‘The Signature of Architecture’: Compositional Ideas in the Theory of Profiles

The theory of profiles from the fifteenth to the nineteenth century is subtly distinct from the theory of the architectural orders. Francesco di Giorgio initiated the topic with his analogy of cornice and facial profiles. Michelangelo further exploited the conceit, while also developing the formal,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Hill, Peter Kohane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2015-11-01
Series:Architectural Histories
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.eahn.org/articles/133
_version_ 1811245616652615680
author Michael Hill
Peter Kohane
author_facet Michael Hill
Peter Kohane
author_sort Michael Hill
collection DOAJ
description The theory of profiles from the fifteenth to the nineteenth century is subtly distinct from the theory of the architectural orders. Francesco di Giorgio initiated the topic with his analogy of cornice and facial profiles. Michelangelo further exploited the conceit, while also developing the formal, particularly skiagraphical, potential of mouldings. In the seventeenth century, Vincenzo Scamozzi set the archaeological findings of architects into a framework of rhetoric, which furnished terms for formal analysis, audience reception, and ornamental affects. Rhetoric also encouraged profiles to be understood in terms of symmetry and decorum, so that the composition befitted its place within the genre of the order and the building. If the rhetorical model was applied to profiles, it could also be applied to architecture as a whole, in which case profiles were the equivalent to the rhetorical category of elocutio, which was the context for Boffrand’s treatment of profiles in the eighteenth century. And if profiles spoke, they could have character, as Jacques François Blondel would so famously demonstrate soon after. In contrast, William Chambers saw mouldings in terms of the expression of weight, an idea so appealing to Francesco Milizia that he copied Chambers’s entire account of the topic into his own 'Principii'. Chambers’s implicit structural rationalism, however, was not so much a message from the future as a statement of the desirability of coherence, with each part performing its allotted role, in keeping with the rhetorical principle that expression must both fit together and be fitted to its purpose. The paper argues that rather than being minor details, mouldings encapsulated wider theories of expression — ‘the signature of architecture’.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T14:42:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d6fcc42609394a3495f3d0412b899361
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-5833
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T14:42:02Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher Open Library of Humanities
record_format Article
series Architectural Histories
spelling doaj.art-d6fcc42609394a3495f3d0412b8993612022-12-22T03:28:48ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesArchitectural Histories2050-58332015-11-013110.5334/ah.cu82‘The Signature of Architecture’: Compositional Ideas in the Theory of ProfilesMichael Hill0Peter Kohane1National Art SchoolUniversity of New South WalesThe theory of profiles from the fifteenth to the nineteenth century is subtly distinct from the theory of the architectural orders. Francesco di Giorgio initiated the topic with his analogy of cornice and facial profiles. Michelangelo further exploited the conceit, while also developing the formal, particularly skiagraphical, potential of mouldings. In the seventeenth century, Vincenzo Scamozzi set the archaeological findings of architects into a framework of rhetoric, which furnished terms for formal analysis, audience reception, and ornamental affects. Rhetoric also encouraged profiles to be understood in terms of symmetry and decorum, so that the composition befitted its place within the genre of the order and the building. If the rhetorical model was applied to profiles, it could also be applied to architecture as a whole, in which case profiles were the equivalent to the rhetorical category of elocutio, which was the context for Boffrand’s treatment of profiles in the eighteenth century. And if profiles spoke, they could have character, as Jacques François Blondel would so famously demonstrate soon after. In contrast, William Chambers saw mouldings in terms of the expression of weight, an idea so appealing to Francesco Milizia that he copied Chambers’s entire account of the topic into his own 'Principii'. Chambers’s implicit structural rationalism, however, was not so much a message from the future as a statement of the desirability of coherence, with each part performing its allotted role, in keeping with the rhetorical principle that expression must both fit together and be fitted to its purpose. The paper argues that rather than being minor details, mouldings encapsulated wider theories of expression — ‘the signature of architecture’.http://journal.eahn.org/articles/133Classical architecture, Mouldings, Architectural Theory, Rhetoric
spellingShingle Michael Hill
Peter Kohane
‘The Signature of Architecture’: Compositional Ideas in the Theory of Profiles
Architectural Histories
Classical architecture, Mouldings, Architectural Theory, Rhetoric
title ‘The Signature of Architecture’: Compositional Ideas in the Theory of Profiles
title_full ‘The Signature of Architecture’: Compositional Ideas in the Theory of Profiles
title_fullStr ‘The Signature of Architecture’: Compositional Ideas in the Theory of Profiles
title_full_unstemmed ‘The Signature of Architecture’: Compositional Ideas in the Theory of Profiles
title_short ‘The Signature of Architecture’: Compositional Ideas in the Theory of Profiles
title_sort the signature of architecture compositional ideas in the theory of profiles
topic Classical architecture, Mouldings, Architectural Theory, Rhetoric
url http://journal.eahn.org/articles/133
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelhill thesignatureofarchitecturecompositionalideasinthetheoryofprofiles
AT peterkohane thesignatureofarchitecturecompositionalideasinthetheoryofprofiles