Two salamander species respond differently to timber harvests in a managed New England forest

Background Managing forests for timber while protecting wildlife habitat is of increasing concern. Amphibians may be particularly sensitive to forest management practices due to their unique biology; however, it is not clear how different species respond to timber harvest practices—particularly over...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angus Mossman, Max R. Lambert, Mark S. Ashton, Jessica Wikle, Marlyse C. Duguid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2019-08-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/7604.pdf
_version_ 1797420721768497152
author Angus Mossman
Max R. Lambert
Mark S. Ashton
Jessica Wikle
Marlyse C. Duguid
author_facet Angus Mossman
Max R. Lambert
Mark S. Ashton
Jessica Wikle
Marlyse C. Duguid
author_sort Angus Mossman
collection DOAJ
description Background Managing forests for timber while protecting wildlife habitat is of increasing concern. Amphibians may be particularly sensitive to forest management practices due to their unique biology; however, it is not clear how different species respond to timber harvest practices—particularly over longer time scales. Methods Here we report on the differential responses of two salamander species—the eastern red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus Green) and the eastern newt (Notophthalmus viridescens Rafinesque)—to forest harvesting, by examining communities across a 25-year chronosequence of regenerating shelterwood harvests. Results Populations of both species were lowest immediately after harvest, but increased at substantially different rates. Red-backed salamander populations were highest in 20–25 year-old shelterwoods—significantly higher than in mature, unharvested, control (100–120 year old) stands. Eastern newt populations, however, were greatest in unharvested control stands and still had not recovered to population levels found in mature stands in the 25 years since harvest. Red-backed salamander abundances were strongly tied to stand age as well as abundance of decayed coarse woody debris, suggesting that timber harvests influence some wildlife species by affecting a suite of interacting habitat variables that change over time. In contrast, newt abundances were not directly related to stand age but were more related to downed wood and vegetation characteristics. Our results highlight markedly variable responses by two common salamander species to forest harvesting—species with markedly different life histories and reproductive patterns—and that time since harvest may be useful in predicting abundance.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T07:06:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6a39207d72b4a04a55d8f2dfe9e77dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T07:06:42Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-d6a39207d72b4a04a55d8f2dfe9e77dd2023-12-03T09:31:10ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592019-08-017e760410.7717/peerj.7604Two salamander species respond differently to timber harvests in a managed New England forestAngus Mossman0Max R. Lambert1Mark S. Ashton2Jessica Wikle3Marlyse C. Duguid4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of AmericaDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of AmericaSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of AmericaSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of AmericaSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of AmericaBackground Managing forests for timber while protecting wildlife habitat is of increasing concern. Amphibians may be particularly sensitive to forest management practices due to their unique biology; however, it is not clear how different species respond to timber harvest practices—particularly over longer time scales. Methods Here we report on the differential responses of two salamander species—the eastern red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus Green) and the eastern newt (Notophthalmus viridescens Rafinesque)—to forest harvesting, by examining communities across a 25-year chronosequence of regenerating shelterwood harvests. Results Populations of both species were lowest immediately after harvest, but increased at substantially different rates. Red-backed salamander populations were highest in 20–25 year-old shelterwoods—significantly higher than in mature, unharvested, control (100–120 year old) stands. Eastern newt populations, however, were greatest in unharvested control stands and still had not recovered to population levels found in mature stands in the 25 years since harvest. Red-backed salamander abundances were strongly tied to stand age as well as abundance of decayed coarse woody debris, suggesting that timber harvests influence some wildlife species by affecting a suite of interacting habitat variables that change over time. In contrast, newt abundances were not directly related to stand age but were more related to downed wood and vegetation characteristics. Our results highlight markedly variable responses by two common salamander species to forest harvesting—species with markedly different life histories and reproductive patterns—and that time since harvest may be useful in predicting abundance.https://peerj.com/articles/7604.pdfAmphibianChronosequenceWildlife habitatCoarse woody debrisLoggingSecond growth forest
spellingShingle Angus Mossman
Max R. Lambert
Mark S. Ashton
Jessica Wikle
Marlyse C. Duguid
Two salamander species respond differently to timber harvests in a managed New England forest
PeerJ
Amphibian
Chronosequence
Wildlife habitat
Coarse woody debris
Logging
Second growth forest
title Two salamander species respond differently to timber harvests in a managed New England forest
title_full Two salamander species respond differently to timber harvests in a managed New England forest
title_fullStr Two salamander species respond differently to timber harvests in a managed New England forest
title_full_unstemmed Two salamander species respond differently to timber harvests in a managed New England forest
title_short Two salamander species respond differently to timber harvests in a managed New England forest
title_sort two salamander species respond differently to timber harvests in a managed new england forest
topic Amphibian
Chronosequence
Wildlife habitat
Coarse woody debris
Logging
Second growth forest
url https://peerj.com/articles/7604.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT angusmossman twosalamanderspeciesresponddifferentlytotimberharvestsinamanagednewenglandforest
AT maxrlambert twosalamanderspeciesresponddifferentlytotimberharvestsinamanagednewenglandforest
AT marksashton twosalamanderspeciesresponddifferentlytotimberharvestsinamanagednewenglandforest
AT jessicawikle twosalamanderspeciesresponddifferentlytotimberharvestsinamanagednewenglandforest
AT marlysecduguid twosalamanderspeciesresponddifferentlytotimberharvestsinamanagednewenglandforest