Comparative evaluation of DES and SAS turbulence models for incompressible flow in a Venturi tube

Computational fluid dynamics employs the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and combines both models to perform a hybrid RANS/LES simulation of the transient state flow field, within which there are the Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) and Scale-Adaptive Simu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: San Luis TOLENTINO, Omar GONZÁLEZ, Jorge MÍREZ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli” - INCAS 2022-06-01
Series:INCAS Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bulletin.incas.ro/files/tolentino_gonzalez_mirez__vol_14_iss_2.pdf
_version_ 1818212141719617536
author San Luis TOLENTINO
Omar GONZÁLEZ
Jorge MÍREZ
author_facet San Luis TOLENTINO
Omar GONZÁLEZ
Jorge MÍREZ
author_sort San Luis TOLENTINO
collection DOAJ
description Computational fluid dynamics employs the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and combines both models to perform a hybrid RANS/LES simulation of the transient state flow field, within which there are the Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) and Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) models. In the present work, the objective is to evaluate the DES and SAS turbulence models for flow (water) in a Venturi tube, for 2D computational domains. The domain was discretized for grids with quadrilateral cells, and the flow field was studied for four flow rates. The results of the pressure flow field simulations for the DES and SAS models were compared with experimental data reported in the literature, which fit the experiments. However, the DES k-ε model presented a negative pressure drop for a region of the flow adjacent to the wall, at the entrance of the throat section, the other models DES S-A, DES SST k-ω and SAS presented positive pressures. The discharge coefficients yielded values in the range of 0.94-0.951, which were lower than the experiments, for errors in the range of 1.57-2.76%.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:43:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d78b1ae947fb42f2ba11a51572808d4d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2066-8201
2247-4528
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:43:41Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher National Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli” - INCAS
record_format Article
series INCAS Bulletin
spelling doaj.art-d78b1ae947fb42f2ba11a51572808d4d2022-12-22T00:35:51ZengNational Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli” - INCASINCAS Bulletin2066-82012247-45282022-06-011428710110.13111/2066-8201.2022.14.2.8Comparative evaluation of DES and SAS turbulence models for incompressible flow in a Venturi tubeSan Luis TOLENTINO0Omar GONZÁLEZ1Jorge MÍREZ2National Experimental Polytechnic University “AJS” Vice-Rectorate, Puerto Ordaz (UNEXPO), Bolívar, Venezuela, sanluist@gmail.comFaculty of Civil Engineering, National University Hermilio Valdizán (UNHEVAL), Huánuco, Perú, omargc17@gmail.comGroup of Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Simulation (GMMNS), Faculty of Oil, Natural Gas and Petrochemical Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería (UNI), Lima, Perú, jmirez@uni.edu.peComputational fluid dynamics employs the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and combines both models to perform a hybrid RANS/LES simulation of the transient state flow field, within which there are the Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) and Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) models. In the present work, the objective is to evaluate the DES and SAS turbulence models for flow (water) in a Venturi tube, for 2D computational domains. The domain was discretized for grids with quadrilateral cells, and the flow field was studied for four flow rates. The results of the pressure flow field simulations for the DES and SAS models were compared with experimental data reported in the literature, which fit the experiments. However, the DES k-ε model presented a negative pressure drop for a region of the flow adjacent to the wall, at the entrance of the throat section, the other models DES S-A, DES SST k-ω and SAS presented positive pressures. The discharge coefficients yielded values in the range of 0.94-0.951, which were lower than the experiments, for errors in the range of 1.57-2.76%.https://bulletin.incas.ro/files/tolentino_gonzalez_mirez__vol_14_iss_2.pdfdischarge coefficientincompressible flowdes and sas modelspressurerans/les hybrid simulationventuri tube
spellingShingle San Luis TOLENTINO
Omar GONZÁLEZ
Jorge MÍREZ
Comparative evaluation of DES and SAS turbulence models for incompressible flow in a Venturi tube
INCAS Bulletin
discharge coefficient
incompressible flow
des and sas models
pressure
rans/les hybrid simulation
venturi tube
title Comparative evaluation of DES and SAS turbulence models for incompressible flow in a Venturi tube
title_full Comparative evaluation of DES and SAS turbulence models for incompressible flow in a Venturi tube
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of DES and SAS turbulence models for incompressible flow in a Venturi tube
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of DES and SAS turbulence models for incompressible flow in a Venturi tube
title_short Comparative evaluation of DES and SAS turbulence models for incompressible flow in a Venturi tube
title_sort comparative evaluation of des and sas turbulence models for incompressible flow in a venturi tube
topic discharge coefficient
incompressible flow
des and sas models
pressure
rans/les hybrid simulation
venturi tube
url https://bulletin.incas.ro/files/tolentino_gonzalez_mirez__vol_14_iss_2.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sanluistolentino comparativeevaluationofdesandsasturbulencemodelsforincompressibleflowinaventuritube
AT omargonzalez comparativeevaluationofdesandsasturbulencemodelsforincompressibleflowinaventuritube
AT jorgemirez comparativeevaluationofdesandsasturbulencemodelsforincompressibleflowinaventuritube