A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China
Abstract Background By comparing the differences in plant use between various cultures or regions, we can gain a better understanding of traditional knowledge of plant use among different groups, which may lead to a more objective understanding. Even though the Tibetan and Daman people live in the s...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00583-7 |
| _version_ | 1797831985667768320 |
|---|---|
| author | Chang-An Guo Xiaoyong Ding Huabin Hu Yu Zhang Ciren Bianba Ba Bian Yuhua Wang |
| author_facet | Chang-An Guo Xiaoyong Ding Huabin Hu Yu Zhang Ciren Bianba Ba Bian Yuhua Wang |
| author_sort | Chang-An Guo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background By comparing the differences in plant use between various cultures or regions, we can gain a better understanding of traditional knowledge of plant use among different groups, which may lead to a more objective understanding. Even though the Tibetan and Daman people live in the same ecosystem in Gyirong town, China, their cultural backgrounds and livelihoods differ. Therefore, the objective of this study is to document the traditional knowledge of plant use among the Daman people and compare it with the local Tibetan knowledge of plant use. By doing so, we aim to explore the relationship between plant selection and use and the cultural backgrounds of different groups. Methods During fieldwork, ethnobotanical data were collected using various methods including free listings, key informant interviews, and semi-structured interviews. To quantify the importance of plant species in the Daman people’s culture, the culture importance index, informant consensus factor index, and The Index of Agreement on Species consensus (IASc) were used. In addition, we cited previous ethnobotanical survey data from the Tibetan in Gyirong. To more comprehensively compare the differences in plant use between the Daman and Tibetan, this study constructed a knowledge network to compare the knowledge differences between the two groups. Results In this study, traditional knowledge was collected from 32 Daman informants, resulting in a total of 68 species belonging to 39 families mentioned by Daman people and 111 species mentioned by Tibetans. Of these, 58 plants were used by both populations. The plants were classified into 3 categories and 28 subcategories, with 22 identical classes in both groups. The majority of use categories showed a high degree of sharing in both groups, and the Tibetan people had more plant use categories than the Daman people. Five plants with IASc value > 0.5 were identified in both groups: Rhododendron anthopogon D. Don, Artemisia japonica Thunb., Juniperus indica Bertol., Gastrodia elata Blume, and Rheum australe D. Don. The analysis of the knowledge network revealed a 66% overlap between the knowledge of the Daman and the knowledge of the Tibetans. Additionally, the plant knowledge of Tibetan people was found to be richer and more complex than that of the Daman people. However, the Daman people possess 30 unique knowledge items. Conclusions From the perspective of plant use, the history of the Daman people's discrete migration on the border between China and Nepal allows them to retain their own knowledge of plant use. The status quo of joining Chinese nationality and settling in Gyirong town allows them to gradually integrate into the local Tibetan society. In summary, despite living in the same ecosystem and biodiversity background, the plant utilization of the Daman people and Tibetans still shows significant differences, which are due to their different cultural backgrounds and social status. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T14:00:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d6be07913dbb4db8847627d132cbc50f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1746-4269 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T14:00:29Z |
| publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-d6be07913dbb4db8847627d132cbc50f2023-05-07T11:21:03ZengBMCJournal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine1746-42692023-05-0119111710.1186/s13002-023-00583-7A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, ChinaChang-An Guo0Xiaoyong Ding1Huabin Hu2Yu Zhang3Ciren BianbaBa BianYuhua Wang4Department of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of SciencesDepartment of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of SciencesCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Plant Resources and Sustainable Use, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of SciencesDepartment of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of SciencesDepartment of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of SciencesAbstract Background By comparing the differences in plant use between various cultures or regions, we can gain a better understanding of traditional knowledge of plant use among different groups, which may lead to a more objective understanding. Even though the Tibetan and Daman people live in the same ecosystem in Gyirong town, China, their cultural backgrounds and livelihoods differ. Therefore, the objective of this study is to document the traditional knowledge of plant use among the Daman people and compare it with the local Tibetan knowledge of plant use. By doing so, we aim to explore the relationship between plant selection and use and the cultural backgrounds of different groups. Methods During fieldwork, ethnobotanical data were collected using various methods including free listings, key informant interviews, and semi-structured interviews. To quantify the importance of plant species in the Daman people’s culture, the culture importance index, informant consensus factor index, and The Index of Agreement on Species consensus (IASc) were used. In addition, we cited previous ethnobotanical survey data from the Tibetan in Gyirong. To more comprehensively compare the differences in plant use between the Daman and Tibetan, this study constructed a knowledge network to compare the knowledge differences between the two groups. Results In this study, traditional knowledge was collected from 32 Daman informants, resulting in a total of 68 species belonging to 39 families mentioned by Daman people and 111 species mentioned by Tibetans. Of these, 58 plants were used by both populations. The plants were classified into 3 categories and 28 subcategories, with 22 identical classes in both groups. The majority of use categories showed a high degree of sharing in both groups, and the Tibetan people had more plant use categories than the Daman people. Five plants with IASc value > 0.5 were identified in both groups: Rhododendron anthopogon D. Don, Artemisia japonica Thunb., Juniperus indica Bertol., Gastrodia elata Blume, and Rheum australe D. Don. The analysis of the knowledge network revealed a 66% overlap between the knowledge of the Daman and the knowledge of the Tibetans. Additionally, the plant knowledge of Tibetan people was found to be richer and more complex than that of the Daman people. However, the Daman people possess 30 unique knowledge items. Conclusions From the perspective of plant use, the history of the Daman people's discrete migration on the border between China and Nepal allows them to retain their own knowledge of plant use. The status quo of joining Chinese nationality and settling in Gyirong town allows them to gradually integrate into the local Tibetan society. In summary, despite living in the same ecosystem and biodiversity background, the plant utilization of the Daman people and Tibetans still shows significant differences, which are due to their different cultural backgrounds and social status.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00583-7HimalayasEthnobotanyBiodiversity hotspotsDaman peopleTraditional knowledge |
| spellingShingle | Chang-An Guo Xiaoyong Ding Huabin Hu Yu Zhang Ciren Bianba Ba Bian Yuhua Wang A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine Himalayas Ethnobotany Biodiversity hotspots Daman people Traditional knowledge |
| title | A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China |
| title_full | A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China |
| title_fullStr | A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China |
| title_short | A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China |
| title_sort | comparison of traditional plant knowledge between daman people and tibetans in gyirong river valley tibet china |
| topic | Himalayas Ethnobotany Biodiversity hotspots Daman people Traditional knowledge |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00583-7 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT changanguo acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT xiaoyongding acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT huabinhu acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT yuzhang acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT cirenbianba acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT babian acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT yuhuawang acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT changanguo comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT xiaoyongding comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT huabinhu comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT yuzhang comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT cirenbianba comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT babian comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina AT yuhuawang comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina |