Do anthropogenic, continental or coastal aerosol sources impact on a marine aerosol signature at Mace Head?

Atmospheric aerosols have been sampled and characterised at the Mace Head north-east (NE) Atlantic atmospheric research station since 1958, with many interesting phenomena being discovered. However, with the range of new discoveries and scientific advances, there has been a range of concomitant crit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. O'Dowd, D. Ceburnis, J. Ovadnevaite, A. Vaishya, M. Rinaldi, M. C. Facchini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-10-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/10687/2014/acp-14-10687-2014.pdf
_version_ 1828155579965636608
author C. O'Dowd
D. Ceburnis
J. Ovadnevaite
A. Vaishya
M. Rinaldi
M. C. Facchini
author_facet C. O'Dowd
D. Ceburnis
J. Ovadnevaite
A. Vaishya
M. Rinaldi
M. C. Facchini
author_sort C. O'Dowd
collection DOAJ
description Atmospheric aerosols have been sampled and characterised at the Mace Head north-east (NE) Atlantic atmospheric research station since 1958, with many interesting phenomena being discovered. However, with the range of new discoveries and scientific advances, there has been a range of concomitant criticisms challenging the representativeness of aerosol sampled at the station compared to that of aerosol over the pristine open-ocean. Two recurring criticisms relate to the lack of representativeness due to potentially enhanced coastal sources, possibly leading to artificially high values of aerosol concentrations, and to the influence of long-range transport of anthropogenic or continental aerosol and its potential dominance over, or perturbation of, a natural marine aerosol signal. Here, we review the results of previous experimental studies on marine aerosols over the NE Atlantic and at Mace Head with the aim of evaluating their representativeness relative to that of a pristine open-ocean aerosol, i.e. with negligible anthropogenic/continental influence. Particular focus is given to submicron organic matter (OM) aerosol. In summary, no correlation was found between OM and black carbon (BC) in marine air conforming to clean-air sampling criteria, either at BC levels of 0–15 or 15–50 ng m<sup>−3</sup>, suggesting that OM concentrations, up to observed peak values of 3.8 μg m<sup>−3</sup>, are predominantly natural in origin. Sophisticated carbon isotope analysis and aerosol mass spectral finger printing techniques corroborate the conclusion that there is a predominant natural source of OM, with 80% biogenic source apportionment being observed for general clean-air conditions, rising to &sim;98% during specific primary marine organic plumes when peak OM mass concentrations > 3 μg m<sup>−3</sup> are observed. Similarly, a maximum contribution of 20% OM mass coming from non-marine sources was established by dual carbon isotope analysis. Further, analysis of a series of experiments conducted at Mace Head conclude that negligible coastal, surf zone, or tidal effects are discernible in the secondary or primary aerosol mass residing in the submicron size range for sampling heights of 7 m and above. The Mace Head marine-air criteria ensure anthropogenic and coastal effects are sufficiently minimised so as to guarantee a predominant, and sometimes overwhelming, natural marine aerosol contribution to the total aerosol population when the criteria are adhered to.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T22:55:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d772e20d81424d61853dca9f112d2fef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T22:55:50Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-d772e20d81424d61853dca9f112d2fef2022-12-22T03:58:25ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242014-10-011419106871070410.5194/acp-14-10687-2014Do anthropogenic, continental or coastal aerosol sources impact on a marine aerosol signature at Mace Head?C. O'Dowd0D. Ceburnis1J. Ovadnevaite2A. Vaishya3M. Rinaldi4M. C. Facchini5School of Physics and Centre for Climate and Air Pollution Studies, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, IrelandSchool of Physics and Centre for Climate and Air Pollution Studies, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, IrelandSchool of Physics and Centre for Climate and Air Pollution Studies, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, IrelandSchool of Physics and Centre for Climate and Air Pollution Studies, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, IrelandIstituto di Scienze dell'Atmosfera e del Clima, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bologna, ItalyIstituto di Scienze dell'Atmosfera e del Clima, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bologna, ItalyAtmospheric aerosols have been sampled and characterised at the Mace Head north-east (NE) Atlantic atmospheric research station since 1958, with many interesting phenomena being discovered. However, with the range of new discoveries and scientific advances, there has been a range of concomitant criticisms challenging the representativeness of aerosol sampled at the station compared to that of aerosol over the pristine open-ocean. Two recurring criticisms relate to the lack of representativeness due to potentially enhanced coastal sources, possibly leading to artificially high values of aerosol concentrations, and to the influence of long-range transport of anthropogenic or continental aerosol and its potential dominance over, or perturbation of, a natural marine aerosol signal. Here, we review the results of previous experimental studies on marine aerosols over the NE Atlantic and at Mace Head with the aim of evaluating their representativeness relative to that of a pristine open-ocean aerosol, i.e. with negligible anthropogenic/continental influence. Particular focus is given to submicron organic matter (OM) aerosol. In summary, no correlation was found between OM and black carbon (BC) in marine air conforming to clean-air sampling criteria, either at BC levels of 0–15 or 15–50 ng m<sup>−3</sup>, suggesting that OM concentrations, up to observed peak values of 3.8 μg m<sup>−3</sup>, are predominantly natural in origin. Sophisticated carbon isotope analysis and aerosol mass spectral finger printing techniques corroborate the conclusion that there is a predominant natural source of OM, with 80% biogenic source apportionment being observed for general clean-air conditions, rising to &sim;98% during specific primary marine organic plumes when peak OM mass concentrations > 3 μg m<sup>−3</sup> are observed. Similarly, a maximum contribution of 20% OM mass coming from non-marine sources was established by dual carbon isotope analysis. Further, analysis of a series of experiments conducted at Mace Head conclude that negligible coastal, surf zone, or tidal effects are discernible in the secondary or primary aerosol mass residing in the submicron size range for sampling heights of 7 m and above. The Mace Head marine-air criteria ensure anthropogenic and coastal effects are sufficiently minimised so as to guarantee a predominant, and sometimes overwhelming, natural marine aerosol contribution to the total aerosol population when the criteria are adhered to.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/10687/2014/acp-14-10687-2014.pdf
spellingShingle C. O'Dowd
D. Ceburnis
J. Ovadnevaite
A. Vaishya
M. Rinaldi
M. C. Facchini
Do anthropogenic, continental or coastal aerosol sources impact on a marine aerosol signature at Mace Head?
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Do anthropogenic, continental or coastal aerosol sources impact on a marine aerosol signature at Mace Head?
title_full Do anthropogenic, continental or coastal aerosol sources impact on a marine aerosol signature at Mace Head?
title_fullStr Do anthropogenic, continental or coastal aerosol sources impact on a marine aerosol signature at Mace Head?
title_full_unstemmed Do anthropogenic, continental or coastal aerosol sources impact on a marine aerosol signature at Mace Head?
title_short Do anthropogenic, continental or coastal aerosol sources impact on a marine aerosol signature at Mace Head?
title_sort do anthropogenic continental or coastal aerosol sources impact on a marine aerosol signature at mace head
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/10687/2014/acp-14-10687-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT codowd doanthropogeniccontinentalorcoastalaerosolsourcesimpactonamarineaerosolsignatureatmacehead
AT dceburnis doanthropogeniccontinentalorcoastalaerosolsourcesimpactonamarineaerosolsignatureatmacehead
AT jovadnevaite doanthropogeniccontinentalorcoastalaerosolsourcesimpactonamarineaerosolsignatureatmacehead
AT avaishya doanthropogeniccontinentalorcoastalaerosolsourcesimpactonamarineaerosolsignatureatmacehead
AT mrinaldi doanthropogeniccontinentalorcoastalaerosolsourcesimpactonamarineaerosolsignatureatmacehead
AT mcfacchini doanthropogeniccontinentalorcoastalaerosolsourcesimpactonamarineaerosolsignatureatmacehead