Biogeographical variation in diurnal behaviour of Acanthaster planci versus Acanthaster cf. solaris.
Crown-of-thorns starfish (CoTS; Acanthaster spp.) are among the most extensively studied coral reef taxa, largely owing to their devastating impacts on live coral cover during population outbreaks. Much of this research has however, been conducted in the western Pacific, although it is now apparent...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228796 |
| _version_ | 1818824278071574528 |
|---|---|
| author | Deborah Burn Samuel Matthews Ciemon F Caballes Josie F Chandler Morgan S Pratchett |
| author_facet | Deborah Burn Samuel Matthews Ciemon F Caballes Josie F Chandler Morgan S Pratchett |
| author_sort | Deborah Burn |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Crown-of-thorns starfish (CoTS; Acanthaster spp.) are among the most extensively studied coral reef taxa, largely owing to their devastating impacts on live coral cover during population outbreaks. Much of this research has however, been conducted in the western Pacific, although it is now apparent that there are several distinct species of Acanthaster spp. across the Indo-Pacific. The purpose of this study was to test for biogeographical variation in behaviour, comparing between Acanthaster planci at Lankanfushi Island in the Maldives and Acanthaster cf. solaris at Rib Reef on Australia's Great Barrier Reef. The extent to which CoTS were exposed (cf. concealed within or beneath coral substrates) was substantially higher (63.14%) for A. planci at Lankanfushi Island, compared to 28.55% for A. cf. solaris at Rib Reef, regardless of time of day. More importantly, only 52% of individuals were exposed at night at Rib Reef compared to >97% at reefs around Lankanfushi Island. Biogeographic variation in the behaviour of Acanthaster spp. was independent of differences in the size structure of starfish and coral cover at specific study sites, but may be attributable to other environmental factors such as habitat complexity or prey availability. This is the first study to explicitly test for biogeographical differences in the biology and behaviour of Acanthaster spp., potentially linked to species-specific differences in the causes and explanations of population outbreaks. However, we did not find evidence at this stage of differences in behavior among regions, rather behavioural differences observed were most likely products of different environments. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-18T23:53:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d7966563090b42e9b5c2aed17d090c71 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-18T23:53:20Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-d7966563090b42e9b5c2aed17d090c712022-12-21T20:46:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01152e022879610.1371/journal.pone.0228796Biogeographical variation in diurnal behaviour of Acanthaster planci versus Acanthaster cf. solaris.Deborah BurnSamuel MatthewsCiemon F CaballesJosie F ChandlerMorgan S PratchettCrown-of-thorns starfish (CoTS; Acanthaster spp.) are among the most extensively studied coral reef taxa, largely owing to their devastating impacts on live coral cover during population outbreaks. Much of this research has however, been conducted in the western Pacific, although it is now apparent that there are several distinct species of Acanthaster spp. across the Indo-Pacific. The purpose of this study was to test for biogeographical variation in behaviour, comparing between Acanthaster planci at Lankanfushi Island in the Maldives and Acanthaster cf. solaris at Rib Reef on Australia's Great Barrier Reef. The extent to which CoTS were exposed (cf. concealed within or beneath coral substrates) was substantially higher (63.14%) for A. planci at Lankanfushi Island, compared to 28.55% for A. cf. solaris at Rib Reef, regardless of time of day. More importantly, only 52% of individuals were exposed at night at Rib Reef compared to >97% at reefs around Lankanfushi Island. Biogeographic variation in the behaviour of Acanthaster spp. was independent of differences in the size structure of starfish and coral cover at specific study sites, but may be attributable to other environmental factors such as habitat complexity or prey availability. This is the first study to explicitly test for biogeographical differences in the biology and behaviour of Acanthaster spp., potentially linked to species-specific differences in the causes and explanations of population outbreaks. However, we did not find evidence at this stage of differences in behavior among regions, rather behavioural differences observed were most likely products of different environments.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228796 |
| spellingShingle | Deborah Burn Samuel Matthews Ciemon F Caballes Josie F Chandler Morgan S Pratchett Biogeographical variation in diurnal behaviour of Acanthaster planci versus Acanthaster cf. solaris. PLoS ONE |
| title | Biogeographical variation in diurnal behaviour of Acanthaster planci versus Acanthaster cf. solaris. |
| title_full | Biogeographical variation in diurnal behaviour of Acanthaster planci versus Acanthaster cf. solaris. |
| title_fullStr | Biogeographical variation in diurnal behaviour of Acanthaster planci versus Acanthaster cf. solaris. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Biogeographical variation in diurnal behaviour of Acanthaster planci versus Acanthaster cf. solaris. |
| title_short | Biogeographical variation in diurnal behaviour of Acanthaster planci versus Acanthaster cf. solaris. |
| title_sort | biogeographical variation in diurnal behaviour of acanthaster planci versus acanthaster cf solaris |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228796 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT deborahburn biogeographicalvariationindiurnalbehaviourofacanthasterplanciversusacanthastercfsolaris AT samuelmatthews biogeographicalvariationindiurnalbehaviourofacanthasterplanciversusacanthastercfsolaris AT ciemonfcaballes biogeographicalvariationindiurnalbehaviourofacanthasterplanciversusacanthastercfsolaris AT josiefchandler biogeographicalvariationindiurnalbehaviourofacanthasterplanciversusacanthastercfsolaris AT morganspratchett biogeographicalvariationindiurnalbehaviourofacanthasterplanciversusacanthastercfsolaris |