Comparative study of the gut microbial communities collected by scraping and swabbing in a fish model: a comprehensive guide to promote non-lethal procedures for gut microbial studies

In the present study, we propose the use of swabs in non-lethal sampling procedures to collect the mucosa-adhered gut microbiota from the posterior intestine of fish, and therefore, we compare the bacterial communities collected by conventional scraping and by swabbing methods. For this purpose, sam...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alberto Ruiz, Silvia Torrecillas, Elena Kashinskaya, Karl B. Andree, Mikhail Solovyev, Enric Gisbert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1374803/full
_version_ 1797248575668748288
author Alberto Ruiz
Silvia Torrecillas
Elena Kashinskaya
Elena Kashinskaya
Karl B. Andree
Mikhail Solovyev
Mikhail Solovyev
Mikhail Solovyev
Enric Gisbert
author_facet Alberto Ruiz
Silvia Torrecillas
Elena Kashinskaya
Elena Kashinskaya
Karl B. Andree
Mikhail Solovyev
Mikhail Solovyev
Mikhail Solovyev
Enric Gisbert
author_sort Alberto Ruiz
collection DOAJ
description In the present study, we propose the use of swabs in non-lethal sampling procedures to collect the mucosa-adhered gut microbiota from the posterior intestine of fish, and therefore, we compare the bacterial communities collected by conventional scraping and by swabbing methods. For this purpose, samples of the posterior intestine of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were collected first using the swabbing approach, and after fish euthanasia, by mucosa scraping. Finally, bacterial communities were compared by 16S rRNA gene Illumina sequencing. Results from the current study revealed that similar values of bacterial richness and diversity were found for both sampling procedures. Similarly, there were no differences between procedures when using qualitative metrics (Jaccard and unweighted UniFrac) for estimating inter-individual diversity, but the quantitative metrics (Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac) showed a higher dispersion when samples were obtained by swabbing compared to scraping. In terms of bacterial composition, there were differences in abundance for the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The cause of these differential abundances may be the inability of the swab to access to certain areas, such as the basal region of the intestinal villi. Moreover, swabbing allowed a higher representation of low abundant taxa, which may also have an important role in host microbiome regardless of their low abundance. Overall, our results demonstrate that the sampling method is a factor to be considered in experimental design when studying gut bacterial communities to avoid potential biases in the interpretation or comparison of results from different studies. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure (swabbing vs scraping) are discussed in detail, concluding that swabbing can be implemented as a reliable and non-lethal procedure for posterior gut microbiota studies, which is of particular interest for animal welfare and the 3Rs principle, and may offer a wide range of novel applications.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T20:16:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6c551c6dea04b67b5db8dd0a813900f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-1769
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T20:16:46Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
spelling doaj.art-d6c551c6dea04b67b5db8dd0a813900f2024-03-22T16:56:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692024-03-011110.3389/fvets.2024.13748031374803Comparative study of the gut microbial communities collected by scraping and swabbing in a fish model: a comprehensive guide to promote non-lethal procedures for gut microbial studiesAlberto Ruiz0Silvia Torrecillas1Elena Kashinskaya2Elena Kashinskaya3Karl B. Andree4Mikhail Solovyev5Mikhail Solovyev6Mikhail Solovyev7Enric Gisbert8Aquaculture Program, Centre de La Ràpita, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), La Ràpita, SpainAquaculture Program, Centre de La Ràpita, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), La Ràpita, SpainInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, RussiaA.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, RussiaAquaculture Program, Centre de La Ràpita, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), La Ràpita, SpainInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, RussiaA.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, RussiaBiological Institute, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, RussiaAquaculture Program, Centre de La Ràpita, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), La Ràpita, SpainIn the present study, we propose the use of swabs in non-lethal sampling procedures to collect the mucosa-adhered gut microbiota from the posterior intestine of fish, and therefore, we compare the bacterial communities collected by conventional scraping and by swabbing methods. For this purpose, samples of the posterior intestine of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were collected first using the swabbing approach, and after fish euthanasia, by mucosa scraping. Finally, bacterial communities were compared by 16S rRNA gene Illumina sequencing. Results from the current study revealed that similar values of bacterial richness and diversity were found for both sampling procedures. Similarly, there were no differences between procedures when using qualitative metrics (Jaccard and unweighted UniFrac) for estimating inter-individual diversity, but the quantitative metrics (Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac) showed a higher dispersion when samples were obtained by swabbing compared to scraping. In terms of bacterial composition, there were differences in abundance for the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The cause of these differential abundances may be the inability of the swab to access to certain areas, such as the basal region of the intestinal villi. Moreover, swabbing allowed a higher representation of low abundant taxa, which may also have an important role in host microbiome regardless of their low abundance. Overall, our results demonstrate that the sampling method is a factor to be considered in experimental design when studying gut bacterial communities to avoid potential biases in the interpretation or comparison of results from different studies. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure (swabbing vs scraping) are discussed in detail, concluding that swabbing can be implemented as a reliable and non-lethal procedure for posterior gut microbiota studies, which is of particular interest for animal welfare and the 3Rs principle, and may offer a wide range of novel applications.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1374803/fullfish microbiotamucosaintestinesampling procedureanimal welfarereduction
spellingShingle Alberto Ruiz
Silvia Torrecillas
Elena Kashinskaya
Elena Kashinskaya
Karl B. Andree
Mikhail Solovyev
Mikhail Solovyev
Mikhail Solovyev
Enric Gisbert
Comparative study of the gut microbial communities collected by scraping and swabbing in a fish model: a comprehensive guide to promote non-lethal procedures for gut microbial studies
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
fish microbiota
mucosa
intestine
sampling procedure
animal welfare
reduction
title Comparative study of the gut microbial communities collected by scraping and swabbing in a fish model: a comprehensive guide to promote non-lethal procedures for gut microbial studies
title_full Comparative study of the gut microbial communities collected by scraping and swabbing in a fish model: a comprehensive guide to promote non-lethal procedures for gut microbial studies
title_fullStr Comparative study of the gut microbial communities collected by scraping and swabbing in a fish model: a comprehensive guide to promote non-lethal procedures for gut microbial studies
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of the gut microbial communities collected by scraping and swabbing in a fish model: a comprehensive guide to promote non-lethal procedures for gut microbial studies
title_short Comparative study of the gut microbial communities collected by scraping and swabbing in a fish model: a comprehensive guide to promote non-lethal procedures for gut microbial studies
title_sort comparative study of the gut microbial communities collected by scraping and swabbing in a fish model a comprehensive guide to promote non lethal procedures for gut microbial studies
topic fish microbiota
mucosa
intestine
sampling procedure
animal welfare
reduction
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1374803/full
work_keys_str_mv AT albertoruiz comparativestudyofthegutmicrobialcommunitiescollectedbyscrapingandswabbinginafishmodelacomprehensiveguidetopromotenonlethalproceduresforgutmicrobialstudies
AT silviatorrecillas comparativestudyofthegutmicrobialcommunitiescollectedbyscrapingandswabbinginafishmodelacomprehensiveguidetopromotenonlethalproceduresforgutmicrobialstudies
AT elenakashinskaya comparativestudyofthegutmicrobialcommunitiescollectedbyscrapingandswabbinginafishmodelacomprehensiveguidetopromotenonlethalproceduresforgutmicrobialstudies
AT elenakashinskaya comparativestudyofthegutmicrobialcommunitiescollectedbyscrapingandswabbinginafishmodelacomprehensiveguidetopromotenonlethalproceduresforgutmicrobialstudies
AT karlbandree comparativestudyofthegutmicrobialcommunitiescollectedbyscrapingandswabbinginafishmodelacomprehensiveguidetopromotenonlethalproceduresforgutmicrobialstudies
AT mikhailsolovyev comparativestudyofthegutmicrobialcommunitiescollectedbyscrapingandswabbinginafishmodelacomprehensiveguidetopromotenonlethalproceduresforgutmicrobialstudies
AT mikhailsolovyev comparativestudyofthegutmicrobialcommunitiescollectedbyscrapingandswabbinginafishmodelacomprehensiveguidetopromotenonlethalproceduresforgutmicrobialstudies
AT mikhailsolovyev comparativestudyofthegutmicrobialcommunitiescollectedbyscrapingandswabbinginafishmodelacomprehensiveguidetopromotenonlethalproceduresforgutmicrobialstudies
AT enricgisbert comparativestudyofthegutmicrobialcommunitiescollectedbyscrapingandswabbinginafishmodelacomprehensiveguidetopromotenonlethalproceduresforgutmicrobialstudies