Quality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials - update and extension
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Non-inferiority and equivalence trials require tailored methodology and therefore adequate conduct and reporting is an ambitious task. The aim of our review was to assess whether the criteria recommended by the CONSORT extension were...
Main Authors: | Schiller Petra, Burchardi Nicole, Niestroj Michael, Kieser Meinhard |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-11-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/13/1/214 |
Similar Items
-
Appropriate design and reporting of superiority, equivalence and non-inferiority clinical trials incorporating a benefit–risk assessment: the BRAINS study including expert workshop
by: Nikki Totton, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
The reporting of methods for reducing and detecting bias: an example from the WHO Misoprostol Third Stage of Labour equivalence randomised controlled trial
by: Pinol Alain PY, et al.
Published: (2003-10-01) -
Reporting randomised trials of social and psychological interventions: the CONSORT-SPI 2018 Extension
by: Paul Montgomery, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Supraneural versus Infraneural Approach to transforaMinal Epidural StEroid injection for unilateral lumbosacral radicular pain (SIAMESE): a study protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial
by: Helen F. Galley, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Registry-based randomised controlled trials: conduct, advantages and challenges—a systematic review
by: Frances Shiely, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)