Religiosity and Generosity: Multi-Level Approaches to Studying the Religiousness of Prosocial Actions

This paper provides a meta-analysis of the intersection of (a) religiosity and spirituality with (b) generosity, philanthropy, nonprofits, and prosociality. The study is informed by three informational sources, chronologically: (1) informational interviews with scholars and practitioners based withi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patricia Snell Herzog, Amy Strohmeier, David P. King, Rafia A. Khader, Andrew L. Williams, Jamie L. Goodwin, Dana R. H. Doan, Bhekinkosi Moyo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/9/446
_version_ 1797555011010428928
author Patricia Snell Herzog
Amy Strohmeier
David P. King
Rafia A. Khader
Andrew L. Williams
Jamie L. Goodwin
Dana R. H. Doan
Bhekinkosi Moyo
author_facet Patricia Snell Herzog
Amy Strohmeier
David P. King
Rafia A. Khader
Andrew L. Williams
Jamie L. Goodwin
Dana R. H. Doan
Bhekinkosi Moyo
author_sort Patricia Snell Herzog
collection DOAJ
description This paper provides a meta-analysis of the intersection of (a) religiosity and spirituality with (b) generosity, philanthropy, nonprofits, and prosociality. The study is informed by three informational sources, chronologically: (1) informational interviews with scholars and practitioners based within and studying regions outside of the U.S. and Western Europe; (2) discovery search of purposefully selected extant publications, especially focusing on the last decade of contemporary scholarship; and (3) systematic search of relevant peer-reviewed publication outlets since 2010. Reviewed publications are categorized by level of analysis into macro, meso, and micro approaches. Across each level and source, publications are also geo-tagged for their geographic scope. Particular attention is paid to the under-studied world regions of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. The results reveal that Asia is the most studied and Latin America the least studied, and that meso-level approaches are the most common while micro-level are the least common. Additionally, a map of publication counts reveals within-region inequalities by country. Implications of the analysis are drawn for future studies, particularly ways to advance this interdisciplinary field.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:40:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6e5c9df446140bc845c78ae7066a1bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:40:10Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-d6e5c9df446140bc845c78ae7066a1bb2023-11-20T12:04:42ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442020-08-0111944610.3390/rel11090446Religiosity and Generosity: Multi-Level Approaches to Studying the Religiousness of Prosocial ActionsPatricia Snell Herzog0Amy Strohmeier1David P. King2Rafia A. Khader3Andrew L. Williams4Jamie L. Goodwin5Dana R. H. Doan6Bhekinkosi Moyo7Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USAIndiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USAIndiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USAIndiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USAIndiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USAIndiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USAIndiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USAWits Business School, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South AfricaThis paper provides a meta-analysis of the intersection of (a) religiosity and spirituality with (b) generosity, philanthropy, nonprofits, and prosociality. The study is informed by three informational sources, chronologically: (1) informational interviews with scholars and practitioners based within and studying regions outside of the U.S. and Western Europe; (2) discovery search of purposefully selected extant publications, especially focusing on the last decade of contemporary scholarship; and (3) systematic search of relevant peer-reviewed publication outlets since 2010. Reviewed publications are categorized by level of analysis into macro, meso, and micro approaches. Across each level and source, publications are also geo-tagged for their geographic scope. Particular attention is paid to the under-studied world regions of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. The results reveal that Asia is the most studied and Latin America the least studied, and that meso-level approaches are the most common while micro-level are the least common. Additionally, a map of publication counts reveals within-region inequalities by country. Implications of the analysis are drawn for future studies, particularly ways to advance this interdisciplinary field.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/9/446religiosityspiritualitygenerosityphilanthropynonprofitsNGOs
spellingShingle Patricia Snell Herzog
Amy Strohmeier
David P. King
Rafia A. Khader
Andrew L. Williams
Jamie L. Goodwin
Dana R. H. Doan
Bhekinkosi Moyo
Religiosity and Generosity: Multi-Level Approaches to Studying the Religiousness of Prosocial Actions
Religions
religiosity
spirituality
generosity
philanthropy
nonprofits
NGOs
title Religiosity and Generosity: Multi-Level Approaches to Studying the Religiousness of Prosocial Actions
title_full Religiosity and Generosity: Multi-Level Approaches to Studying the Religiousness of Prosocial Actions
title_fullStr Religiosity and Generosity: Multi-Level Approaches to Studying the Religiousness of Prosocial Actions
title_full_unstemmed Religiosity and Generosity: Multi-Level Approaches to Studying the Religiousness of Prosocial Actions
title_short Religiosity and Generosity: Multi-Level Approaches to Studying the Religiousness of Prosocial Actions
title_sort religiosity and generosity multi level approaches to studying the religiousness of prosocial actions
topic religiosity
spirituality
generosity
philanthropy
nonprofits
NGOs
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/9/446
work_keys_str_mv AT patriciasnellherzog religiosityandgenerositymultilevelapproachestostudyingthereligiousnessofprosocialactions
AT amystrohmeier religiosityandgenerositymultilevelapproachestostudyingthereligiousnessofprosocialactions
AT davidpking religiosityandgenerositymultilevelapproachestostudyingthereligiousnessofprosocialactions
AT rafiaakhader religiosityandgenerositymultilevelapproachestostudyingthereligiousnessofprosocialactions
AT andrewlwilliams religiosityandgenerositymultilevelapproachestostudyingthereligiousnessofprosocialactions
AT jamielgoodwin religiosityandgenerositymultilevelapproachestostudyingthereligiousnessofprosocialactions
AT danarhdoan religiosityandgenerositymultilevelapproachestostudyingthereligiousnessofprosocialactions
AT bhekinkosimoyo religiosityandgenerositymultilevelapproachestostudyingthereligiousnessofprosocialactions