Arrhenius constitutive model and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel

In order to analyze the thermal deformation and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel, the isothermal compression tests are carried out on Gleeble-3500 thermal simulator machine at deformation temperatures 973.15 K–1273.15 K with strain rates 0.001 s−1–1 s−1. Based on the true stre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Runze Cao, Wei Wang, Shibo Ma, Huajun Yan, Zhenkai Mu, Shuangjie Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-05-01
Series:Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785423008876
_version_ 1797798766891237376
author Runze Cao
Wei Wang
Shibo Ma
Huajun Yan
Zhenkai Mu
Shuangjie Zhang
author_facet Runze Cao
Wei Wang
Shibo Ma
Huajun Yan
Zhenkai Mu
Shuangjie Zhang
author_sort Runze Cao
collection DOAJ
description In order to analyze the thermal deformation and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel, the isothermal compression tests are carried out on Gleeble-3500 thermal simulator machine at deformation temperatures 973.15 K–1273.15 K with strain rates 0.001 s−1–1 s−1. Based on the true stress σ0.3, the Arrhenius constitutive models are constructed by using characterization parameters and physical base parameters, and the determination coefficients between the predicted values of the two models and the measured values are 0.98378 and 0.97613, respectively. The constitutive models of characterization parameters and physical base parameters considering strain effect are also constructed, and a comparative analysis is made. The results show that the predicted values of the characterization parameters constitutive model is closer to the measured values in the low strain region. After reaching the peak strain, the predicted values of the two constitutive models are close to the measured values, and both have high prediction accuracy. The dynamic recrystallization models are established to characterize the recrystallization behavior. The recrystallization activation energy of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel is 169.6793 kJ mol−1, the ratio of critical strain to peak strain is about 0.47074, and the ratio of critical stress to peak stress is about 0.94059. The activation energy of 50% dynamic recrystallization is 29.9844 kJ mol−1. The dynamic recrystallized grain size increases with increasing deformation temperature or decreasing strain rate, and the activation energy of grain growth is −49.9237 kJ mol−1.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:09:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6c354ebe7a14d9e9017bf5a360d506a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2238-7854
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:09:48Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Materials Research and Technology
spelling doaj.art-d6c354ebe7a14d9e9017bf5a360d506a2023-06-21T06:57:06ZengElsevierJournal of Materials Research and Technology2238-78542023-05-012463346347Arrhenius constitutive model and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18CrNiMo7-6 steelRunze Cao0Wei Wang1Shibo Ma2Huajun Yan3Zhenkai Mu4Shuangjie Zhang5School of Material Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, Hebei Province, ChinaSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, Hebei Province, China; Hebei Key Laboratory of Material Near-Net Forming Technology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050018, China; Corresponding author.Hebei Key Laboratory of Material Near-Net Forming Technology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050018, ChinaSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, Hebei Province, China; Hebei Key Laboratory of Material Near-Net Forming Technology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050018, ChinaSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, Hebei Province, China; Hebei Key Laboratory of Material Near-Net Forming Technology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050018, ChinaSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, Hebei Province, China; Hebei Key Laboratory of Material Near-Net Forming Technology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050018, ChinaIn order to analyze the thermal deformation and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel, the isothermal compression tests are carried out on Gleeble-3500 thermal simulator machine at deformation temperatures 973.15 K–1273.15 K with strain rates 0.001 s−1–1 s−1. Based on the true stress σ0.3, the Arrhenius constitutive models are constructed by using characterization parameters and physical base parameters, and the determination coefficients between the predicted values of the two models and the measured values are 0.98378 and 0.97613, respectively. The constitutive models of characterization parameters and physical base parameters considering strain effect are also constructed, and a comparative analysis is made. The results show that the predicted values of the characterization parameters constitutive model is closer to the measured values in the low strain region. After reaching the peak strain, the predicted values of the two constitutive models are close to the measured values, and both have high prediction accuracy. The dynamic recrystallization models are established to characterize the recrystallization behavior. The recrystallization activation energy of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel is 169.6793 kJ mol−1, the ratio of critical strain to peak strain is about 0.47074, and the ratio of critical stress to peak stress is about 0.94059. The activation energy of 50% dynamic recrystallization is 29.9844 kJ mol−1. The dynamic recrystallized grain size increases with increasing deformation temperature or decreasing strain rate, and the activation energy of grain growth is −49.9237 kJ mol−1.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S223878542300887618CrNiMo7-6Constitutive modelDynamic recrystallization modelCritical strain
spellingShingle Runze Cao
Wei Wang
Shibo Ma
Huajun Yan
Zhenkai Mu
Shuangjie Zhang
Arrhenius constitutive model and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
18CrNiMo7-6
Constitutive model
Dynamic recrystallization model
Critical strain
title Arrhenius constitutive model and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel
title_full Arrhenius constitutive model and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel
title_fullStr Arrhenius constitutive model and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel
title_full_unstemmed Arrhenius constitutive model and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel
title_short Arrhenius constitutive model and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel
title_sort arrhenius constitutive model and dynamic recrystallization behavior of 18crnimo7 6 steel
topic 18CrNiMo7-6
Constitutive model
Dynamic recrystallization model
Critical strain
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785423008876
work_keys_str_mv AT runzecao arrheniusconstitutivemodelanddynamicrecrystallizationbehaviorof18crnimo76steel
AT weiwang arrheniusconstitutivemodelanddynamicrecrystallizationbehaviorof18crnimo76steel
AT shiboma arrheniusconstitutivemodelanddynamicrecrystallizationbehaviorof18crnimo76steel
AT huajunyan arrheniusconstitutivemodelanddynamicrecrystallizationbehaviorof18crnimo76steel
AT zhenkaimu arrheniusconstitutivemodelanddynamicrecrystallizationbehaviorof18crnimo76steel
AT shuangjiezhang arrheniusconstitutivemodelanddynamicrecrystallizationbehaviorof18crnimo76steel