Error Budget in the Validation of Radiometric Products Derived from OLCI around the China Sea from Open Ocean to Coastal Waters Compared with MODIS and VIIRS

The accuracy of remote-sensing reflectance (<inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun Li, Cédric Jamet, Jianhua Zhu, Bing Han, Tongji Li, Anan Yang, Kai Guo, Di Jia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-10-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/20/2400
_version_ 1798018494120329216
author Jun Li
Cédric Jamet
Jianhua Zhu
Bing Han
Tongji Li
Anan Yang
Kai Guo
Di Jia
author_facet Jun Li
Cédric Jamet
Jianhua Zhu
Bing Han
Tongji Li
Anan Yang
Kai Guo
Di Jia
author_sort Jun Li
collection DOAJ
description The accuracy of remote-sensing reflectance (<inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>) estimated from ocean color imagery through the atmospheric correction step is essential in conducting quantitative estimates of the inherent optical properties and biogeochemical parameters of seawater. Therefore, finding the main source of error is the first step toward improving the accuracy of <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>. However, the classic validation exercises provide only the total error of the retrieved <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>. They do not reveal the error sources. Moreover, how to effectively improve this satellite algorithm remains unknown. To better understand and improve various aspects of the satellite atmospheric correction algorithm, the error budget in the validation is required. Here, to find the primary error source from the OLCI <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>, we evaluated the OLCI <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> product with in-situ data around the China Sea from open ocean to coastal waters and compared them with the MODIS-AQUA and VIIRS products. The results show that the performances of OLCI are comparable to those MODIS-AQUA. The average percentage difference (APD) in <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> is lowest at 490 nm (18%), and highest at 754 nm (79%). A more detailed analysis reveals that open ocean and coastal waters show opposite results: compared to coastal waters the satellite <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> in open seas are higher than the in-situ measured values. An error budget for the three satellite-derived <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> products is presented, showing that the primary error source in the China Sea was the aerosol estimation and the error on the Rayleigh-corrected radiance for OLCI, as well as for MODIS and VIIRS. This work suggests that to improve the accuracy of Sentinel-3A in the coastal waters of China, the accuracy of aerosol estimation in atmospheric correction must be improved.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T16:24:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6adce1f4add46769ccc63598bac17b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T16:24:54Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-d6adce1f4add46769ccc63598bac17b92022-12-22T04:14:13ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-10-011120240010.3390/rs11202400rs11202400Error Budget in the Validation of Radiometric Products Derived from OLCI around the China Sea from Open Ocean to Coastal Waters Compared with MODIS and VIIRSJun Li0Cédric Jamet1Jianhua Zhu2Bing Han3Tongji Li4Anan Yang5Kai Guo6Di Jia7National Ocean Technology Center, State Oceanic Administration, Tianjin 300112, ChinaUniv. Littoral Cote d’Opale, Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8187, LOG, Laboratoire d’Océanologie et de Géosciences, 62930 Wimereux, FranceNational Ocean Technology Center, State Oceanic Administration, Tianjin 300112, ChinaNational Ocean Technology Center, State Oceanic Administration, Tianjin 300112, ChinaNational Ocean Technology Center, State Oceanic Administration, Tianjin 300112, ChinaNational Ocean Technology Center, State Oceanic Administration, Tianjin 300112, ChinaNational Ocean Technology Center, State Oceanic Administration, Tianjin 300112, ChinaNational Ocean Technology Center, State Oceanic Administration, Tianjin 300112, ChinaThe accuracy of remote-sensing reflectance (<inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>) estimated from ocean color imagery through the atmospheric correction step is essential in conducting quantitative estimates of the inherent optical properties and biogeochemical parameters of seawater. Therefore, finding the main source of error is the first step toward improving the accuracy of <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>. However, the classic validation exercises provide only the total error of the retrieved <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>. They do not reveal the error sources. Moreover, how to effectively improve this satellite algorithm remains unknown. To better understand and improve various aspects of the satellite atmospheric correction algorithm, the error budget in the validation is required. Here, to find the primary error source from the OLCI <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>, we evaluated the OLCI <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> product with in-situ data around the China Sea from open ocean to coastal waters and compared them with the MODIS-AQUA and VIIRS products. The results show that the performances of OLCI are comparable to those MODIS-AQUA. The average percentage difference (APD) in <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> is lowest at 490 nm (18%), and highest at 754 nm (79%). A more detailed analysis reveals that open ocean and coastal waters show opposite results: compared to coastal waters the satellite <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> in open seas are higher than the in-situ measured values. An error budget for the three satellite-derived <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> products is presented, showing that the primary error source in the China Sea was the aerosol estimation and the error on the Rayleigh-corrected radiance for OLCI, as well as for MODIS and VIIRS. This work suggests that to improve the accuracy of Sentinel-3A in the coastal waters of China, the accuracy of aerosol estimation in atmospheric correction must be improved.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/20/2400olcimodisviirsremote-sensing reflectance (<i>r<sub>rs</sub></i>)error budgetchina sea
spellingShingle Jun Li
Cédric Jamet
Jianhua Zhu
Bing Han
Tongji Li
Anan Yang
Kai Guo
Di Jia
Error Budget in the Validation of Radiometric Products Derived from OLCI around the China Sea from Open Ocean to Coastal Waters Compared with MODIS and VIIRS
Remote Sensing
olci
modis
viirs
remote-sensing reflectance (<i>r<sub>rs</sub></i>)
error budget
china sea
title Error Budget in the Validation of Radiometric Products Derived from OLCI around the China Sea from Open Ocean to Coastal Waters Compared with MODIS and VIIRS
title_full Error Budget in the Validation of Radiometric Products Derived from OLCI around the China Sea from Open Ocean to Coastal Waters Compared with MODIS and VIIRS
title_fullStr Error Budget in the Validation of Radiometric Products Derived from OLCI around the China Sea from Open Ocean to Coastal Waters Compared with MODIS and VIIRS
title_full_unstemmed Error Budget in the Validation of Radiometric Products Derived from OLCI around the China Sea from Open Ocean to Coastal Waters Compared with MODIS and VIIRS
title_short Error Budget in the Validation of Radiometric Products Derived from OLCI around the China Sea from Open Ocean to Coastal Waters Compared with MODIS and VIIRS
title_sort error budget in the validation of radiometric products derived from olci around the china sea from open ocean to coastal waters compared with modis and viirs
topic olci
modis
viirs
remote-sensing reflectance (<i>r<sub>rs</sub></i>)
error budget
china sea
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/20/2400
work_keys_str_mv AT junli errorbudgetinthevalidationofradiometricproductsderivedfromolciaroundthechinaseafromopenoceantocoastalwaterscomparedwithmodisandviirs
AT cedricjamet errorbudgetinthevalidationofradiometricproductsderivedfromolciaroundthechinaseafromopenoceantocoastalwaterscomparedwithmodisandviirs
AT jianhuazhu errorbudgetinthevalidationofradiometricproductsderivedfromolciaroundthechinaseafromopenoceantocoastalwaterscomparedwithmodisandviirs
AT binghan errorbudgetinthevalidationofradiometricproductsderivedfromolciaroundthechinaseafromopenoceantocoastalwaterscomparedwithmodisandviirs
AT tongjili errorbudgetinthevalidationofradiometricproductsderivedfromolciaroundthechinaseafromopenoceantocoastalwaterscomparedwithmodisandviirs
AT ananyang errorbudgetinthevalidationofradiometricproductsderivedfromolciaroundthechinaseafromopenoceantocoastalwaterscomparedwithmodisandviirs
AT kaiguo errorbudgetinthevalidationofradiometricproductsderivedfromolciaroundthechinaseafromopenoceantocoastalwaterscomparedwithmodisandviirs
AT dijia errorbudgetinthevalidationofradiometricproductsderivedfromolciaroundthechinaseafromopenoceantocoastalwaterscomparedwithmodisandviirs