J. Ortega y Gasset's Vital Reason and M. Heidegger'sExistential Analytic
According to Heidegger, being cannot be taken as a blind starting point or belief. Ortega y Gasset’s critique of this approach to the problem of being reveals the distance between two perspectives that are, nevertheless, joined by the actual horizon they explore: human life. However, their results a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
2012-04-01
|
Series: | Ideas y Valores |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/viewFile/20083/30169 |
_version_ | 1811287530936467456 |
---|---|
author | Francesco de Nigris |
author_facet | Francesco de Nigris |
author_sort | Francesco de Nigris |
collection | DOAJ |
description | According to Heidegger, being cannot be taken as a blind starting point or belief. Ortega y Gasset’s critique of this approach to the problem of being reveals the distance between two perspectives that are, nevertheless, joined by the actual horizon they explore: human life. However, their results are different because the analysis of Dasein aims at discovering the general meaning of being, while Ortega’s conception of being as a belief, as a historical interpretation of life linked to a “way of thinking”, turns his analysis of vital reason into a personal project of salvation. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:19:01Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d6d0ef7632db49a9a9c46c46e1c215ce |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0120-0062 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:19:01Z |
publishDate | 2012-04-01 |
publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
record_format | Article |
series | Ideas y Valores |
spelling | doaj.art-d6d0ef7632db49a9a9c46c46e1c215ce2022-12-22T03:04:49ZengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaIdeas y Valores0120-00622012-04-0161148115129J. Ortega y Gasset's Vital Reason and M. Heidegger'sExistential AnalyticFrancesco de NigrisAccording to Heidegger, being cannot be taken as a blind starting point or belief. Ortega y Gasset’s critique of this approach to the problem of being reveals the distance between two perspectives that are, nevertheless, joined by the actual horizon they explore: human life. However, their results are different because the analysis of Dasein aims at discovering the general meaning of being, while Ortega’s conception of being as a belief, as a historical interpretation of life linked to a “way of thinking”, turns his analysis of vital reason into a personal project of salvation.http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/viewFile/20083/30169M. HeideggerJ. Ortega y GassetBeingExistencePerson |
spellingShingle | Francesco de Nigris J. Ortega y Gasset's Vital Reason and M. Heidegger'sExistential Analytic Ideas y Valores M. Heidegger J. Ortega y Gasset Being Existence Person |
title | J. Ortega y Gasset's Vital Reason and M. Heidegger'sExistential Analytic |
title_full | J. Ortega y Gasset's Vital Reason and M. Heidegger'sExistential Analytic |
title_fullStr | J. Ortega y Gasset's Vital Reason and M. Heidegger'sExistential Analytic |
title_full_unstemmed | J. Ortega y Gasset's Vital Reason and M. Heidegger'sExistential Analytic |
title_short | J. Ortega y Gasset's Vital Reason and M. Heidegger'sExistential Analytic |
title_sort | j ortega y gasset s vital reason and m heidegger sexistential analytic |
topic | M. Heidegger J. Ortega y Gasset Being Existence Person |
url | http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/viewFile/20083/30169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT francescodenigris jortegaygassetsvitalreasonandmheideggersexistentialanalytic |