Field trial of applicability of lot quality assurance sampling survey method for rapid assessment of prevalence of active trachoma

OBJECTIVE: To test the applicability of lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) for the rapid assessment of the prevalence of active trachoma. METHODS: Prevalence of active trachoma in six communities was found by examining all children aged 2-5 years. Trial surveys were conducted in these communities...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Myatt Mark, Limburg Hans, Minassian Darwin, Katyola Damson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The World Health Organization 2003-01-01
Series:Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862003001200006
_version_ 1797282177071710208
author Myatt Mark
Limburg Hans
Minassian Darwin
Katyola Damson
author_facet Myatt Mark
Limburg Hans
Minassian Darwin
Katyola Damson
author_sort Myatt Mark
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: To test the applicability of lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) for the rapid assessment of the prevalence of active trachoma. METHODS: Prevalence of active trachoma in six communities was found by examining all children aged 2-5 years. Trial surveys were conducted in these communities. A sampling plan appropriate for classifying communities with prevalences <20% and >40% was applied to the survey data. Operating characteristic and average sample number curves were plotted, and screening test indices were calculated. The ability of LQAS to provide a three-class classification system was investigated. FINDINGS: Ninety-six trial surveys were conducted. All communities with prevalences <20% and >40% were identified correctly. The method discriminated between communities with prevalences <30% and >30%, with sensitivity of 98% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 88.2-99.9%), specificity of 84.4% (CI = 69.9-93.0%), positive predictive value of 87.7% (CI = 75.7-94.5%), negative predictive value of 97.4% (CI = 84.9-99.9%), and accuracy of 91.7% (CI = 83.8-96.1%). Agreement between the three prevalence classes and survey classifications was 84.4% (CI = 75.2-90.7%). The time needed to complete the surveys was consistent with the need to complete a survey in one day. CONCLUSION: Lot quality assurance sampling provides a method of classifying communities according to the prevalence of active trachoma. It merits serious consideration as a replacement for the assessment of the prevalence of active trachoma with the currently used trachoma rapid assessment method. It may be extended to provide a multi-class classification method.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T17:09:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6a054306e134c689f5d179b6afd5146
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0042-9686
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T17:09:14Z
publishDate 2003-01-01
publisher The World Health Organization
record_format Article
series Bulletin of the World Health Organization
spelling doaj.art-d6a054306e134c689f5d179b6afd51462024-03-03T02:18:53ZengThe World Health OrganizationBulletin of the World Health Organization0042-96862003-01-018112877885Field trial of applicability of lot quality assurance sampling survey method for rapid assessment of prevalence of active trachomaMyatt MarkLimburg HansMinassian DarwinKatyola DamsonOBJECTIVE: To test the applicability of lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) for the rapid assessment of the prevalence of active trachoma. METHODS: Prevalence of active trachoma in six communities was found by examining all children aged 2-5 years. Trial surveys were conducted in these communities. A sampling plan appropriate for classifying communities with prevalences <20% and >40% was applied to the survey data. Operating characteristic and average sample number curves were plotted, and screening test indices were calculated. The ability of LQAS to provide a three-class classification system was investigated. FINDINGS: Ninety-six trial surveys were conducted. All communities with prevalences <20% and >40% were identified correctly. The method discriminated between communities with prevalences <30% and >30%, with sensitivity of 98% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 88.2-99.9%), specificity of 84.4% (CI = 69.9-93.0%), positive predictive value of 87.7% (CI = 75.7-94.5%), negative predictive value of 97.4% (CI = 84.9-99.9%), and accuracy of 91.7% (CI = 83.8-96.1%). Agreement between the three prevalence classes and survey classifications was 84.4% (CI = 75.2-90.7%). The time needed to complete the surveys was consistent with the need to complete a survey in one day. CONCLUSION: Lot quality assurance sampling provides a method of classifying communities according to the prevalence of active trachoma. It merits serious consideration as a replacement for the assessment of the prevalence of active trachoma with the currently used trachoma rapid assessment method. It may be extended to provide a multi-class classification method.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862003001200006Trachoma/epidemiologyPrevalenceQuality assuranceHealth careSampling studiesValidation studiesHealth surveysCnfidence intervalsSensitivity and specificityPredictive value of testsMalawi
spellingShingle Myatt Mark
Limburg Hans
Minassian Darwin
Katyola Damson
Field trial of applicability of lot quality assurance sampling survey method for rapid assessment of prevalence of active trachoma
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Trachoma/epidemiology
Prevalence
Quality assurance
Health care
Sampling studies
Validation studies
Health surveys
Cnfidence intervals
Sensitivity and specificity
Predictive value of tests
Malawi
title Field trial of applicability of lot quality assurance sampling survey method for rapid assessment of prevalence of active trachoma
title_full Field trial of applicability of lot quality assurance sampling survey method for rapid assessment of prevalence of active trachoma
title_fullStr Field trial of applicability of lot quality assurance sampling survey method for rapid assessment of prevalence of active trachoma
title_full_unstemmed Field trial of applicability of lot quality assurance sampling survey method for rapid assessment of prevalence of active trachoma
title_short Field trial of applicability of lot quality assurance sampling survey method for rapid assessment of prevalence of active trachoma
title_sort field trial of applicability of lot quality assurance sampling survey method for rapid assessment of prevalence of active trachoma
topic Trachoma/epidemiology
Prevalence
Quality assurance
Health care
Sampling studies
Validation studies
Health surveys
Cnfidence intervals
Sensitivity and specificity
Predictive value of tests
Malawi
url http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862003001200006
work_keys_str_mv AT myattmark fieldtrialofapplicabilityoflotqualityassurancesamplingsurveymethodforrapidassessmentofprevalenceofactivetrachoma
AT limburghans fieldtrialofapplicabilityoflotqualityassurancesamplingsurveymethodforrapidassessmentofprevalenceofactivetrachoma
AT minassiandarwin fieldtrialofapplicabilityoflotqualityassurancesamplingsurveymethodforrapidassessmentofprevalenceofactivetrachoma
AT katyoladamson fieldtrialofapplicabilityoflotqualityassurancesamplingsurveymethodforrapidassessmentofprevalenceofactivetrachoma