Brief communication: Surface energy balance differences over Greenland between ERA5 and ERA-Interim
<p>We compare the main atmospheric drivers of the melt season over the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) in ERA5 and ERA-Interim (ERAI) in their overlapping period 1979–2018. In summer, ERA5 differs significantly from ERAI, especially in the melt regions. Small-scale ERA5 <span class="inline-...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2023-12-01
|
Series: | The Cryosphere |
Online Access: | https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/5131/2023/tc-17-5131-2023.pdf |
_version_ | 1797403596812189696 |
---|---|
author | U. Krebs-Kanzow C. B. Rodehacke C. B. Rodehacke G. Lohmann G. Lohmann |
author_facet | U. Krebs-Kanzow C. B. Rodehacke C. B. Rodehacke G. Lohmann G. Lohmann |
author_sort | U. Krebs-Kanzow |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>We compare the main atmospheric drivers of the melt season over the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) in ERA5 and ERA-Interim (ERAI) in their overlapping period 1979–2018. In summer, ERA5 differs significantly from ERAI, especially in the melt regions. Small-scale ERA5 <span class="inline-formula">−</span> ERAI differences near the ice sheet's margins and over steep slopes can be explained by the different resolution, while the large-scale differences indicate a different representation of physical processes in the two reanalyses: averaged over the lower parts of the GrIS, the mean near-surface air temperature is 1 K lower, while the mean downward shortwave radiation at the surface is on average 15 <span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span> higher than in ERAI. Comparison with observational weather station data shows a significant warm bias in ERAI and, for ERA5, a significant positive bias in downward shortwave radiation. Consequently, methods that previously estimated the GrIS surface mass balance from the ERAI surface energy balance need to be carefully recalibrated before converting to ERA5 forcing.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:40:47Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d72f79ea6b6f4813bf070970bf80aaad |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1994-0416 1994-0424 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:40:47Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | Copernicus Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | The Cryosphere |
spelling | doaj.art-d72f79ea6b6f4813bf070970bf80aaad2023-12-06T06:09:50ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242023-12-01175131513610.5194/tc-17-5131-2023Brief communication: Surface energy balance differences over Greenland between ERA5 and ERA-InterimU. Krebs-Kanzow0C. B. Rodehacke1C. B. Rodehacke2G. Lohmann3G. Lohmann4Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, GermanyAlfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, GermanyDanish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, DenmarkAlfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, GermanyDepartment of Environmental Physics and MARUM, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany<p>We compare the main atmospheric drivers of the melt season over the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) in ERA5 and ERA-Interim (ERAI) in their overlapping period 1979–2018. In summer, ERA5 differs significantly from ERAI, especially in the melt regions. Small-scale ERA5 <span class="inline-formula">−</span> ERAI differences near the ice sheet's margins and over steep slopes can be explained by the different resolution, while the large-scale differences indicate a different representation of physical processes in the two reanalyses: averaged over the lower parts of the GrIS, the mean near-surface air temperature is 1 K lower, while the mean downward shortwave radiation at the surface is on average 15 <span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span> higher than in ERAI. Comparison with observational weather station data shows a significant warm bias in ERAI and, for ERA5, a significant positive bias in downward shortwave radiation. Consequently, methods that previously estimated the GrIS surface mass balance from the ERAI surface energy balance need to be carefully recalibrated before converting to ERA5 forcing.</p>https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/5131/2023/tc-17-5131-2023.pdf |
spellingShingle | U. Krebs-Kanzow C. B. Rodehacke C. B. Rodehacke G. Lohmann G. Lohmann Brief communication: Surface energy balance differences over Greenland between ERA5 and ERA-Interim The Cryosphere |
title | Brief communication: Surface energy balance differences over Greenland between ERA5 and ERA-Interim |
title_full | Brief communication: Surface energy balance differences over Greenland between ERA5 and ERA-Interim |
title_fullStr | Brief communication: Surface energy balance differences over Greenland between ERA5 and ERA-Interim |
title_full_unstemmed | Brief communication: Surface energy balance differences over Greenland between ERA5 and ERA-Interim |
title_short | Brief communication: Surface energy balance differences over Greenland between ERA5 and ERA-Interim |
title_sort | brief communication surface energy balance differences over greenland between era5 and era interim |
url | https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/5131/2023/tc-17-5131-2023.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ukrebskanzow briefcommunicationsurfaceenergybalancedifferencesovergreenlandbetweenera5anderainterim AT cbrodehacke briefcommunicationsurfaceenergybalancedifferencesovergreenlandbetweenera5anderainterim AT cbrodehacke briefcommunicationsurfaceenergybalancedifferencesovergreenlandbetweenera5anderainterim AT glohmann briefcommunicationsurfaceenergybalancedifferencesovergreenlandbetweenera5anderainterim AT glohmann briefcommunicationsurfaceenergybalancedifferencesovergreenlandbetweenera5anderainterim |