Dissolution test for oral suspension: an overview about use and importance

Abstract This work aims to ascertain the comprehensiveness of dissolution tests for oral suspensions registered in Brazil and the USA. After consulting literature since 1994, a paucity of information about dissolution methods for suspensions was detected. It makes it difficult to establish the most...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thaís dos Santos Paulino Soares, Jacqueline de Souza, Lorena de Sousa Rosa, Flávia Dias Marques-Marinho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo 2022-06-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-82502022000100603&tlng=en
_version_ 1811342617650135040
author Thaís dos Santos Paulino Soares
Jacqueline de Souza
Lorena de Sousa Rosa
Flávia Dias Marques-Marinho
author_facet Thaís dos Santos Paulino Soares
Jacqueline de Souza
Lorena de Sousa Rosa
Flávia Dias Marques-Marinho
author_sort Thaís dos Santos Paulino Soares
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This work aims to ascertain the comprehensiveness of dissolution tests for oral suspensions registered in Brazil and the USA. After consulting literature since 1994, a paucity of information about dissolution methods for suspensions was detected. It makes it difficult to establish the most appropriate test parameters. In January, 2019, there were 46 drugs registered in Anvisa (Brazil) as oral suspension, being 47 reference, 173 generic and 114 interchangeable similar (IS) medicines; while in the USA, 90 drugs were registered as oral suspension by FDA, 235 Abreviatted New Drug Application and 111 New Drug Application medicines. Out of 46 and 90, only six and 15 drugs as oral suspension had a pharmacopeial dissolution test, corresponding to 70 (20.9%) and 82 (23.7%) products in Brazil and the USA, respectively. Dissolution studies were found for 17 drugs as oral suspension in the non-compendial literature. Dissolution test conditions were established to few marketable oral suspension drugs, most of which are BCS class II or IV. Thus, investing in dissolution studies could subsidize the registration of these products by regulators, especially for generic and IS drugs, by comparing dissolution profiles, and predicting their in vivo behavior to avoid exposure of healthy individuals to clinical research.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T19:15:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6e92ec7a73f4ea6b3f498466eb34804
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2175-9790
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T19:15:08Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Universidade de São Paulo
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d6e92ec7a73f4ea6b3f498466eb348042022-12-22T02:33:43ZengUniversidade de São PauloBrazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences2175-97902022-06-015810.1590/s2175-97902022e19423Dissolution test for oral suspension: an overview about use and importanceThaís dos Santos Paulino SoaresJacqueline de Souzahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0869-023XLorena de Sousa RosaFlávia Dias Marques-Marinhohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1121-5205Abstract This work aims to ascertain the comprehensiveness of dissolution tests for oral suspensions registered in Brazil and the USA. After consulting literature since 1994, a paucity of information about dissolution methods for suspensions was detected. It makes it difficult to establish the most appropriate test parameters. In January, 2019, there were 46 drugs registered in Anvisa (Brazil) as oral suspension, being 47 reference, 173 generic and 114 interchangeable similar (IS) medicines; while in the USA, 90 drugs were registered as oral suspension by FDA, 235 Abreviatted New Drug Application and 111 New Drug Application medicines. Out of 46 and 90, only six and 15 drugs as oral suspension had a pharmacopeial dissolution test, corresponding to 70 (20.9%) and 82 (23.7%) products in Brazil and the USA, respectively. Dissolution studies were found for 17 drugs as oral suspension in the non-compendial literature. Dissolution test conditions were established to few marketable oral suspension drugs, most of which are BCS class II or IV. Thus, investing in dissolution studies could subsidize the registration of these products by regulators, especially for generic and IS drugs, by comparing dissolution profiles, and predicting their in vivo behavior to avoid exposure of healthy individuals to clinical research.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-82502022000100603&tlng=enDissolutionSuspensionTherapeutic equivalenceRegulatory
spellingShingle Thaís dos Santos Paulino Soares
Jacqueline de Souza
Lorena de Sousa Rosa
Flávia Dias Marques-Marinho
Dissolution test for oral suspension: an overview about use and importance
Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Dissolution
Suspension
Therapeutic equivalence
Regulatory
title Dissolution test for oral suspension: an overview about use and importance
title_full Dissolution test for oral suspension: an overview about use and importance
title_fullStr Dissolution test for oral suspension: an overview about use and importance
title_full_unstemmed Dissolution test for oral suspension: an overview about use and importance
title_short Dissolution test for oral suspension: an overview about use and importance
title_sort dissolution test for oral suspension an overview about use and importance
topic Dissolution
Suspension
Therapeutic equivalence
Regulatory
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-82502022000100603&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT thaisdossantospaulinosoares dissolutiontestfororalsuspensionanoverviewaboutuseandimportance
AT jacquelinedesouza dissolutiontestfororalsuspensionanoverviewaboutuseandimportance
AT lorenadesousarosa dissolutiontestfororalsuspensionanoverviewaboutuseandimportance
AT flaviadiasmarquesmarinho dissolutiontestfororalsuspensionanoverviewaboutuseandimportance