Manipulation of the follicular phase: Uterodomes and pregnancy - is there a correlation?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Manipulation of the follicular phase uterine epithelium in women undergoing infertility treatment, has not generally shown differing morphological effects on uterine epithelial characteristics using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Terry Vera, Gayer Nalini, Adams Susan M, Murphy Christopher R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2001-07-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/1/2
_version_ 1818068301331300352
author Terry Vera
Gayer Nalini
Adams Susan M
Murphy Christopher R
author_facet Terry Vera
Gayer Nalini
Adams Susan M
Murphy Christopher R
author_sort Terry Vera
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Manipulation of the follicular phase uterine epithelium in women undergoing infertility treatment, has not generally shown differing morphological effects on uterine epithelial characteristics using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and resultant pregnancy rates have remained suboptimal utilising these manipulations. The present study observed manipulation of the proliferative epithelium, with either 7 or 14 days of sequential oestrogen (E) therapy followed by progesterone (P) and assessed the appearance of pinopods (now called uterodomes) for their usefulness as potential implantation markers in seven women who subsequently became pregnant. Three endometrial biopsies per patient were taken during consecutive cycles: day 19 of a natural cycle - (group 1), days 11/12 of a second cycle after 7 days E then P - (group 2), and days 19/22 of a third cycle after 14 days E then P - (group 3). Embryo transfer (ET) was performed in a subsequent long treatment cycle (as per Group 3).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Seven pregnancies resulted in seven viable births including one twins and one miscarriage. Analysis of the individual regimes showed 5 days of P treatment to have a higher correlation for uterodomes in all 3 cycles observed individually. It was also observed that all 7 women demonstrated the appearance of uterodomes in at least one of their cycles.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We conclude that manipulation of the follicular phase by shortening the period of E exposure to 7 days, does not compromise uterine epithelial morphology and we add weight to the conclusion that uterodomes indicate a receptive endometrium for implantation.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T15:37:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d71c546d887944f38a5ca6f927f75012
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T15:37:24Z
publishDate 2001-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-d71c546d887944f38a5ca6f927f750122022-12-22T01:43:13ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932001-07-0111210.1186/1471-2393-1-2Manipulation of the follicular phase: Uterodomes and pregnancy - is there a correlation?Terry VeraGayer NaliniAdams Susan MMurphy Christopher R<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Manipulation of the follicular phase uterine epithelium in women undergoing infertility treatment, has not generally shown differing morphological effects on uterine epithelial characteristics using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and resultant pregnancy rates have remained suboptimal utilising these manipulations. The present study observed manipulation of the proliferative epithelium, with either 7 or 14 days of sequential oestrogen (E) therapy followed by progesterone (P) and assessed the appearance of pinopods (now called uterodomes) for their usefulness as potential implantation markers in seven women who subsequently became pregnant. Three endometrial biopsies per patient were taken during consecutive cycles: day 19 of a natural cycle - (group 1), days 11/12 of a second cycle after 7 days E then P - (group 2), and days 19/22 of a third cycle after 14 days E then P - (group 3). Embryo transfer (ET) was performed in a subsequent long treatment cycle (as per Group 3).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Seven pregnancies resulted in seven viable births including one twins and one miscarriage. Analysis of the individual regimes showed 5 days of P treatment to have a higher correlation for uterodomes in all 3 cycles observed individually. It was also observed that all 7 women demonstrated the appearance of uterodomes in at least one of their cycles.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We conclude that manipulation of the follicular phase by shortening the period of E exposure to 7 days, does not compromise uterine epithelial morphology and we add weight to the conclusion that uterodomes indicate a receptive endometrium for implantation.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/1/2
spellingShingle Terry Vera
Gayer Nalini
Adams Susan M
Murphy Christopher R
Manipulation of the follicular phase: Uterodomes and pregnancy - is there a correlation?
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
title Manipulation of the follicular phase: Uterodomes and pregnancy - is there a correlation?
title_full Manipulation of the follicular phase: Uterodomes and pregnancy - is there a correlation?
title_fullStr Manipulation of the follicular phase: Uterodomes and pregnancy - is there a correlation?
title_full_unstemmed Manipulation of the follicular phase: Uterodomes and pregnancy - is there a correlation?
title_short Manipulation of the follicular phase: Uterodomes and pregnancy - is there a correlation?
title_sort manipulation of the follicular phase uterodomes and pregnancy is there a correlation
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/1/2
work_keys_str_mv AT terryvera manipulationofthefollicularphaseuterodomesandpregnancyisthereacorrelation
AT gayernalini manipulationofthefollicularphaseuterodomesandpregnancyisthereacorrelation
AT adamssusanm manipulationofthefollicularphaseuterodomesandpregnancyisthereacorrelation
AT murphychristopherr manipulationofthefollicularphaseuterodomesandpregnancyisthereacorrelation