Manipulations of word frequency reveal differences in the processing of morphologically complex and simple words in German

We tested current models of morphological processing in reading with data from four visual lexical decision experiments using German compounds and monomorphemic words. Triplets of two semantically transparent noun-noun compounds and one monomorphemic noun were used in Experiments 1a and 1b. Stimuli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria eBronk, Pienie eZwitserlood, Jens eBölte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00546/full
_version_ 1811329796104257536
author Maria eBronk
Pienie eZwitserlood
Jens eBölte
author_facet Maria eBronk
Pienie eZwitserlood
Jens eBölte
author_sort Maria eBronk
collection DOAJ
description We tested current models of morphological processing in reading with data from four visual lexical decision experiments using German compounds and monomorphemic words. Triplets of two semantically transparent noun-noun compounds and one monomorphemic noun were used in Experiments 1a and 1b. Stimuli within a triplet were matched for full-form frequency. The frequency of the compounds’ constituents was varied. The compounds of a triplet shared one constituent, while the frequency of the unshared constituent was either high or low, but always higher than full-form frequency. Reactions were faster to compounds with high-frequency constituents than to compounds with low-frequency constituents, while the latter did not differ from the monomorphemic words. This pattern was not influenced by task difficulty, induced by the type of pseudocompounds used. Pseudocompounds were either created by altering letters of an existing compound (easy pseudocompound, Experiment 1a) or by combining two free morphemes into a non-existing, but morphologically legal, compound (difficult pseudocompound, Experiment 1b). In Experiment 2a and 2b, frequency-matched pairs of semantically opaque noun-noun compounds and simple nouns were tested. In Experiment 2a, with easy pseudocompounds (of the same type as in Experiment 1a), a reaction-time advantage for compounds over monomorphemic words was again observed. This advantage disappeared in Experiment 2b, where difficult pseudocompounds were used. Although a dual-route might account for the data, the findings are best understood in terms of decomposition of low-frequency complex words prior to lexical access, followed by processing costs due to the recombination of morphemes for meaning access. These processing costs vary as a function of intrinsic factors such as semantic transparency, or external factors such as the difficulty of the experimental task.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T15:50:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d756ae52dc1547788d42d22966fbd12e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T15:50:11Z
publishDate 2013-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-d756ae52dc1547788d42d22966fbd12e2022-12-22T02:40:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782013-08-01410.3389/fpsyg.2013.0054656357Manipulations of word frequency reveal differences in the processing of morphologically complex and simple words in GermanMaria eBronk0Pienie eZwitserlood1Jens eBölte2Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterWe tested current models of morphological processing in reading with data from four visual lexical decision experiments using German compounds and monomorphemic words. Triplets of two semantically transparent noun-noun compounds and one monomorphemic noun were used in Experiments 1a and 1b. Stimuli within a triplet were matched for full-form frequency. The frequency of the compounds’ constituents was varied. The compounds of a triplet shared one constituent, while the frequency of the unshared constituent was either high or low, but always higher than full-form frequency. Reactions were faster to compounds with high-frequency constituents than to compounds with low-frequency constituents, while the latter did not differ from the monomorphemic words. This pattern was not influenced by task difficulty, induced by the type of pseudocompounds used. Pseudocompounds were either created by altering letters of an existing compound (easy pseudocompound, Experiment 1a) or by combining two free morphemes into a non-existing, but morphologically legal, compound (difficult pseudocompound, Experiment 1b). In Experiment 2a and 2b, frequency-matched pairs of semantically opaque noun-noun compounds and simple nouns were tested. In Experiment 2a, with easy pseudocompounds (of the same type as in Experiment 1a), a reaction-time advantage for compounds over monomorphemic words was again observed. This advantage disappeared in Experiment 2b, where difficult pseudocompounds were used. Although a dual-route might account for the data, the findings are best understood in terms of decomposition of low-frequency complex words prior to lexical access, followed by processing costs due to the recombination of morphemes for meaning access. These processing costs vary as a function of intrinsic factors such as semantic transparency, or external factors such as the difficulty of the experimental task.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00546/fullmorphologyGermanlexical decisionword frequencycompound processing
spellingShingle Maria eBronk
Pienie eZwitserlood
Jens eBölte
Manipulations of word frequency reveal differences in the processing of morphologically complex and simple words in German
Frontiers in Psychology
morphology
German
lexical decision
word frequency
compound processing
title Manipulations of word frequency reveal differences in the processing of morphologically complex and simple words in German
title_full Manipulations of word frequency reveal differences in the processing of morphologically complex and simple words in German
title_fullStr Manipulations of word frequency reveal differences in the processing of morphologically complex and simple words in German
title_full_unstemmed Manipulations of word frequency reveal differences in the processing of morphologically complex and simple words in German
title_short Manipulations of word frequency reveal differences in the processing of morphologically complex and simple words in German
title_sort manipulations of word frequency reveal differences in the processing of morphologically complex and simple words in german
topic morphology
German
lexical decision
word frequency
compound processing
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00546/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mariaebronk manipulationsofwordfrequencyrevealdifferencesintheprocessingofmorphologicallycomplexandsimplewordsingerman
AT pienieezwitserlood manipulationsofwordfrequencyrevealdifferencesintheprocessingofmorphologicallycomplexandsimplewordsingerman
AT jensebolte manipulationsofwordfrequencyrevealdifferencesintheprocessingofmorphologicallycomplexandsimplewordsingerman