Influence of bone conduction transducer type and placement on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

Abstract Evaluating the effectiveness of different bone conduction (BC) transducers with controlled coupling force to elicit cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) in healthy subjects by comparing response rates, amplitudes, latencies, thresholds and asymmetry rat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Fröhlich, Maira Wilke, Stefan K. Plontke, Torsten Rahne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87682-1
_version_ 1818428917070954496
author Laura Fröhlich
Maira Wilke
Stefan K. Plontke
Torsten Rahne
author_facet Laura Fröhlich
Maira Wilke
Stefan K. Plontke
Torsten Rahne
author_sort Laura Fröhlich
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Evaluating the effectiveness of different bone conduction (BC) transducers with controlled coupling force to elicit cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) in healthy subjects by comparing response rates, amplitudes, latencies, thresholds and asymmetry ratios. Prospective experimental study including healthy participants. VEMPs were measured to different stimulation modes; the BC transducer coupling force was controlled to 5.4 (± 0.5) Newton. cVEMPs: to bone conducted vibration (BCV) with the B81 transducer on the mastoid; oVEMPs: to BCV with the B81 on the mastoid, BCV with the B81 on the forehead, and BCV with the Mini-Shaker 4810 on the forehead. Air conducted sound (ACS) with insert earphones was used as reference. Data of 24 normal subjects (mean age 25.3 (± 3.0) years) were analyzed. ACS and BCV with the B81on the mastoid evoked cVEMPs in 100% of ears. The highest oVEMP response rates were obtained with the B81 on the mastoid (83–92%), the lowest with the B81 on the forehead (17–22%). The Mini-Shaker elicited lower response rates (65%) compared to results from the literature without coupling force control and compared to ACS (78–87%). Amplitudes were higher for BCV than ACS. ACS and BCV on the mastoid caused higher asymmetry compared to BCV forehead stimulation. The B81 was feasible to elicit VEMPs with mastoid placement and can be used as an approved medical device to measure BCV VEMPs in a clinical set-up. Normative asymmetry values have to be established due to higher variability for mastoid stimulation.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T15:09:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6caf5e3e2fc42ada9861eb91ab9e841
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T15:09:14Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-d6caf5e3e2fc42ada9861eb91ab9e8412022-12-21T22:56:38ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-04-011111810.1038/s41598-021-87682-1Influence of bone conduction transducer type and placement on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentialsLaura Fröhlich0Maira Wilke1Stefan K. Plontke2Torsten Rahne3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale)Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale)Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale)Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale)Abstract Evaluating the effectiveness of different bone conduction (BC) transducers with controlled coupling force to elicit cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) in healthy subjects by comparing response rates, amplitudes, latencies, thresholds and asymmetry ratios. Prospective experimental study including healthy participants. VEMPs were measured to different stimulation modes; the BC transducer coupling force was controlled to 5.4 (± 0.5) Newton. cVEMPs: to bone conducted vibration (BCV) with the B81 transducer on the mastoid; oVEMPs: to BCV with the B81 on the mastoid, BCV with the B81 on the forehead, and BCV with the Mini-Shaker 4810 on the forehead. Air conducted sound (ACS) with insert earphones was used as reference. Data of 24 normal subjects (mean age 25.3 (± 3.0) years) were analyzed. ACS and BCV with the B81on the mastoid evoked cVEMPs in 100% of ears. The highest oVEMP response rates were obtained with the B81 on the mastoid (83–92%), the lowest with the B81 on the forehead (17–22%). The Mini-Shaker elicited lower response rates (65%) compared to results from the literature without coupling force control and compared to ACS (78–87%). Amplitudes were higher for BCV than ACS. ACS and BCV on the mastoid caused higher asymmetry compared to BCV forehead stimulation. The B81 was feasible to elicit VEMPs with mastoid placement and can be used as an approved medical device to measure BCV VEMPs in a clinical set-up. Normative asymmetry values have to be established due to higher variability for mastoid stimulation.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87682-1
spellingShingle Laura Fröhlich
Maira Wilke
Stefan K. Plontke
Torsten Rahne
Influence of bone conduction transducer type and placement on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
Scientific Reports
title Influence of bone conduction transducer type and placement on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
title_full Influence of bone conduction transducer type and placement on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
title_fullStr Influence of bone conduction transducer type and placement on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
title_full_unstemmed Influence of bone conduction transducer type and placement on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
title_short Influence of bone conduction transducer type and placement on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
title_sort influence of bone conduction transducer type and placement on ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87682-1
work_keys_str_mv AT laurafrohlich influenceofboneconductiontransducertypeandplacementonocularandcervicalvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentials
AT mairawilke influenceofboneconductiontransducertypeandplacementonocularandcervicalvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentials
AT stefankplontke influenceofboneconductiontransducertypeandplacementonocularandcervicalvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentials
AT torstenrahne influenceofboneconductiontransducertypeandplacementonocularandcervicalvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentials