Autogenous self‐healing of concrete: Experimental design and test methodsA review

Abstract Cracks in concrete structures can serve as pathways for aggressive chemical substances that can lead to a progressive deterioration of the cement stone as well as of the reinforcement, affecting the load capacity, service life and useability of concrete structures. However, concrete and rei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Lahmann, Carola Edvardsen, Sylvia Kessler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Engineering Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12565
_version_ 1797965514121674752
author Daniel Lahmann
Carola Edvardsen
Sylvia Kessler
author_facet Daniel Lahmann
Carola Edvardsen
Sylvia Kessler
author_sort Daniel Lahmann
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Cracks in concrete structures can serve as pathways for aggressive chemical substances that can lead to a progressive deterioration of the cement stone as well as of the reinforcement, affecting the load capacity, service life and useability of concrete structures. However, concrete and reinforced concrete exhibit an intrinsic ability to heal cracks, defined as autogenous self‐healing. This effect includes the precipitation of calcium carbonate in the presence of water and CO2 and is accompanied by continued hydration, swelling, and mechanical blocking of the crack pathway. Experiments led to the inclusion of crack sealing by autogenous self‐healing in Eurocode 1992–3 for water retaining concrete structures. However, despite code restrictions, autogenous self‐healing of concrete shows limited effectiveness in practice. This indicates the need for further research to provide engineers with reliable design rules. Therefore, this study aims for giving a broad literature review on the state‐of‐the‐art knowledge on autogenous self‐healing, the boundary conditions, consensus, and controversy of processes and factors influencing the efficiency of autogenous self‐healing. Regarding the transferability of laboratory results to real concrete constructions, materials, crack initiation techniques, experimental concepts, and methods for assessing the effectiveness of autogenous self‐healing are discussed and recommendations for future experiments are set.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T02:00:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d7823522647944e3baf501503f47addd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2577-8196
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T02:00:05Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Engineering Reports
spelling doaj.art-d7823522647944e3baf501503f47addd2023-01-03T04:21:38ZengWileyEngineering Reports2577-81962023-01-0151n/an/a10.1002/eng2.12565Autogenous self‐healing of concrete: Experimental design and test methodsA reviewDaniel Lahmann0Carola Edvardsen1Sylvia Kessler2Institute of Engineering Materials and Building Preservation Helmut‐Schmidt‐University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg Hamburg GermanyCOWI Technical Director/Lead Durability Specialist Tunnels and Underground Infrastructure Kongens Lyngby DenmarkInstitute of Engineering Materials and Building Preservation Helmut‐Schmidt‐University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg Hamburg GermanyAbstract Cracks in concrete structures can serve as pathways for aggressive chemical substances that can lead to a progressive deterioration of the cement stone as well as of the reinforcement, affecting the load capacity, service life and useability of concrete structures. However, concrete and reinforced concrete exhibit an intrinsic ability to heal cracks, defined as autogenous self‐healing. This effect includes the precipitation of calcium carbonate in the presence of water and CO2 and is accompanied by continued hydration, swelling, and mechanical blocking of the crack pathway. Experiments led to the inclusion of crack sealing by autogenous self‐healing in Eurocode 1992–3 for water retaining concrete structures. However, despite code restrictions, autogenous self‐healing of concrete shows limited effectiveness in practice. This indicates the need for further research to provide engineers with reliable design rules. Therefore, this study aims for giving a broad literature review on the state‐of‐the‐art knowledge on autogenous self‐healing, the boundary conditions, consensus, and controversy of processes and factors influencing the efficiency of autogenous self‐healing. Regarding the transferability of laboratory results to real concrete constructions, materials, crack initiation techniques, experimental concepts, and methods for assessing the effectiveness of autogenous self‐healing are discussed and recommendations for future experiments are set.https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12565autogenous self‐healingconcreteexperimental designsinfluencing factors
spellingShingle Daniel Lahmann
Carola Edvardsen
Sylvia Kessler
Autogenous self‐healing of concrete: Experimental design and test methodsA review
Engineering Reports
autogenous self‐healing
concrete
experimental designs
influencing factors
title Autogenous self‐healing of concrete: Experimental design and test methodsA review
title_full Autogenous self‐healing of concrete: Experimental design and test methodsA review
title_fullStr Autogenous self‐healing of concrete: Experimental design and test methodsA review
title_full_unstemmed Autogenous self‐healing of concrete: Experimental design and test methodsA review
title_short Autogenous self‐healing of concrete: Experimental design and test methodsA review
title_sort autogenous self healing of concrete experimental design and test methodsa review
topic autogenous self‐healing
concrete
experimental designs
influencing factors
url https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12565
work_keys_str_mv AT daniellahmann autogenousselfhealingofconcreteexperimentaldesignandtestmethodsareview
AT carolaedvardsen autogenousselfhealingofconcreteexperimentaldesignandtestmethodsareview
AT sylviakessler autogenousselfhealingofconcreteexperimentaldesignandtestmethodsareview