Quantifying the Contribution of Driving Factors on Distribution and Change of Net Primary Productivity of Vegetation in the Mongolian Plateau
In recent years, multiple disturbances have significantly altered terrestrial ecosystems in arid and semi-arid regions, particularly on the Mongolian Plateau (MP). Net primary productivity (<i>NPP</i>) of vegetation is an essential component of the surface carbon cycle. As such, it chara...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-04-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/8/1986 |
_version_ | 1797603676831875072 |
---|---|
author | Chaohua Yin Xiaoqi Chen Min Luo Fanhao Meng Chula Sa Shanhu Bao Zhihui Yuan Xiang Zhang Yuhai Bao |
author_facet | Chaohua Yin Xiaoqi Chen Min Luo Fanhao Meng Chula Sa Shanhu Bao Zhihui Yuan Xiang Zhang Yuhai Bao |
author_sort | Chaohua Yin |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In recent years, multiple disturbances have significantly altered terrestrial ecosystems in arid and semi-arid regions, particularly on the Mongolian Plateau (MP). Net primary productivity (<i>NPP</i>) of vegetation is an essential component of the surface carbon cycle. As such, it characterizes the state of variation in terrestrial ecosystems and reflects the productive capacity of natural vegetation. This study revealed the complex relationship between the natural environment and NPP in the ecologically fragile and sensitive MP. The modified Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model was used to simulate vegetation NPP. Further, the contributions of topography, vegetation, soils, and climate to NPP’s distribution and spatiotemporal variation were explored using the geographic detector model (GDM) and structural equation model (SEM). The study’s findings indicate the following: (1) NPPs for different vegetation types in the MP were in the order of broad-leaved forest > meadow steppe > coniferous forest > cropland > shrub > typical steppe > sandy land > alpine steppe > desert steppe. (2) NPP showed an increasing trend during the growing seasons from 2000 to 2019, with forests providing larger vegetation carbon stocks. It also maintained a more stable level of productivity. (3) Vegetation cover, precipitation, soil moisture, and solar radiation were the key factors affecting NPP’s spatial distribution. NPP’s spatial distribution was primarily explained by the normalized difference vegetation index, solar radiation, precipitation, vegetation type, soil moisture, and soil type (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi>q</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula>-statistics = 0.86, 0.71, 0.67, 0.67, 0.57, and 0.57, respectively); the contribution of temperature was small (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi>q</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula>-statistics = 0.26), and topographic factors had the least influence on NPP’s distribution, as their contribution amounted to less than 0.20. (4) A SEM constructed based on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), solar radiation, precipitation, temperature, and soil moisture explained 17% to 65% of the MP’s NPP variations. The total effects of the MP’s NPP variations in absolute values were in the order of NDVI (0.47) > precipitation (0.33) > soil moisture (0.16) > temperature (0.14) > solar radiation (0.02), and the mechanisms responsible for NPP variations differed slightly among the relevant vegetation types. Overall, this study can help understand the mechanisms responsible for the MP’s NPP variations and offer a new perspective for regional vegetation ecosystem management. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T04:35:22Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d702a3d78ab142db82d29458f690b619 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2072-4292 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T04:35:22Z |
publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Remote Sensing |
spelling | doaj.art-d702a3d78ab142db82d29458f690b6192023-11-17T21:10:25ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-04-01158198610.3390/rs15081986Quantifying the Contribution of Driving Factors on Distribution and Change of Net Primary Productivity of Vegetation in the Mongolian PlateauChaohua Yin0Xiaoqi Chen1Min Luo2Fanhao Meng3Chula Sa4Shanhu Bao5Zhihui Yuan6Xiang Zhang7Yuhai Bao8College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, ChinaCollege of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, ChinaCollege of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, ChinaCollege of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, ChinaCollege of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, ChinaCollege of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, ChinaCollege of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, ChinaCollege of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, ChinaCollege of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, ChinaIn recent years, multiple disturbances have significantly altered terrestrial ecosystems in arid and semi-arid regions, particularly on the Mongolian Plateau (MP). Net primary productivity (<i>NPP</i>) of vegetation is an essential component of the surface carbon cycle. As such, it characterizes the state of variation in terrestrial ecosystems and reflects the productive capacity of natural vegetation. This study revealed the complex relationship between the natural environment and NPP in the ecologically fragile and sensitive MP. The modified Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model was used to simulate vegetation NPP. Further, the contributions of topography, vegetation, soils, and climate to NPP’s distribution and spatiotemporal variation were explored using the geographic detector model (GDM) and structural equation model (SEM). The study’s findings indicate the following: (1) NPPs for different vegetation types in the MP were in the order of broad-leaved forest > meadow steppe > coniferous forest > cropland > shrub > typical steppe > sandy land > alpine steppe > desert steppe. (2) NPP showed an increasing trend during the growing seasons from 2000 to 2019, with forests providing larger vegetation carbon stocks. It also maintained a more stable level of productivity. (3) Vegetation cover, precipitation, soil moisture, and solar radiation were the key factors affecting NPP’s spatial distribution. NPP’s spatial distribution was primarily explained by the normalized difference vegetation index, solar radiation, precipitation, vegetation type, soil moisture, and soil type (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi>q</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula>-statistics = 0.86, 0.71, 0.67, 0.67, 0.57, and 0.57, respectively); the contribution of temperature was small (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi>q</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula>-statistics = 0.26), and topographic factors had the least influence on NPP’s distribution, as their contribution amounted to less than 0.20. (4) A SEM constructed based on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), solar radiation, precipitation, temperature, and soil moisture explained 17% to 65% of the MP’s NPP variations. The total effects of the MP’s NPP variations in absolute values were in the order of NDVI (0.47) > precipitation (0.33) > soil moisture (0.16) > temperature (0.14) > solar radiation (0.02), and the mechanisms responsible for NPP variations differed slightly among the relevant vegetation types. Overall, this study can help understand the mechanisms responsible for the MP’s NPP variations and offer a new perspective for regional vegetation ecosystem management.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/8/1986net primary productivitygeographic detector modelstructural equation modelmodified CASA modelMongolian Plateau |
spellingShingle | Chaohua Yin Xiaoqi Chen Min Luo Fanhao Meng Chula Sa Shanhu Bao Zhihui Yuan Xiang Zhang Yuhai Bao Quantifying the Contribution of Driving Factors on Distribution and Change of Net Primary Productivity of Vegetation in the Mongolian Plateau Remote Sensing net primary productivity geographic detector model structural equation model modified CASA model Mongolian Plateau |
title | Quantifying the Contribution of Driving Factors on Distribution and Change of Net Primary Productivity of Vegetation in the Mongolian Plateau |
title_full | Quantifying the Contribution of Driving Factors on Distribution and Change of Net Primary Productivity of Vegetation in the Mongolian Plateau |
title_fullStr | Quantifying the Contribution of Driving Factors on Distribution and Change of Net Primary Productivity of Vegetation in the Mongolian Plateau |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying the Contribution of Driving Factors on Distribution and Change of Net Primary Productivity of Vegetation in the Mongolian Plateau |
title_short | Quantifying the Contribution of Driving Factors on Distribution and Change of Net Primary Productivity of Vegetation in the Mongolian Plateau |
title_sort | quantifying the contribution of driving factors on distribution and change of net primary productivity of vegetation in the mongolian plateau |
topic | net primary productivity geographic detector model structural equation model modified CASA model Mongolian Plateau |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/8/1986 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaohuayin quantifyingthecontributionofdrivingfactorsondistributionandchangeofnetprimaryproductivityofvegetationinthemongolianplateau AT xiaoqichen quantifyingthecontributionofdrivingfactorsondistributionandchangeofnetprimaryproductivityofvegetationinthemongolianplateau AT minluo quantifyingthecontributionofdrivingfactorsondistributionandchangeofnetprimaryproductivityofvegetationinthemongolianplateau AT fanhaomeng quantifyingthecontributionofdrivingfactorsondistributionandchangeofnetprimaryproductivityofvegetationinthemongolianplateau AT chulasa quantifyingthecontributionofdrivingfactorsondistributionandchangeofnetprimaryproductivityofvegetationinthemongolianplateau AT shanhubao quantifyingthecontributionofdrivingfactorsondistributionandchangeofnetprimaryproductivityofvegetationinthemongolianplateau AT zhihuiyuan quantifyingthecontributionofdrivingfactorsondistributionandchangeofnetprimaryproductivityofvegetationinthemongolianplateau AT xiangzhang quantifyingthecontributionofdrivingfactorsondistributionandchangeofnetprimaryproductivityofvegetationinthemongolianplateau AT yuhaibao quantifyingthecontributionofdrivingfactorsondistributionandchangeofnetprimaryproductivityofvegetationinthemongolianplateau |