Indirect comparison of interventions using published randomised trials: systematic review of PDE-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There are no randomised and properly blinded trials directly comparing one PDE-5 inhibitor with another in a normal home setting. Valid indirect comparisons with a common comparator must examine equivalent doses, similar duration, si...
Main Authors: | McQuay Henry J, Derry Sheena, Moore R Andrew |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2005-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Urology |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2490/5/18 |
Similar Items
-
Indirect comparison of interventions using published randomised trials: systematic review of PDE-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction
by: Moore, R, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Faecal blood loss: Systematic review and analysis of randomised trials with aspirin and NSAIDs
by: Moore, A, et al.
Published: (2007) -
Systematic review of systematic reviews of acupuncture published 1996-2005 - In response to Lewith et al
by: Moore, A, et al.
Published: (2006) -
Relationship between Response to PDE5 Inhibitors and Penile Duplex Doppler Ultrasound in Erectile Dysfunction
by: Ercan Ogreden, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Faecal blood loss with aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors: systematic review of randomized trials using autologous chromium-labelled erythrocytes.
by: Moore, R, et al.
Published: (2008)