Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart.

The idea of implementing genetics-based insect control strategies modelled on the traditional SIT is becoming increasingly popular. In this paper we compare a genetically modified line of Aedes aegypti carrying a tetracycline repressible, lethal positive feedback system (OX513A) with its wild type c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irka Bargielowski, Luke Alphey, Jacob C Koella
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3191171?pdf=render
_version_ 1819226631715160064
author Irka Bargielowski
Luke Alphey
Jacob C Koella
author_facet Irka Bargielowski
Luke Alphey
Jacob C Koella
author_sort Irka Bargielowski
collection DOAJ
description The idea of implementing genetics-based insect control strategies modelled on the traditional SIT is becoming increasingly popular. In this paper we compare a genetically modified line of Aedes aegypti carrying a tetracycline repressible, lethal positive feedback system (OX513A) with its wild type counterpart with respect to their insemination capacities and the cost of courtship and mating. Genetically modified males inseminated just over half as many females as the wild type males during their lifetime. Providing days of rest from mating had no significant effect on the total number of females inseminated by males of either line, but it did increase their longevity. Producing sperm had a low cost in terms of energy investment; the cost of transferring this sperm to a receptive female was much higher. Continued mating attempts with refractory females suggest that males could not identify refractory females before investing substantial energy in courtship. Although over a lifetime OX513A males inseminated fewer females, the number of females inseminated over the first three days, was similar between males of the two lines, suggesting that the identified cost of RIDL may have little impact on the outcome of SIT-based control programmes with frequent releases of the genetically modified males.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T10:28:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6f3077f39694c19b197c1ad34569d78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T10:28:34Z
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-d6f3077f39694c19b197c1ad34569d782022-12-21T17:50:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-01610e2608610.1371/journal.pone.0026086Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart.Irka BargielowskiLuke AlpheyJacob C KoellaThe idea of implementing genetics-based insect control strategies modelled on the traditional SIT is becoming increasingly popular. In this paper we compare a genetically modified line of Aedes aegypti carrying a tetracycline repressible, lethal positive feedback system (OX513A) with its wild type counterpart with respect to their insemination capacities and the cost of courtship and mating. Genetically modified males inseminated just over half as many females as the wild type males during their lifetime. Providing days of rest from mating had no significant effect on the total number of females inseminated by males of either line, but it did increase their longevity. Producing sperm had a low cost in terms of energy investment; the cost of transferring this sperm to a receptive female was much higher. Continued mating attempts with refractory females suggest that males could not identify refractory females before investing substantial energy in courtship. Although over a lifetime OX513A males inseminated fewer females, the number of females inseminated over the first three days, was similar between males of the two lines, suggesting that the identified cost of RIDL may have little impact on the outcome of SIT-based control programmes with frequent releases of the genetically modified males.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3191171?pdf=render
spellingShingle Irka Bargielowski
Luke Alphey
Jacob C Koella
Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart.
PLoS ONE
title Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart.
title_full Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart.
title_fullStr Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart.
title_full_unstemmed Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart.
title_short Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart.
title_sort cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito aedes aegypti ox513a compared to its wild type counterpart
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3191171?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT irkabargielowski costofmatingandinseminationcapacityofageneticallymodifiedmosquitoaedesaegyptiox513acomparedtoitswildtypecounterpart
AT lukealphey costofmatingandinseminationcapacityofageneticallymodifiedmosquitoaedesaegyptiox513acomparedtoitswildtypecounterpart
AT jacobckoella costofmatingandinseminationcapacityofageneticallymodifiedmosquitoaedesaegyptiox513acomparedtoitswildtypecounterpart