Optimizing passive acoustic sampling of bats in forests

Abstract Passive acoustic methods are increasingly used in biodiversity research and monitoring programs because they are cost‐effective and permit the collection of large datasets. However, the accuracy of the results depends on the bioacoustic characteristics of the focal taxa and their habitat us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jérémy S. P. Froidevaux, Florian Zellweger, Kurt Bollmann, Martin K. Obrist
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-12-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1296
_version_ 1828718004765982720
author Jérémy S. P. Froidevaux
Florian Zellweger
Kurt Bollmann
Martin K. Obrist
author_facet Jérémy S. P. Froidevaux
Florian Zellweger
Kurt Bollmann
Martin K. Obrist
author_sort Jérémy S. P. Froidevaux
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Passive acoustic methods are increasingly used in biodiversity research and monitoring programs because they are cost‐effective and permit the collection of large datasets. However, the accuracy of the results depends on the bioacoustic characteristics of the focal taxa and their habitat use. In particular, this applies to bats which exhibit distinct activity patterns in three‐dimensionally structured habitats such as forests. We assessed the performance of 21 acoustic sampling schemes with three temporal sampling patterns and seven sampling designs. Acoustic sampling was performed in 32 forest plots, each containing three microhabitats: forest ground, canopy, and forest gap. We compared bat activity, species richness, and sampling effort using species accumulation curves fitted with the clench equation. In addition, we estimated the sampling costs to undertake the best sampling schemes. We recorded a total of 145,433 echolocation call sequences of 16 bat species. Our results indicated that to generate the best outcome, it was necessary to sample all three microhabitats of a given forest location simultaneously throughout the entire night. Sampling only the forest gaps and the forest ground simultaneously was the second best choice and proved to be a viable alternative when the number of available detectors is limited. When assessing bat species richness at the 1‐km2 scale, the implementation of these sampling schemes at three to four forest locations yielded highest labor cost‐benefit ratios but increasing equipment costs. Our study illustrates that multiple passive acoustic sampling schemes require testing based on the target taxa and habitat complexity and should be performed with reference to cost‐benefit ratios. Choosing a standardized and replicated sampling scheme is particularly important to optimize the level of precision in inventories, especially when rare or elusive species are expected.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T14:36:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6b1c9e7d52247f7b54d9733a15e3ea7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T14:36:37Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-d6b1c9e7d52247f7b54d9733a15e3ea72023-08-17T06:29:15ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582014-12-014244690470010.1002/ece3.1296Optimizing passive acoustic sampling of bats in forestsJérémy S. P. Froidevaux0Florian Zellweger1Kurt Bollmann2Martin K. Obrist3WSL Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Zürcherstrasse 111 CH‐8903 Birmensdorf SwitzerlandWSL Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Zürcherstrasse 111 CH‐8903 Birmensdorf SwitzerlandWSL Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Zürcherstrasse 111 CH‐8903 Birmensdorf SwitzerlandWSL Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Zürcherstrasse 111 CH‐8903 Birmensdorf SwitzerlandAbstract Passive acoustic methods are increasingly used in biodiversity research and monitoring programs because they are cost‐effective and permit the collection of large datasets. However, the accuracy of the results depends on the bioacoustic characteristics of the focal taxa and their habitat use. In particular, this applies to bats which exhibit distinct activity patterns in three‐dimensionally structured habitats such as forests. We assessed the performance of 21 acoustic sampling schemes with three temporal sampling patterns and seven sampling designs. Acoustic sampling was performed in 32 forest plots, each containing three microhabitats: forest ground, canopy, and forest gap. We compared bat activity, species richness, and sampling effort using species accumulation curves fitted with the clench equation. In addition, we estimated the sampling costs to undertake the best sampling schemes. We recorded a total of 145,433 echolocation call sequences of 16 bat species. Our results indicated that to generate the best outcome, it was necessary to sample all three microhabitats of a given forest location simultaneously throughout the entire night. Sampling only the forest gaps and the forest ground simultaneously was the second best choice and proved to be a viable alternative when the number of available detectors is limited. When assessing bat species richness at the 1‐km2 scale, the implementation of these sampling schemes at three to four forest locations yielded highest labor cost‐benefit ratios but increasing equipment costs. Our study illustrates that multiple passive acoustic sampling schemes require testing based on the target taxa and habitat complexity and should be performed with reference to cost‐benefit ratios. Choosing a standardized and replicated sampling scheme is particularly important to optimize the level of precision in inventories, especially when rare or elusive species are expected.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1296Activitycost‐effectivenessecholocationforest microhabitatsinventoryspecies richness
spellingShingle Jérémy S. P. Froidevaux
Florian Zellweger
Kurt Bollmann
Martin K. Obrist
Optimizing passive acoustic sampling of bats in forests
Ecology and Evolution
Activity
cost‐effectiveness
echolocation
forest microhabitats
inventory
species richness
title Optimizing passive acoustic sampling of bats in forests
title_full Optimizing passive acoustic sampling of bats in forests
title_fullStr Optimizing passive acoustic sampling of bats in forests
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing passive acoustic sampling of bats in forests
title_short Optimizing passive acoustic sampling of bats in forests
title_sort optimizing passive acoustic sampling of bats in forests
topic Activity
cost‐effectiveness
echolocation
forest microhabitats
inventory
species richness
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1296
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremyspfroidevaux optimizingpassiveacousticsamplingofbatsinforests
AT florianzellweger optimizingpassiveacousticsamplingofbatsinforests
AT kurtbollmann optimizingpassiveacousticsamplingofbatsinforests
AT martinkobrist optimizingpassiveacousticsamplingofbatsinforests