Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT Several clinicians use ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) to treat bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), although no conclusive data support this practice. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in the treatment of CRE bacteremia. PubM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yan Chen, Hui-Bin Huang, Jin-Min Peng, Li Weng, Bin Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Microbiology 2022-04-01
Series:Microbiology Spectrum
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.02603-21
_version_ 1818141899913953280
author Yan Chen
Hui-Bin Huang
Jin-Min Peng
Li Weng
Bin Du
author_facet Yan Chen
Hui-Bin Huang
Jin-Min Peng
Li Weng
Bin Du
author_sort Yan Chen
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Several clinicians use ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) to treat bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), although no conclusive data support this practice. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in the treatment of CRE bacteremia. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched until 5 November 2021. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of CAZ-AVI with other regimens in CRE BSI were included if they reported data on mortality. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Eleven articles with 1,205 patients were included. CAZ-AVI groups showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality than control groups of other regimens (RR = 0.55, 95% CI of 0.45 to 0.68, P < 0.00001). The result is robust when a colistin-based regimen serves as the control group (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 of 0.69, P < 0.0001). In subgroup meta-analyses, the 30-day mortality was significantly lower in patients infected with CRE producing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (RR = 0.59, 95% CI of 0.46 to 0.75, P < 0.0001). Additionally, patients in CAZ-AVI groups had a significantly higher clinical cure rate (RR = 1.75, 95% CI of 1.57 to 2.18, P < 0.00001) and lower nephrotoxicity rate (RR = 0.41, 95% CI of 0.20 to 0.84, P = 0.02). No significant differences of relapse rates were demonstrated in 2 groups (RR = 0.69, 95% CI of 0.29 to 1.66, P = 0.41). Although the current study is based on observational studies with a small sample of participants, the findings suggest that CAZ-AVI treatment is effective and safe compared with other antibiotics, including colistin, in CRE BSI. IMPORTANCE Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has been used as a frontline agent in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain unclear. Patients with CRE BSIs were often enrolled in small-sized clinical studies, together with other sites of infections, which reported pooled results. In this meta-analysis, the efficacy and safety were compared between CAZ-AVI and any other regimens used against CRE infections. The findings suggest that patients in the CAZ-AVI group had a significantly lower 30-day mortality than any other regimens and than colistin-based regimens. This paper provides a rationale for the use of CAZ-AVI in one of the most urgent antimicrobial-resistant infections of CRE bloodstream infections.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T11:07:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d734aa71c31f465fa66eb29fa88f7222
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2165-0497
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T11:07:13Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format Article
series Microbiology Spectrum
spelling doaj.art-d734aa71c31f465fa66eb29fa88f72222022-12-22T01:09:40ZengAmerican Society for MicrobiologyMicrobiology Spectrum2165-04972022-04-0110210.1128/spectrum.02603-21Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisYan Chen0Hui-Bin Huang1Jin-Min Peng2Li Weng3Bin Du4Medical Intensive Care Unit, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, ChinaMedical Intensive Care Unit, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, ChinaMedical Intensive Care Unit, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, ChinaMedical Intensive Care Unit, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, ChinaABSTRACT Several clinicians use ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) to treat bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), although no conclusive data support this practice. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in the treatment of CRE bacteremia. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched until 5 November 2021. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of CAZ-AVI with other regimens in CRE BSI were included if they reported data on mortality. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Eleven articles with 1,205 patients were included. CAZ-AVI groups showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality than control groups of other regimens (RR = 0.55, 95% CI of 0.45 to 0.68, P < 0.00001). The result is robust when a colistin-based regimen serves as the control group (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 of 0.69, P < 0.0001). In subgroup meta-analyses, the 30-day mortality was significantly lower in patients infected with CRE producing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (RR = 0.59, 95% CI of 0.46 to 0.75, P < 0.0001). Additionally, patients in CAZ-AVI groups had a significantly higher clinical cure rate (RR = 1.75, 95% CI of 1.57 to 2.18, P < 0.00001) and lower nephrotoxicity rate (RR = 0.41, 95% CI of 0.20 to 0.84, P = 0.02). No significant differences of relapse rates were demonstrated in 2 groups (RR = 0.69, 95% CI of 0.29 to 1.66, P = 0.41). Although the current study is based on observational studies with a small sample of participants, the findings suggest that CAZ-AVI treatment is effective and safe compared with other antibiotics, including colistin, in CRE BSI. IMPORTANCE Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has been used as a frontline agent in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain unclear. Patients with CRE BSIs were often enrolled in small-sized clinical studies, together with other sites of infections, which reported pooled results. In this meta-analysis, the efficacy and safety were compared between CAZ-AVI and any other regimens used against CRE infections. The findings suggest that patients in the CAZ-AVI group had a significantly lower 30-day mortality than any other regimens and than colistin-based regimens. This paper provides a rationale for the use of CAZ-AVI in one of the most urgent antimicrobial-resistant infections of CRE bloodstream infections.https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.02603-21ceftazidime-avibactamcarbapenem-resistant Enterobacteralesbloodstream infection
spellingShingle Yan Chen
Hui-Bin Huang
Jin-Min Peng
Li Weng
Bin Du
Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Microbiology Spectrum
ceftazidime-avibactam
carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales
bloodstream infection
title Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of ceftazidime avibactam for the treatment of carbapenem resistant enterobacterales bloodstream infection a systematic review and meta analysis
topic ceftazidime-avibactam
carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales
bloodstream infection
url https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.02603-21
work_keys_str_mv AT yanchen efficacyandsafetyofceftazidimeavibactamforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huibinhuang efficacyandsafetyofceftazidimeavibactamforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinminpeng efficacyandsafetyofceftazidimeavibactamforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liweng efficacyandsafetyofceftazidimeavibactamforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bindu efficacyandsafetyofceftazidimeavibactamforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis