The legitimation and criticism of violence in international law. A po¬litical science perspective
This article considers the practice of justification of arbitrary use of force, which poses a paradox and was not foreseen in Kant’s peace project. It is paradoxical because modern international law — unlike classical law — is aimed not at regulating wars but maintaining peace. However, the UN Chart...
Main Author: | Brock L. |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
2013-12-01
|
Series: | Кантовский сборник |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/bfc/Brock_30-41.pdf |
Similar Items
-
THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT: ITS RISE AND DEMISE
by: Dogachan Dagi
Published: (2020-08-01) -
International law and humanitarian intervention
by: Savić Sava
Published: (2007-01-01) -
REVISITING THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT AS AN INTERNATIONAL NORM
by: Swatilekha Bhattacharya
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Past, present and future of the «Responsibility to protect»: a bumpy journey
by: Vítor Manuel Ramon Fernandes
Published: (2017-11-01) -
The Concept of Humanitarian Intervention and Applicable International Law
by: J. K. Shaiymbetova
Published: (2009-09-01)