Processing spatial configurations in visuospatial working memory is influenced by shifts of overt visual attention.

When memorizing multiple objects, humans process them in relation to each other, proposing a configuration benefit. Shifts in overt visual attention through eye movements might influence the processing of spatial configurations. Whereas some research suggests that overt visual attention aids the pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J David Timm, Frank Papenmeier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281445
_version_ 1797924673422360576
author J David Timm
Frank Papenmeier
author_facet J David Timm
Frank Papenmeier
author_sort J David Timm
collection DOAJ
description When memorizing multiple objects, humans process them in relation to each other, proposing a configuration benefit. Shifts in overt visual attention through eye movements might influence the processing of spatial configurations. Whereas some research suggests that overt visual attention aids the processing of spatial representations, other research suggests a snapshot-like processing of spatial configurations, thus likely not relying on eye movements. In the first experiment, we focused on the comparison between an enforced fixation and a free view condition regarding configurational effects. Participants encoded objects' locations and were asked for changes at retrieval. One object was displaced in half of the trials and was either accompanied by a configuration or was displayed alone. In the second experiment, we expanded this idea by enforcing fixation during different task phases, namely encoding, maintenance and retrieval. We investigated if a fixed gaze during one specific phase drives the influence of eye movements when processing spatial configurations. We observed reliable configuration benefits for the free view conditions. Whereas a fixed gaze throughout the whole trial reduced the effect, enforced fixations during the task phases did not break the configuration benefit. Our findings suggest that whereas the processing of spatial configurations in memory is supported by the ability of performing shifts of overt visual attention, configurational processing does not rely on these shifts occurring throughout the task. Our results indicate a reciprocal relationship of visuospatial working memory and eye movements.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T15:05:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d755580922cb4f1689c35bb854f1cede
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T15:05:47Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-d755580922cb4f1689c35bb854f1cede2023-02-15T05:31:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01182e028144510.1371/journal.pone.0281445Processing spatial configurations in visuospatial working memory is influenced by shifts of overt visual attention.J David TimmFrank PapenmeierWhen memorizing multiple objects, humans process them in relation to each other, proposing a configuration benefit. Shifts in overt visual attention through eye movements might influence the processing of spatial configurations. Whereas some research suggests that overt visual attention aids the processing of spatial representations, other research suggests a snapshot-like processing of spatial configurations, thus likely not relying on eye movements. In the first experiment, we focused on the comparison between an enforced fixation and a free view condition regarding configurational effects. Participants encoded objects' locations and were asked for changes at retrieval. One object was displaced in half of the trials and was either accompanied by a configuration or was displayed alone. In the second experiment, we expanded this idea by enforcing fixation during different task phases, namely encoding, maintenance and retrieval. We investigated if a fixed gaze during one specific phase drives the influence of eye movements when processing spatial configurations. We observed reliable configuration benefits for the free view conditions. Whereas a fixed gaze throughout the whole trial reduced the effect, enforced fixations during the task phases did not break the configuration benefit. Our findings suggest that whereas the processing of spatial configurations in memory is supported by the ability of performing shifts of overt visual attention, configurational processing does not rely on these shifts occurring throughout the task. Our results indicate a reciprocal relationship of visuospatial working memory and eye movements.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281445
spellingShingle J David Timm
Frank Papenmeier
Processing spatial configurations in visuospatial working memory is influenced by shifts of overt visual attention.
PLoS ONE
title Processing spatial configurations in visuospatial working memory is influenced by shifts of overt visual attention.
title_full Processing spatial configurations in visuospatial working memory is influenced by shifts of overt visual attention.
title_fullStr Processing spatial configurations in visuospatial working memory is influenced by shifts of overt visual attention.
title_full_unstemmed Processing spatial configurations in visuospatial working memory is influenced by shifts of overt visual attention.
title_short Processing spatial configurations in visuospatial working memory is influenced by shifts of overt visual attention.
title_sort processing spatial configurations in visuospatial working memory is influenced by shifts of overt visual attention
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281445
work_keys_str_mv AT jdavidtimm processingspatialconfigurationsinvisuospatialworkingmemoryisinfluencedbyshiftsofovertvisualattention
AT frankpapenmeier processingspatialconfigurationsinvisuospatialworkingmemoryisinfluencedbyshiftsofovertvisualattention