Impact of Cleaning on Membrane Performance during Surface Water Treatment: A Hybrid Process with Biological Ion Exchange and Gravity-Driven Membranes

In this study, the hybrid biological ion exchange (BIEX) resin and gravity-driven membrane (GDM) process was employed for the treatment of coloured and turbid river water. The primary objective was to investigate the impact of both physical and chemical cleaning methods on ceramic and polymeric memb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yaser Rasouli, Benoit Barbeau, Raphaël Maltais-Tariant, Caroline Boudoux, Dominique Claveau-Mallet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Membranes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/14/2/33
_version_ 1797297569082114048
author Yaser Rasouli
Benoit Barbeau
Raphaël Maltais-Tariant
Caroline Boudoux
Dominique Claveau-Mallet
author_facet Yaser Rasouli
Benoit Barbeau
Raphaël Maltais-Tariant
Caroline Boudoux
Dominique Claveau-Mallet
author_sort Yaser Rasouli
collection DOAJ
description In this study, the hybrid biological ion exchange (BIEX) resin and gravity-driven membrane (GDM) process was employed for the treatment of coloured and turbid river water. The primary objective was to investigate the impact of both physical and chemical cleaning methods on ceramic and polymeric membranes in terms of their stabilised flux, flux recovery after physical/chemical cleaning, and permeate quality. To address these objectives, two types of MF and UF membranes were utilised (M1 = polymeric MF, M2 = polymeric UF, M3 = ceramic UF, and M4 = lab-made ceramic MF). Throughout the extended operation, the resin functioned initially in the primary ion exchange (IEX) region (NOM displacement with pre-charged chloride) and progressed to a secondary IEX stage (NOM displacement with bicarbonate and sulphate), while membrane flux remained stable. Subsequently, physical cleaning involved air/water backwash with two different flows and pressures, and chemical cleaning utilised NaOH at concentrations of 20 and 40 mM, as well as NaOCl at concentrations of 250 and 500 mg Cl<sub>2</sub>/L. These processes were carried out to assess flux recovery and identify fouling reversibility. The results indicate an endpoint of 1728 bed volumes (BVs) for the primary IEX region, while the secondary IEX continued up to 6528 BV. At the end of the operation, DOC and UVA<sub>254</sub> removal in the effluent of the BIEX columns were 68% and 81%, respectively, compared to influent water. This was followed by 30% and 57% DOC and UVA<sub>254</sub> removal using M4 (ceramic MF). The stabilised flux remained approximately 3.8–5.2 LMH both before and after the cleaning process, suggesting that membrane materials do not play a pivotal role. The mean stabilised flux of polymeric membranes increased after cleaning, whereas that of the ceramics decreased. Enhanced air–water backwash flow and pressure resulted in an increased removal of hydraulic reversible fouling, which was identified as the dominant fouling type. Ceramic membranes exhibited a higher removal of reversible hydraulic fouling than polymeric membranes. Chemical cleaning had a low impact on flux recovery; therefore, we recommend solely employing physical cleaning.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:22:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d79faa5b039c455b9fe0cd33884f6db9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0375
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:22:14Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Membranes
spelling doaj.art-d79faa5b039c455b9fe0cd33884f6db92024-02-23T15:26:53ZengMDPI AGMembranes2077-03752024-01-011423310.3390/membranes14020033Impact of Cleaning on Membrane Performance during Surface Water Treatment: A Hybrid Process with Biological Ion Exchange and Gravity-Driven MembranesYaser Rasouli0Benoit Barbeau1Raphaël Maltais-Tariant2Caroline Boudoux3Dominique Claveau-Mallet4Department of Civil, Geological & Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, CanadaDepartment of Civil, Geological & Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, CanadaDepartment of Engineering Physics, Polytechnique Montréal, 2900 Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, CanadaDepartment of Engineering Physics, Polytechnique Montréal, 2900 Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, CanadaDepartment of Civil, Geological & Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, CanadaIn this study, the hybrid biological ion exchange (BIEX) resin and gravity-driven membrane (GDM) process was employed for the treatment of coloured and turbid river water. The primary objective was to investigate the impact of both physical and chemical cleaning methods on ceramic and polymeric membranes in terms of their stabilised flux, flux recovery after physical/chemical cleaning, and permeate quality. To address these objectives, two types of MF and UF membranes were utilised (M1 = polymeric MF, M2 = polymeric UF, M3 = ceramic UF, and M4 = lab-made ceramic MF). Throughout the extended operation, the resin functioned initially in the primary ion exchange (IEX) region (NOM displacement with pre-charged chloride) and progressed to a secondary IEX stage (NOM displacement with bicarbonate and sulphate), while membrane flux remained stable. Subsequently, physical cleaning involved air/water backwash with two different flows and pressures, and chemical cleaning utilised NaOH at concentrations of 20 and 40 mM, as well as NaOCl at concentrations of 250 and 500 mg Cl<sub>2</sub>/L. These processes were carried out to assess flux recovery and identify fouling reversibility. The results indicate an endpoint of 1728 bed volumes (BVs) for the primary IEX region, while the secondary IEX continued up to 6528 BV. At the end of the operation, DOC and UVA<sub>254</sub> removal in the effluent of the BIEX columns were 68% and 81%, respectively, compared to influent water. This was followed by 30% and 57% DOC and UVA<sub>254</sub> removal using M4 (ceramic MF). The stabilised flux remained approximately 3.8–5.2 LMH both before and after the cleaning process, suggesting that membrane materials do not play a pivotal role. The mean stabilised flux of polymeric membranes increased after cleaning, whereas that of the ceramics decreased. Enhanced air–water backwash flow and pressure resulted in an increased removal of hydraulic reversible fouling, which was identified as the dominant fouling type. Ceramic membranes exhibited a higher removal of reversible hydraulic fouling than polymeric membranes. Chemical cleaning had a low impact on flux recovery; therefore, we recommend solely employing physical cleaning.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/14/2/33hydraulic reversible foulingflux recoverypermeate qualitymembrane cleaningpolymeric membranesceramic membranes
spellingShingle Yaser Rasouli
Benoit Barbeau
Raphaël Maltais-Tariant
Caroline Boudoux
Dominique Claveau-Mallet
Impact of Cleaning on Membrane Performance during Surface Water Treatment: A Hybrid Process with Biological Ion Exchange and Gravity-Driven Membranes
Membranes
hydraulic reversible fouling
flux recovery
permeate quality
membrane cleaning
polymeric membranes
ceramic membranes
title Impact of Cleaning on Membrane Performance during Surface Water Treatment: A Hybrid Process with Biological Ion Exchange and Gravity-Driven Membranes
title_full Impact of Cleaning on Membrane Performance during Surface Water Treatment: A Hybrid Process with Biological Ion Exchange and Gravity-Driven Membranes
title_fullStr Impact of Cleaning on Membrane Performance during Surface Water Treatment: A Hybrid Process with Biological Ion Exchange and Gravity-Driven Membranes
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Cleaning on Membrane Performance during Surface Water Treatment: A Hybrid Process with Biological Ion Exchange and Gravity-Driven Membranes
title_short Impact of Cleaning on Membrane Performance during Surface Water Treatment: A Hybrid Process with Biological Ion Exchange and Gravity-Driven Membranes
title_sort impact of cleaning on membrane performance during surface water treatment a hybrid process with biological ion exchange and gravity driven membranes
topic hydraulic reversible fouling
flux recovery
permeate quality
membrane cleaning
polymeric membranes
ceramic membranes
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/14/2/33
work_keys_str_mv AT yaserrasouli impactofcleaningonmembraneperformanceduringsurfacewatertreatmentahybridprocesswithbiologicalionexchangeandgravitydrivenmembranes
AT benoitbarbeau impactofcleaningonmembraneperformanceduringsurfacewatertreatmentahybridprocesswithbiologicalionexchangeandgravitydrivenmembranes
AT raphaelmaltaistariant impactofcleaningonmembraneperformanceduringsurfacewatertreatmentahybridprocesswithbiologicalionexchangeandgravitydrivenmembranes
AT carolineboudoux impactofcleaningonmembraneperformanceduringsurfacewatertreatmentahybridprocesswithbiologicalionexchangeandgravitydrivenmembranes
AT dominiqueclaveaumallet impactofcleaningonmembraneperformanceduringsurfacewatertreatmentahybridprocesswithbiologicalionexchangeandgravitydrivenmembranes