falls, and unexplained falls. Methods A total of 6267 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 50 years from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Aging (TILDA) cohort were included. First, the associations of FINEA and GROSSA scores with the history of total falls, explained falls and unexplained falls were assessed in a cross-sectional study and further verified in a prospective cohort after 2 years of follow-up by Poisson regression analysis. Results We found that high FINEA and GROSSA scores were positively associated with almost all fall histories (FINEA scores: total falls: adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.28, P = 0.009; explained falls: aPR = 1.15, P = 0.231; unexplained falls: aPR = 1.88, P < 0.001; GROSSA scores: total falls: aPR = 1.39, P < 0.001; explained falls: aPR = 1.28, P = 0.012; unexplained falls: aPR = 2.18, P < 0.001) in a cross-sectional study. After 2 years of follow-up, high FINEA scores were associated with an increased incidence of total falls (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] = 1.42, P = 0.016) and explained falls (aRR = 1.51, P = 0.020) but not with unexplained falls (aRR = 1.41, P = 0.209). High GROSSA scores were associated with an increased incidence of unexplained falls (aRR = 1.57, P = 0.041) and were not associated with either total falls (aRR = 1.21, P = 0.129) or explained falls (aRR = 1.07, P = 0.656). Compared with individuals without limitations in either the FINEA or GROSSA, individuals with limitations in both indices had a higher risk of falls, including total falls (aRR = 1.35, P = 0.002), explained falls (aRR = 1.31, P = 0.033) and unexplained falls (aRR = 1.62, P = 0.004). Conclusion FINEA scores were positively associated with accidental falls, while GROSSA scores were positively associated with unexplained falls. The group for whom both measures were impaired showed a significantly higher risk of both explained and unexplained falls. FINEA or GROSSA scores should be investigated further as possible tools to screen for and identify community-dwelling adults at high risk of falling.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03680-6Motor indexFallTILDA
spellingShingle Xiao Liu
Ayiguli Abudukeremu
Yuan Jiang
Zhengyu Cao
Maoxiong Wu
Kai Zheng
Jianyong Ma
Runlu Sun
Zhiteng Chen
Yangxin Chen
Yuling Zhang
Jingfeng Wang
Association of motor index scores with fall incidence among community-dwelling older people
BMC Geriatrics
Motor index
Fall
TILDA
title Association of motor index scores with fall incidence among community-dwelling older people
title_full Association of motor index scores with fall incidence among community-dwelling older people
title_fullStr Association of motor index scores with fall incidence among community-dwelling older people
title_full_unstemmed Association of motor index scores with fall incidence among community-dwelling older people
title_short Association of motor index scores with fall incidence among community-dwelling older people
title_sort association of motor index scores with fall incidence among community dwelling older people
topic Motor index
Fall
TILDA
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03680-6
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoliu associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT ayiguliabudukeremu associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT yuanjiang associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT zhengyucao associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT maoxiongwu associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT kaizheng associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT jianyongma associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT runlusun associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT zhitengchen associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT yangxinchen associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT yulingzhang associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT jingfengwang associationofmotorindexscoreswithfallincidenceamongcommunitydwellingolderpeople