Influence of early colorectal cancer component on the positive margins after endoscopic resection: a retrospective study

Abstract Background Endoscopic treatment methods for early colorectal cancer (ECRC) mainly depend on the size and morphology. It is unclear whether different endoscopic resection methods could achieve curative resection for ECRC confined in the mucosa. The study was designed to compare the rate of p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qing-Wei Zhang, Zi-Hao Dai, Xiao-Yi Wang, Yun-Jie Gao, Zhi-Zheng Ge, Xiao-Bo Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-01-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09159-8
_version_ 1819280859699609600
author Qing-Wei Zhang
Zi-Hao Dai
Xiao-Yi Wang
Yun-Jie Gao
Zhi-Zheng Ge
Xiao-Bo Li
author_facet Qing-Wei Zhang
Zi-Hao Dai
Xiao-Yi Wang
Yun-Jie Gao
Zhi-Zheng Ge
Xiao-Bo Li
author_sort Qing-Wei Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Endoscopic treatment methods for early colorectal cancer (ECRC) mainly depend on the size and morphology. It is unclear whether different endoscopic resection methods could achieve curative resection for ECRC confined in the mucosa. The study was designed to compare the rate of positive vertical margin (VM) of ECRC with advanced adenomas (AAs) including adenoma > 1 cm, villous adenoma, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia/dysplasia stratified by different endoscopic resection methods. Methods Rate of positive VM for 489 ECRCs including Intramucosal (pTis) and superficial submucosal invasion (pT1) carcinomas were compared with those of 753 AAs stratified by different endoscopic resection methods using Chi-squared test. Multivariate logistic model was performed to investigate the risk factors of positive VM for different endoscopic resection methods. Results The pTis ECRC exhibited a similar rate of positive VM as that of AAs for en bloc hot snare polypectomy (HSP, 0% Vs. 0.85%, P = 0.617), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR, 0.81% vs. 0.25%, P = 0.375) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD, 1.82% Vs. 1.02%, P = 0.659). The pTis carcinoma was not found to be a risk factor for positive VM by en bloc EMR (P = 0.349) or ESD (P = 0.368). The en bloc resection achieved for pT1a carcinomas exhibited similar to positive VM achieved through ESD (2.06% Vs. 1.02%, P = 1.000) for AAs. Nonetheless, EMR resulted in higher risk of positive VM (5.41% Vs. 0.25%, P < 0.001) for pT1a carcinomas as compared to AAs. The pT1a invasion was identified as a risk factor for positive VM in polyps with en bloc EMR (odds ratio = 23.90, P = 0.005) but not ESD (OR = 2.96, P = 0.396). Conclusion Collectively, the pTis carcinoma was not found to be a risk factor for positive VM resected by en bloc HSP, EMR or ESD. Additionally, ESD may be preferred over EMR for pT1a carcinomas with lower rate of positive VM.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T00:50:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d77001b8396c495abcf2b7087eb3f223
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T00:50:30Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj.art-d77001b8396c495abcf2b7087eb3f2232022-12-21T17:23:36ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072022-01-012211710.1186/s12885-021-09159-8Influence of early colorectal cancer component on the positive margins after endoscopic resection: a retrospective studyQing-Wei Zhang0Zi-Hao Dai1Xiao-Yi Wang2Yun-Jie Gao3Zhi-Zheng Ge4Xiao-Bo Li5Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive DiseaseDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive DiseaseDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive DiseaseDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive DiseaseDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive DiseaseDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ministry of Health, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Digestive DiseaseAbstract Background Endoscopic treatment methods for early colorectal cancer (ECRC) mainly depend on the size and morphology. It is unclear whether different endoscopic resection methods could achieve curative resection for ECRC confined in the mucosa. The study was designed to compare the rate of positive vertical margin (VM) of ECRC with advanced adenomas (AAs) including adenoma > 1 cm, villous adenoma, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia/dysplasia stratified by different endoscopic resection methods. Methods Rate of positive VM for 489 ECRCs including Intramucosal (pTis) and superficial submucosal invasion (pT1) carcinomas were compared with those of 753 AAs stratified by different endoscopic resection methods using Chi-squared test. Multivariate logistic model was performed to investigate the risk factors of positive VM for different endoscopic resection methods. Results The pTis ECRC exhibited a similar rate of positive VM as that of AAs for en bloc hot snare polypectomy (HSP, 0% Vs. 0.85%, P = 0.617), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR, 0.81% vs. 0.25%, P = 0.375) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD, 1.82% Vs. 1.02%, P = 0.659). The pTis carcinoma was not found to be a risk factor for positive VM by en bloc EMR (P = 0.349) or ESD (P = 0.368). The en bloc resection achieved for pT1a carcinomas exhibited similar to positive VM achieved through ESD (2.06% Vs. 1.02%, P = 1.000) for AAs. Nonetheless, EMR resulted in higher risk of positive VM (5.41% Vs. 0.25%, P < 0.001) for pT1a carcinomas as compared to AAs. The pT1a invasion was identified as a risk factor for positive VM in polyps with en bloc EMR (odds ratio = 23.90, P = 0.005) but not ESD (OR = 2.96, P = 0.396). Conclusion Collectively, the pTis carcinoma was not found to be a risk factor for positive VM resected by en bloc HSP, EMR or ESD. Additionally, ESD may be preferred over EMR for pT1a carcinomas with lower rate of positive VM.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09159-8Early colorectal cancerEndoscopic submucosal dissectionEndoscopic mucosal resectionHot snare polypectomyVertical margin
spellingShingle Qing-Wei Zhang
Zi-Hao Dai
Xiao-Yi Wang
Yun-Jie Gao
Zhi-Zheng Ge
Xiao-Bo Li
Influence of early colorectal cancer component on the positive margins after endoscopic resection: a retrospective study
BMC Cancer
Early colorectal cancer
Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Hot snare polypectomy
Vertical margin
title Influence of early colorectal cancer component on the positive margins after endoscopic resection: a retrospective study
title_full Influence of early colorectal cancer component on the positive margins after endoscopic resection: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Influence of early colorectal cancer component on the positive margins after endoscopic resection: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of early colorectal cancer component on the positive margins after endoscopic resection: a retrospective study
title_short Influence of early colorectal cancer component on the positive margins after endoscopic resection: a retrospective study
title_sort influence of early colorectal cancer component on the positive margins after endoscopic resection a retrospective study
topic Early colorectal cancer
Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Hot snare polypectomy
Vertical margin
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09159-8
work_keys_str_mv AT qingweizhang influenceofearlycolorectalcancercomponentonthepositivemarginsafterendoscopicresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT zihaodai influenceofearlycolorectalcancercomponentonthepositivemarginsafterendoscopicresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT xiaoyiwang influenceofearlycolorectalcancercomponentonthepositivemarginsafterendoscopicresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT yunjiegao influenceofearlycolorectalcancercomponentonthepositivemarginsafterendoscopicresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT zhizhengge influenceofearlycolorectalcancercomponentonthepositivemarginsafterendoscopicresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT xiaoboli influenceofearlycolorectalcancercomponentonthepositivemarginsafterendoscopicresectionaretrospectivestudy